Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-15-2011, 12:40 PM | #1 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: indisclosed
Posts: 1,515
|
"Short" deck vs. standard deck vs. ?
So what's the deal with "short deck" as opposed to standard deck (9.025"?).
---why? ---advantages/disadvantages etc.? |
05-16-2011, 03:28 PM | #2 |
On a budget like Fred Sanford
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 2,031
|
Re: "Short" deck vs. standard deck vs. ?
Short deck = standard deck. There's only standard deck & tall deck as far as I'm aware.
__________________
'85 Silverado swb: 383 stroker, 10.5:1, vortec heads, 232/238 roller cam, RPM air gap, performer 750 carb, stainless longtubes, 3" duals/super 44's, T56/4.11 383ci build / exterior refresh thread '98 Camaro z28: 370ci twin turbo 370ci build '01 Tahoe LT 4x4: 5.3, longtubes/ory, magnaflow duals, custom tune....wife's DD Last edited by swb85; 05-16-2011 at 03:30 PM. |
05-17-2011, 08:45 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wataga,IL
Posts: 666
|
Re: "Short" deck vs. standard deck vs. ?
you can make a 434ci small block out of a standard 400 block
now, if you have a 9.3 or even 9.5 block you can get over 500ci there are 3 or maybe even 4 different deck height of bbc's. all have their size limits as well. some people like using them taller blocks even on smaller cube engines to run a longer rod as well. |
05-17-2011, 01:35 PM | #4 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: indisclosed
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: "Short" deck vs. standard deck vs. ?
Thanks. i will have plethora of follow up questions concering this.
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|