Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-03-2012, 12:05 AM | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: houston,texas
Posts: 58
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
If you can swing the initail cost of the 5.3 or 6.0 (gas no diesel) then go for it. Mileage would consideralbly pick up and so will the power. Several people with ls setups in our trucks getting 23-25mpg with little effort. and if you ever decide to step it up the aftermarket is great.
|
01-03-2012, 12:24 AM | #27 | |
"Oh well, it's a driver."
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,467
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
^ I think that's the biggest strike against the LT motors (LT1/LT4): They didn't make them for long, and hardly anybody is transplanting them anymore, meaning it's gonna get tougher in the future to find aftermarket support for them.
LS swaps are great. But you have to have a whole lot of cash up front, or a great shop to work out of and tons of time and fab skills. I DD my truck, and I'm wanting to go to Vortec heads and modify my factory TBI. (The GMPP intake really is pricey; I'd probably do a carb intake with an TB adapter.) A little cam, headers, tune, more fuel and better ignition should make a nice everyday cruiser. Would the mileage savings make a 5.3 swap worth the extra money? Probably, but I don't have the money on the front end, so it doesn't matter
__________________
- JB - '93 C1500 SHORT/FLEET SILVERADO, 350/4L60E Quote:
|
|
01-03-2012, 01:18 AM | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 5,811
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
If you have a pull a part close to you go looking for a engine.I love pull a parts prices any v8 is like 160 bucks.
|
01-03-2012, 08:14 AM | #29 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,047
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Quote:
They get around 10% - 15% better fuel economy than a conventional small block. They're great engines and all, but they're not magic. They just do a better job of getting fuel and air into the engine than the older stuff. |
|
01-03-2012, 07:03 PM | #30 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Quote:
Unfortunately I don't have the patience to work through issues like that, I prefer the bolt in aspect even if it is a little pricier. Quote:
For my '87 crew (TBI) the engine is very tired (166k); it shows about 40psi at start up, but is around 0 after I get it warmed up. I am sure the gauge is off or it would be making some serious noise, but it smokes on start up (blue) and I think I can see blue smoke when I get on it. The 3.73's with a T400 and 275/60-15's aren't helping either when I insist on going 70mph on the freeway. I have a low mile 350 in my garage and I had planned on putting that engine in my '87 with a EGR Edelbrock Performer manifold with a TBI adapter. If the Vortec heads are that much better it might be worth the work you described above? Quote:
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg) 2000 Tahoe Limited 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now 1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd 1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold) |
|||
01-03-2012, 10:08 PM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: houston,texas
Posts: 58
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Well i cant tell you about your oil problem but ive seen it done on a tbi truck with a performer for vortec heads. It worked and made decent power. They used the used a spacer. No need for the gmpp
Also therebare ls setups that do get 23+mpg. They generally are not lifted but they do exist. My truck weighs 3990 with the sbc iron heads and iron intake. The ls is a hare lighter with the plastic intake and aluminum heads. I expect at least 20mpg Posted via Mobile Device |
01-03-2012, 10:19 PM | #32 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: houston,texas
Posts: 58
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Kevinr1970 how much does your 06 weigh
Posted via Mobile Device |
01-03-2012, 10:37 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 6,370
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
My 85 5.3L 3/4 ton Suburban gets 17-19MPG, My 04 5.3L 1/2 ton Crew gets 13-17MPG. The Suburban has a tune & will out-run my Crew & gets better mileage....Same Engine/Trans/Gears & similar weight & tire height, The tune makes alot of difference.
I have got mid twenties out of a 00 Pontiac Trans Am LS1/M6 stock with a good tune. I highly doubt you can get that with square body brick. |
01-03-2012, 11:17 PM | #34 | |
"Oh well, it's a driver."
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,467
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
kevinr, I may be wrong, but that's the impression I've gotten from following LS builds on here. You can probably get by without any fabrication, but I'm betting if you have some skills you'd be able to save some cash.
And from everything I've ever heard, the Vortecs are light years ahead of the factory TBI heads, which flow pretty badly.
__________________
- JB - '93 C1500 SHORT/FLEET SILVERADO, 350/4L60E Quote:
|
|
01-03-2012, 11:59 PM | #35 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Tx
Posts: 62
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Quote:
|
|
01-04-2012, 01:18 PM | #36 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 321
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Dont do what I did (TPI 350) I dropped a ton of money and time to get the power out of it and in the long run it would of cost less to do a 5.3 swap and have more power for less money my engine stock had 210hp(TPI 350) when I was done it made 300hp @ the wheels the 5.3's start around 300hp+ (flywheel) but with tuning and simple bolt on's you can get an easy 60 to 70hp more
I didnt cheap out on my engine stealth ram injection, forged internals, splayed caps, aluminum heads & Etc. $10k invested and just redone it for more power another $3k way deep in it! a 5.3 with the same HP would of cost about 1/2 as much! when I was shopping for an engine 4 years ago the 5.3 aftermarket was just taking off and every thing was very hi cost now its cheaper to do and with the conversion kits made easy not to mention how many 5.3's you see out there with over 150k miles on them getting 15mpg+ but the down fall is all the electronics the air intake tube on my 07 suburban fell off and true a engine code and the truck was not shifting right lol |
01-04-2012, 02:55 PM | #37 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Quote:
Quote:
It was a "work truck" but was a custom order with a v8, PW/PL, upgrade seat, upgrade stereo, tinited glass, rear window slider, locker, 3.23's, etc; when it was delivered the guy came to pick it up and left with a crewcab instead so the were looking to unload this one. I should mention that I lowered this truck 2"/4" but I don't think that should have changed the mpg drasticly?
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg) 2000 Tahoe Limited 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now 1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd 1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold) |
||
01-04-2012, 03:03 PM | #38 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Quote:
I ran pump regular gas on it with no problems Quote:
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg) 2000 Tahoe Limited 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now 1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd 1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold) |
||
01-04-2012, 07:17 PM | #39 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Kennewick WA.
Posts: 1,437
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
I just ran across an add here in richland on CL. Can't post link from phone though. The add reads;
"6.0L LQ4 OUT OF 2500 TRUCK. HAS 60K MI. 509-539-2973 /WARRANTY." May be worth a phone call, and with the hanford layoffs hurting the economy he may not be all that firm on the price. The add is a couple pages back under parts KPR Craigslist and has pics. Posted via Mobile Device Last edited by meter swinger; 01-04-2012 at 07:21 PM. Reason: + |
01-05-2012, 11:33 AM | #40 |
1965 Chevy C10, 2005 4.8L/4l60
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 8,546
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
You can usually get a 4.8/5.3 with everything ( harness,PCM and accessories) for under $1K here, with a trans ( 4l60e) for around $1500.00. That would be under 100K miles. Now I think you can do the swap for probably under $3K pretty easily ( 1500 motor\trans, 500 Fuel pump/pre-filter and misc, 500 harness rework and PCM flash, more misc $500.)
You will get better fuel mileage, depending on your foot, tune and cam you put on it, you will also get better starting and reliability. the LS motors will easily run 300K miles if you take care of them, my BIL had a 5.3 with 400K on it when he traded it. Good luck with whatever option you decide is best for you!
__________________
Clyde65 Rebuild of Clyde http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post8338184 69 Aristocrat Lo Liner build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post7561684 support our troops! |
01-05-2012, 06:58 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
I am going to put my foot into it no matter what, so I should still get better mileage, right...
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg) 2000 Tahoe Limited 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now 1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd 1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold) |
01-05-2012, 07:05 PM | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Quote:
http://kpr.craigslist.org/pts/2738448373.html $1800 for just the engine and it looks like just a long block? I am interested in a engine tranny combo, thanks though!
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg) 2000 Tahoe Limited 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now 1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd 1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold) |
|
01-08-2012, 03:58 PM | #43 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Quote:
|
|
01-08-2012, 04:07 PM | #44 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: freeburg, illinois
Posts: 885
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
I would stay away from the later model motors which i think is o6 or 07 just because I'm not interested in dealing with vvt/afm which can be a hassle but also can be removed as for the price of 1800$ for a long block you can buy a full 6.0 wired, accessories all for that with good miles
As for head flow I'm pretty sure stock tbi heads don't flow very well especially compared to 6.0 heads
__________________
1987 Chevy V30 - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=573854 1988 IROC-Z Camaro - 305/T5 T-Top 1989 GMC V35 - Marbolo Express http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=596850 1991 V2500 Suburban Silverado - Sold 1991 V2500 Suburban Scottsdale - Big Nasty http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=497423 2001 Ram 3500 5.9 H.O NV56 EC DRW - Sold 2003 1500 Silverado 2004 Ram 3500 5.9 H.O NV56 CC DRW - Sold 2005 Silverado 2500HD 6.6/ZF6 CC LWB |
01-09-2012, 01:24 PM | #45 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 321
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
it might be better to buy a wrecked car/truck for cheap money (if you can) that way you can take all the parts you need to do the swap then scrap or part out the rest, cousin of mine just bought totaled 03 truck for $1200 with a good engine and trans with only 65k
|
01-09-2012, 06:14 PM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
I may have just changed directions... again...
I was browsing around the KPR CL and saw a Suburban for sale that said it had a low mile 350hp 5.7 with vortec heads. I sent a message asking if it was the GMPP 350HO and the turns out the guy selling it is my uncle! After talking to him (he had no idea I was a truck guy?), he doesn't know much about the engine, only that it was a "turn-key" crate engine that he bought about 10 or so years ago from a Chevy dealer in Hermiston, OR, that at the time was supposed to be the biggest crate engine retailer in the country. He said he is pretty sure it is not the 350HO and that it is not a roller cam, but that is about all he really knows. He did say it had worlds more power than the 350 it replaced. I am going to look at it next weekend, and probably drive it home; he said the only reason he is selling it is that it only gets driven a few weekends a year camping/hunting and that after telling him what my plans were he would adjust his asking price to the "family" discount So maybe EFI is a little further down the line for now...
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg) 2000 Tahoe Limited 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now 1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd 1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold) |
01-09-2012, 06:22 PM | #47 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Tx
Posts: 62
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
i wouldnt suggest using the vortecs spider fuel injection system, its horrible. you can easily graft a TBI system from another 350 on top for cheap and have a good running fuel injected engine. youd just need a vortec carbed intake (i prefer the rpm air gap from edelbrock) and mount a tb adapter on that, and the tb on top. pump up the fuel pressure a little to handle the extra power the engine sounds like it has, and youll be good to go.
|
01-09-2012, 06:22 PM | #48 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 321
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Quote:
thats some thing you need to ask yourself only you can answer that lol |
|
01-09-2012, 06:40 PM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Also, an Edelbrock Performer TBI manifold popped up on CL this weekend so I picked it up. Even if I don't end up using it I should be able to get my money back out of it.
So, here is my new thought for my crewcab; my rebuilt engine with "RV" cam, have my TBI heads rebuilt, or just buy rebuilt ones and this new TBI manifold. Is my non-TBI 350 long block (it was in an '84 K5 and I was told it was the original engine that was rebuilt) and a rebuilt set of TBI heads compatible? Since I do not have any specs on the cam, should I replace the cam at this time so we know what we are working with when having the ECU(?) reprogrammed? Maybe just sell the engine in the garage and have the TBI engine in the truck now rebuilt??? My head spins a little when trying to figure out which direction I need to go...
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg) 2000 Tahoe Limited 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now 1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd 1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold) |
01-09-2012, 07:01 PM | #50 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 321
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Quote:
I still think 5.3 is your best bet your starting with 100hp more then your currant engine I know around here theres always seems to be a 5.3 with the belt drive system for under $1000 and others with every thing even a ECU for $2000 to $2500 and it blows me away since I have to much tied up in my 383 stroker |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|