![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alden NY
Posts: 2,705
|
Power Steering Rag Joint part number
Just as an FYI- I am doing a PS conversion on my 70 burb. I needed the correct rag joint and couldn't find the answer in past posts although there was a post that indicated that Advance Auto Parts had two listed. The correct part number for the PS box is 200 ( yes, just 200). I was able to get one locally ($32.99) instead of having to order one, wait for it to arrive, and hope it was correct. NAPA and Autozone don't list any for my 70.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: NC
Posts: 987
|
Re: Power Steering Rag Joint part number
I believe the correct part number for power steering is 201. Here is a link that might help.
Edit...the link might help. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=365261 Last edited by Alex Hayley; 11-16-2009 at 09:03 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pleak, Texas
Posts: 420
|
Re: Power Steering Rag Joint part number
Just use one from a 68-79 chevy truck. They're all the same. In 1980, the box went to metric, but I'm not 100% sure if the rag joint changed as well.
__________________
-1967 Chevrolet Fleetside LWB- 350 V8 w/thumpr cam, NV3500, 3.08 gears, A/C, PS ![]() -1983 Chevy Silverado C1500- 383 stroker, TH400 -1989 Chevy Silverado K1500 SWB- 5.3L swap, 700R4, 3.42 gears -And a '66 Ford Mustang- 200 I6, C4 trans, rust bucket "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." -FDR (and maybe rust too) ![]() You've gotta be able to stop and steer before you can go fast! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alden NY
Posts: 2,705
|
Re: Power Steering Rag Joint part number
Alex,
The 200 coupler fit the PS box correctly. I took the box with me to Advance today to test fit it and it's on the box now. That was one of the links I looked at and it was never clear whether the 200 or 201 was correct on that thread. That's why I posted the info. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|