10-05-2007, 08:56 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: north carolina
Posts: 80
|
control arm angles?
o.k. I know that the lower control arms need to be level at ride height but what about the uppers? I dont have everything together yet but its looking like my uppers will be angled up a good bit. does this matter? do i need a certain distance between the upper and lower shafts? any help would be great.
|
10-05-2007, 09:06 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,684
|
Re: control arm angles?
i'm not sure about a required distance between the 2, but both of them do pivot so the distance would be however far apart they are when you get the spindle back on it.
__________________
1986 C10 SWB 6.0/6l90e Miami...Flee it like a native |
10-07-2007, 11:04 AM | #3 | |
just can't cover up my redneck
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
|
Re: control arm angles?
Quote:
|
|
10-07-2007, 11:51 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: north carolina
Posts: 80
|
Re: control arm angles?
the ride height is 4.5 in. yesterday i put them in place with the spindle and it doesnt look like too much angle to me but im not sure. i know at ride height my ball joint is about in the center of its movement. wouldnt this be about right?
|
10-08-2007, 08:27 PM | #5 |
It'd be alot cooler if you did
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Three Rivers, MI
Posts: 2,345
|
Re: control arm angles?
control arms should technically be parallel to the ground at ride height.;
|
10-08-2007, 09:14 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: north carolina
Posts: 80
|
Re: control arm angles?
should the upper and lower be level or can the lower be level and upper have some upward angle towards the spindle?
i dont want my tires to lean in at the top when im aired out can i avoid this with the ball joint placement or can it not be avoided? |
10-08-2007, 10:36 PM | #7 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Redway, Ca
Posts: 97
|
Re: control arm angles?
Quote:
Albie |
|
10-09-2007, 03:36 AM | #8 |
glamoros piece o' lowlife
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redford, MI
Posts: 1,164
|
Re: control arm angles?
control arms are different length, the uppers being shorter - when aired out the camber will increase towards inboard no matter what. When you set up suspension geometry you do it at the desired ride height, meaning yer cruise height - for instance my topless Lincoln is lowered in the front and jacked up in the rear, could have aired the rear out to level it a bit before getting it on the alignment rack but that ain't how I normally drive it, so I put it on as is. So yeah, figure out how high you want yer truck off the ground (both front and rear) and then take it for alignment like that.
__________________
The more I drink, the more I drink, the more I drink... diesel, reg cab, long bed, 4 across the rear, single stack, wooden stakes, and lotsa lights - the Hay Express |
10-09-2007, 11:32 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atascadero, CA
Posts: 1,152
|
Re: control arm angles?
I have a question. If having the control arms level at ride height what about when you install a drop spindel doesn't it alter the control arm from being level? I have always been told that you need to setup your suspension at ride height and your lower control arm should be level but never thought about why and what does it change if it isn't exactly level?
Josh
__________________
(Project truck) 1970 C10 under complete transformation My current build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=212871 Other project: C5 corvette swap into 70 c10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1#post2413517 On Hold |
10-09-2007, 11:53 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,684
|
Re: control arm angles?
the drop spindle "should" keep the same geometry as stock. If you look at a stock spindle and a drop spindle side by side, you will see where the "drop" comes into play.
As far as the arms being level, lowering springs will effect the arms being level. The springs don't compensate for the changed geometry between the upper and lowers. Hope this is not too confusing, wish I had some pics to explain a little better.
__________________
1986 C10 SWB 6.0/6l90e Miami...Flee it like a native |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|