02-10-2010, 12:41 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Whitemud Alberta
Posts: 328
|
348/409
Anybody put a w-head in a 64-66 pickup?. I'm wondering if it will fit without modifying the firewall. It LOOKS like the engine might be too wide for the valve covers to clear. Thoughts?
|
02-10-2010, 01:05 PM | #2 |
Airport Bum
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Propwash (16Xray) D/FW, Texas
Posts: 320
|
Re: 348/409
No, but i'd give my wisdom teeth for a 340 horse 409 with a 348 tripower in my '64.
maybe one day. I'd sure like to see pics if someone has done it.
__________________
1964 Chevrolet C-10 1941 Chevrolet coupe 1962 Thunderbird 1959 Edsel Villager 1963 Skylark |
02-10-2010, 01:36 PM | #3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sidney,b.c.
Posts: 4,425
|
Re: 348/409
Quote:
ron Last edited by padresag; 02-10-2010 at 01:37 PM. |
|
02-10-2010, 03:02 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Whitemud Alberta
Posts: 328
|
Re: 348/409
That's a good point. However, i think the cabs on the bigger trucks are mounted higher off the frame which would put the valve covers down where the tunnel is wider but I'm not certain. How about a big block with tall valve covers??? if that fits, the W-head big block should.......I think.
|
02-10-2010, 03:33 PM | #5 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Plumas Lake, Ca.
Posts: 1,009
|
Re: 348/409
I was wondering the same thing last night as I have a complete & fresh '64 409 in my garage.
|
02-10-2010, 07:18 PM | #6 | |
Resistance is Futile
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mesa,Arizona
Posts: 3,520
|
Re: 348/409
Quote:
__________________
64 CHEVY PICK-UP > http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...otrash+re-hash 64 CARRYALL >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1964+suburban 66 LB >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=427852 STRENGTH/DETERMINATION/MERCILESS/FOREVER .......posted via stationary device |
|
02-10-2010, 08:00 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sidney,b.c.
Posts: 4,425
|
Re: 348/409
66 models used the 366 eng which is a BB. Looking at a pic of a floor on a lager model the floois pretty well devoid of a hump, which goes with the raised body mounts, stating that the body is raised. we will just have to wait a see what someone will say upon actually seeing a visual of a c33-50 cab.
but loooking at the raised mounts, they may be good for someone who is giong to do a boyy lift or adapting to a later frame ron |
02-10-2010, 10:48 PM | #8 |
1961 crewcab
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: missoula, mt
Posts: 6,164
|
Re: 348/409
these are the only shots I have. 65 c80:
__________________
60 build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=280904 61 crew build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=646830 63 build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=336537 64 'burb build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=448681 65 'burb build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=590715 65 build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=281955 |
02-10-2010, 11:19 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora, CA
Posts: 6,344
|
Re: 348/409
My Dad put a 348 in his '59 so I don't see why you couldn't make one fit in a 64-66.
|
02-11-2010, 12:52 AM | #10 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 3,906
|
Re: 348/409
Quote:
The light-duty, series 10, 20 & 30 cabs are all the same. The medium-duty, series 40 & 50 and the heavy-duty, series 60 & 80 have the virtually flat tranny cover. |
|
02-11-2010, 02:14 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Whitemud Alberta
Posts: 328
|
Re: 348/409
I did some measuring today and it looks unlikely that a W-head will fit without firewall mods. The height of the valve covers from the motor mount is the same on the W as the SBC but the W is 4 inches wider at the outside top corner of the valve covers than a SBC. At present there is about 1 inch clearance from the valve cover to the firewall tunnel so, it appears that the fire wall will have to be pushed out >1 inch on each side. Not a major, just means that I will not be doing the swap until next winter. Just as well, I have other things to do anyway. When the time come I will post what was involved (if anything) so anyone else considering such a swap will have a bit of a guide.
Last edited by Northern lights; 02-11-2010 at 02:16 PM. |
02-11-2010, 06:10 PM | #12 |
1961 crewcab
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: missoula, mt
Posts: 6,164
|
Re: 348/409
some day i would like a w moter in my 65...
__________________
60 build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=280904 61 crew build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=646830 63 build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=336537 64 'burb build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=448681 65 'burb build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=590715 65 build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=281955 |
02-11-2010, 07:01 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: mount angel, oregon
Posts: 42
|
Re: 348/409
I have a 409 that I am eventually going to put into my 63 suburban. Right now I am rebuilding the front end. When I get the motor mounts in I will set the 409 in and let you know what the clearance looks like.
|
02-13-2010, 02:29 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Whitemud Alberta
Posts: 328
|
Re: 348/409
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|