10-24-2012, 12:58 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 92
|
Should I go to 4:10s?
Currently running 4:56 with granny low transmission, 283 with quadrajet. Would going to 4:10 make much difference in mpgs?
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Grandpa's 1965 Chevrolet C20 in the family since new |
10-24-2012, 01:15 AM | #2 |
60-66 Nut
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,252
|
Re: Should I go to 4:10s?
Probably not much of a difference in mpg. I am guessing your rpm's will drop 3-400 rpms @60 mph.
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE |
10-24-2012, 01:58 AM | #3 |
Senior Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 8,356
|
Re: Should I go to 4:10s?
The only improvement I can see is possibly raising your top speed from 45-50 mph to 55-60 mph, depending on rear tire diameter.
__________________
My Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444502 |
10-24-2012, 09:06 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 92
|
Re: Should I go to 4:10s?
Well I'm running 16.5 rims all the way around which made a difference over the 15's and top speed is around 70. I would like to bring the rpms down. I've found someone with the 4:10 3rd member, is that hard to change out?
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Grandpa's 1965 Chevrolet C20 in the family since new |
10-24-2012, 09:12 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,925
|
Re: Should I go to 4:10s?
go to 3:73's a set of gears is not that hard to find......Kieth
|
10-24-2012, 09:57 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 92
|
Re: Should I go to 4:10s?
I would love to go 3:73 but I'd have to change out the whole axle and since I have coil spring suspension, finding 3:73 eaton axles seems to be pretty tough.
__________________
Grandpa's 1965 Chevrolet C20 in the family since new |
10-24-2012, 11:22 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Galt, Calif
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: Should I go to 4:10s?
Just keep watching CL they pop up pretty often, too bad your not in calif, there are three on there now...all those guys are looking for 3.42 and 3.08, maybe consider buying a gear set and install...
__________________
`64 C10 vortec 350/350/373 posi `69 RS/SS 350/350/308 `37 Ford 406/350/324 traclock `68 Dart 370/904/323 suregrip |
10-25-2012, 12:04 AM | #8 | |
60-66 Nut
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,252
|
Re: Should I go to 4:10s?
I myself have never seen a 3.73 geared 3rd member for a Eaton HO52/72. The tallest I have seen are the 4.10's
Quote:
To change the 3rd member, you will need to remove the bolts holding the axles in, and then slide the axles out. I would remove the rear cover, to let most of the oil out. Then you can remove and replace the 3rd member.
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE |
|
10-25-2012, 01:00 AM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: southeasternfoothillsofusa
Posts: 1,557
|
Re: Should I go to 4:10s?
Quote:
Cheapest, quickest, & easiest thing to do to drop rpm's would be to run taller tires. Figure it using ratio-and-proportion like above & it'll get you close to what you want. Should you desire to change tranny to automatic, w/overdrive, a 700R4 will make it cruise in od where the engine feels that the rear end is now: 4.56 X .70(% gear reduction from overdrive) = 3.19:1. And would give one heckuva 1st-gear launch off the line! Would that be the best of both worlds? This changes rpm's at given speed by 30%; increases top speed by 30%; raises mpg by 30%--and if all this theory is correct, it would be great! Nonetheless, the rpm-drop should be as calculated, where mpg & top speed may be overrated. |
|
10-25-2012, 09:11 AM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 92
|
Re: Should I go to 4:10s?
Thanks so much for all the information, it really helps. Maybe a 10% gain isnt worth the trouble, I don't know really. Since this truck is all original I've tried to keep almost everything that way but an automatic would be nice. If there was a way to do it without majorly changing appearance or to make it look stock, I'd certainly consider it. I guess my theory with the 4:10 is then I wouldn't have to change much, although the guy also has a 3:30 complete axle too for sale.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Grandpa's 1965 Chevrolet C20 in the family since new |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|