Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-03-2009, 04:57 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: indian trail, nc
Posts: 192
|
Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
can someone tell me of a modern chassis that would pretty much be ready to roll under a 60-66 series shortbed? I've heard the mid to late 80's Blazers were a perfect fit but these are getting harder to find. Also, it may be blasphemy but has anyone ever fit a more fuel efficient Honda or Toyota engine and drive train in a mid 60's Chevy truck? maybe a better fit would be a modern four cylinder Chevy engine? I'm going for fuel efficiency here not horsepower! Anyone experienced in these matters?
|
03-03-2009, 05:04 PM | #2 |
TexasBowhunter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: alvin, texas
Posts: 450
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
Ive mated a 66 truck to a 77 Blazer chassis, but it werent easy.
Look in my sig. Rice burner in a 60-66? Prepare to be stoned!
__________________
Build in progress for son's first truck. Last edited by Joey~AP; 03-03-2009 at 05:09 PM. |
03-03-2009, 05:57 PM | #3 |
Airport Bum
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Propwash (16Xray) D/FW, Texas
Posts: 320
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
Maybe you need this.....
http://www.innovationretrokits.com/
__________________
1964 Chevrolet C-10 1941 Chevrolet coupe 1962 Thunderbird 1959 Edsel Villager 1963 Skylark |
03-03-2009, 05:58 PM | #4 | |
283 Drama Queen
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Surf City, CA
Posts: 2,435
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
Quote:
"Get your people back and heads down. This is gonna be a big one." (Apocalypse Now)
__________________
For about 12 years of my adult life I had a severe speech impediment. My ex-wife never let me get a word in edgewise. |
|
03-03-2009, 06:30 PM | #5 |
Resistance is Futile
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mesa,Arizona
Posts: 3,520
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
This isnt NASCAR......
__________________
64 CHEVY PICK-UP > http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...otrash+re-hash 64 CARRYALL >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1964+suburban 66 LB >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=427852 STRENGTH/DETERMINATION/MERCILESS/FOREVER .......posted via stationary device |
03-03-2009, 06:35 PM | #6 |
1962 C-10
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Las Vegas, New Mexico
Posts: 4,978
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
There's really not much difference between a 63-72 to chassis compared to what you call "modern". The biggest difference in the earlier years is brakes and power steering. You can easily adapt power disc brakes and power steering to the original chassis. Our truck have independent front coil spring suspension, which many newer ones still have, plus we have trailing arms and coils in the rear. Many people convert leaf spring suspensions to a trailing arm or a 3 or 4 link suspension. Our trucks already have a pretty dam good setup. If I were you, I'd convert your original chassis to power disc brakes/power steering...rather than doing a complete swap.
As for the Yamaguchi power plant...I'll have nothing to do with that! You got a lot of huevos asking about that over here...Don't you want your truck to have huevos too???
__________________
Joseph Chavez "See the USA in a Chevrolet!!" ......................_____ .........________//__{\_____ ,,,,,,,/__(O)___//___/__(O)_/ 1962 C10 Shortbed Fleetside 327/th350 GV overdrive 1974 C10 Longbed Fleetside 350/th350 "The Trash Truck" 1999 Chevy 2500 OBS, Longbed 5.7/4L80E 4x4 2015 GMC Sierra SLE 1500 4x4 |
03-03-2009, 07:02 PM | #7 |
283 Drama Queen
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Surf City, CA
Posts: 2,435
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
The point of these restorations - most of them anyway, isn’t fuel economy.
If I didn’t have the original 2-barrel carburator intake for my ‘283’ or it wasn’t in good shape - I’d have just gone with a small, modern four-barrel. Mine’s going to be a 25 mile per day (round trip) daily driver and at about 200 horsepower (at best) I didn’t want to go any more "pansy" than it is. Not saying a good 230 straight six with a 1-barrel isn’t as economical as you can get (because that’s what was in my C10 before it got ripped off), but honestly - pushing that kind of weight, the poor ol’ girl wasn’t exactly greased lightning coming off a green light at an intersection. Truth is - if I keep my foot out of it, the ‘283’ V-8 might get just about the same MPG as the ‘230’ Straight-6. We’ll see - once the new motor’s broken in. The main point in all of this is that an electric motor could probably be adapted to drive my truck, but personally - I like being an old school throw back. Well, that and my pick-up has the aerodynamics of a Kenmore. Mac.
__________________
For about 12 years of my adult life I had a severe speech impediment. My ex-wife never let me get a word in edgewise. |
03-03-2009, 07:10 PM | #8 |
1962 C-10
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Las Vegas, New Mexico
Posts: 4,978
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
Another powerplant to consider is a TBI 4.3 v6 or even a TBI 350. These will give a little better fuel economy and there still American...heck they're still CHEVY.
__________________
Joseph Chavez "See the USA in a Chevrolet!!" ......................_____ .........________//__{\_____ ,,,,,,,/__(O)___//___/__(O)_/ 1962 C10 Shortbed Fleetside 327/th350 GV overdrive 1974 C10 Longbed Fleetside 350/th350 "The Trash Truck" 1999 Chevy 2500 OBS, Longbed 5.7/4L80E 4x4 2015 GMC Sierra SLE 1500 4x4 |
03-03-2009, 07:47 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 13,821
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
sorry, couldn't help myself..................
__________________
CHEVY ONLY |
03-03-2009, 09:44 PM | #10 |
Hey Y'all!!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Minette, Alabama
Posts: 1,755
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
What you need to consider is these trucks need torque to get them moving.
In all actuality, a decent 350 can get better gas mileage than a smaller motor dependant on your setup. I once replaced a burnt up 305 with a stock 350 in an old Camaro that I had and picked up about 4 miles per gallon as a result.
__________________
Just hopin' I live long enough to finish something!!! |
03-03-2009, 10:02 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 148
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
smaller does not meen beter milage. I once had a 79 suburban with a 454 that got 14 mpg and couldnt sell it everyone wanted a 350 so I fanally swapped in a 350 and it got 12 mpg after that but 2 weeks later I sold it. You have to have enough motor to pull the weight and lack of aero. Just my 2 cents stick with a well tuned engine and add p/s and disc brakes if you want.
__________________
71 GMC Long Bed, 454,factory everything, lowered, and shaved. 64 GMC Short Bed (great grandfathers truck) 65 Chevy 1 ton Dually a/c p/s p/b v8 auto 89 Jeep Cherokee 3" lift 79 MG Midget (My 7 year old vehicle) 29 Ford Model A Rat Rod (in the works) 86 pontiac fiero 2.5 manual18 year olds) 87 pontiac fiero SE 2.8 auto (18 year olds) 90 Mitsubishi eclipes turbo AWD (18 year olds) 69 BMW 1600 (wifes toy) |
03-03-2009, 10:23 PM | #12 |
Registerd User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,118
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
A Honda or Toyota motor in our style of trucks = a flaming bag of crap on your door step.
|
03-04-2009, 01:52 AM | #13 |
60-66 Nut
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,252
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
Keep the original frame, swap in power discs, power steering, and add a modern GM power train such as a 5.3 with a 4L60E. This would be a nice to drive truck with classic styling and get decent mileage.....as good as you're going to get with a 2 ton brick.
Honda or Toyota engine.....
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE |
03-04-2009, 01:10 PM | #14 |
Its Deja Vu time again
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marysville, North of Seattle WA
Posts: 815
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
I know its off topic a bit, but Just like My Jeep TJ. It has a 4.0, but the popular swap is the modern Hemi which gives it tons of extra power, but oddly enough the motor weighs aboug the same or just a hair lighter. The motor barely has to work to move the body and gives you "tons" of power and great gas milage. Sounds like a beast too. To bad I can't afford it, but anyways.
I have a Factory 66 car motor in my 65, but I also have a 89 Rebuilt 350 sitting on a stand that I havent decided if I'm going to commit to as of yet. I'd almost bet the 350 weighs pretty close to the 250 with all the added benifits of the extra two cylinders. Give it a good tune up and required top end and you'd have a decent motor. With these trucks just like other hobbies vehicles its not about the gas milage anymore. Realiability, power and well good looks is what I think of half the time. Of course they might not all fall into the same package all the time, but sometimes you have to pick one of the three and tweak until you do. Last edited by kizer; 03-04-2009 at 01:14 PM. |
03-04-2009, 01:48 PM | #15 | |
283 Drama Queen
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Surf City, CA
Posts: 2,435
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
Quote:
Also - in these economic times, it's nice to know that you can open the hood and be able to work on (or screw up - in my case) your own stuff, versus the case of a new Caddy, where you open the hood to view a 6-foot wide plastic cover contraption. At least if I mess my stuff up I can always get you guys (and the NAPA store) to help me get it running again - as long as I go to Wal-Mart and get those darn pics. Mac.
__________________
For about 12 years of my adult life I had a severe speech impediment. My ex-wife never let me get a word in edgewise. |
|
03-04-2009, 05:23 PM | #16 |
Its Deja Vu time again
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marysville, North of Seattle WA
Posts: 815
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
Ah come on man. Don't be a hater.
I don't even know what I'm looking at either. Even better http://z.about.com/d/cars/1/0/J/9/1/ag_08sts_engine.jpg Last edited by kizer; 03-04-2009 at 05:25 PM. |
03-04-2009, 05:30 PM | #17 |
283 Drama Queen
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Surf City, CA
Posts: 2,435
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
__________________
For about 12 years of my adult life I had a severe speech impediment. My ex-wife never let me get a word in edgewise. |
03-04-2009, 07:42 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seattle Washington
Posts: 22
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
I didn't see if you were attempting to go with a 4-wheel drive frame for the conversion you have in mind. I think the easy solution for a 2-wheel drive is to just swap out the front end with a 77-80 2-wheel dr. 1/2 ton and use the later rearend also. If your looking for 4-wheel, the Blazer swap would be the way to go.
Last edited by 63Belair; 03-04-2009 at 07:46 PM. |
03-04-2009, 10:19 PM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: indian trail, nc
Posts: 192
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
Wow!...seems I touched a nerve! OK so the chasis swap is a pipe dream...I don't have the bucks to do it anyway. It's pretty solid as is. Don't go gettin' all riled up you asphalt chewin' horsepower junkies because I love the look of my straight six all decked out in Chevy Orange like it is. There just has to be a way of getting 24-30 mpg. out of her. I'm not planning to install power steering but I did buy a power brake booster and a dual master cylinder. Install set for this month. I am however keeping the drum/drum set up. They too will soon be painted Chevy Orange. I bought a beautiful set of five lug Corvette Rally rims w/ raised white letter BF Goodrich T/A's. If that ain't All-American red neck for you, I don't know what is! Pix will be posted next week.
|
03-04-2009, 10:29 PM | #20 | ||||
Hollister, CA.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hollister, Ca.
Posts: 6,150
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Seriously......as mentioned, you can make it more economical...just keep it GM !!
__________________
John What the Heck is that ?? CURRENT BUILDS: 62 BurbMaster Other Builds: My '63 C-10,LWB,CC,BBW '06 HD StrAight Axle Swap Father/Son '67 C-20, LQ9,4L80,Bagged,8-Lugger !!Good Friend Richard's Build AMERICAN CUSTOMS & CLASSICS (831) 630-1965 www.ACCHOLLISTER.com ACC on FACEBOOK "Rest in Peace, Mom & Dad ... I will see you again someday!" |
||||
03-04-2009, 10:51 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 873
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
Hey aboz,
I drive back and forth to work with a 6.2 litre 435 horse LS3 chevy motor and the average mpg today was 23.6. I am putting a 6 litre in my truck and expect to get over 20+ mpg. So you need to do three things. 1. Get a modern chevy LS motor, as someone mentioned 5.3L or bigger the better. They can be had cheaply, there are so many of them. 2. You have to slow the motor down. That requires an over-drive transmission like a T56 manual. You need the engine to run about 1300 rpm in high gear at 70 mph. (Our stock truck gearing is not suited to today's highway driving). With the high torque you can put put around in high gear at 45 mph. 3. Keep your foot out of it. (Actually I put my foot in it once per day, minimal hit on mileage) Good luck with your truck! TR
__________________
1965 C10 SWB Fleet Two owner LS2 Swap Thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=413880 |
03-05-2009, 12:56 AM | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,510
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
|
03-05-2009, 05:52 AM | #23 | |
"Where were you in '62?"
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cleveland County, North Cackalacky
Posts: 5,013
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
Quote:
You got to be broke in. Sounds like you just want a cruiser. What's your trannie hooked on that inline 6? Maybe you need a Powerglide Trans!
__________________
PROJECT: "FULL METAL YELLOW JACKET" 1962 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed Nostalgia Pro/Street Pickup Truck PROJECT: "FULL METAL YELLOW JACKET Build Thread What Are You Workin' On? - 1Bad62ChevyPickup PROJECT: "TYRANNORAMBLER REX" 1969 AMC Rambler American Nostalgia Pro/Street Youtube Channel: Father Son Projects Youtube Channel: 2TIMOTHY2FITHTEEN "North and South Carolina Folks Click Here!" (((( ~ I have Parts For Sale & Miscellaneous Stuff ~ )))) "Well being as there's no other place around the place, I reckon this must be the place, I reckon...Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk" -Curly Howard Ph.D. Last edited by 1Bad62Pro/Street; 03-05-2009 at 06:26 AM. |
|
03-05-2009, 11:35 PM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,510
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
why a powerglide?
A 700r4 or a T5 or any other OD tranny would be the ticket for him. |
03-06-2009, 02:03 AM | #25 | |
60-66 Nut
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,252
|
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed
Quote:
X2.....an OD trans and maybe a little bump up in the rear gear should help the mpg's. Also you might look at upgrading the ignition system to a HEI. that alone should get you 1+ mpg....I have experienced that on a small block.
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|