03-28-2012, 10:45 AM | #12 |
Registered Truck Offender
Join Date: May 2008
Location: hells training ground (aka Ariz)
Posts: 3,118
|
Re: stroke to rod ratio:
Theres a point where you have no choice tho. take a 4" stroke and stuff into a sbc package and you can't use a 5.7 rod. It just doesn't clear the counterweights. Well,,, I've seen guys chuck up a crank and turn the counterweights down to nothing and then add back bucketloads of mallory to get it in balance. But WHY??? Common sense says in a stroker application your stuck with the long rod,, ring pack be damn'd. Other than the piston stability at TDC the ring pack thing doesn't scare me a bit. With Childs Plasma Moly rings, a torque plate honed bore, setting ring gap for N/A I typically see a 1.5-2% leak on a fresh motor. after 2-3 seasons of hard abuse still above 4% so ring seal and oil control is not a issue with the proper oil rail support and ring and bore prep. We just get back to the issue of side loading the bore with a short rod,,,
__________________
Still playin with trucks, even at my age! When you're dead, it's only a problem for the people around you, because you don't know you're dead. .....It's kinda the same when your STUPID. I just did my taxes and reviewed my SS statement. Thanks to the current administration it looks like I will only have to work till noon on the day of my funeral. |
Bookmarks |
|
|