The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-12-2013, 07:32 PM   #1
mrhino
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,223
20 mpg or not?

Within the week or so, the wife & I will be starting the engine build for the crew cab project we have going on. Over the weekend, It brought up a interesting debate with a few buddies that I trust and respect for their engine performance knowledge. My Goal with this engine is to get 20 MPG. A couple said it could be done and a couple said it wouldn't happen. Everyone made their points and theories. The debate and conversation was educational and interesting so I thought Id ask it here and see what some of the thoughts are.

The truck is a 88 1 ton crew.
4:11 rear
305/70/16 tires
700r4 trans

the engine will be a .30 over 5.7
58cc 187 swirl port heads with a mild port job.
20cc dished pistons
vortec Roller Cam 191º/196º 0.414"/.428" lift on a 111º LSA.
1 5/8 headers

so do you think it will get 20 MPG?

Last edited by mrhino; 03-12-2013 at 08:31 PM.
mrhino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 07:36 PM   #2
thotfulspot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 198
Re: 20 mpg or not?

Since our vehicles have the aerodynamics of a brick I would be surprised if 20 mpg is possible unless coasting downhills.
Posted via Mobile Device
thotfulspot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 07:44 PM   #3
Keith Seymore
Registered User
 
Keith Seymore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,226
Re: 20 mpg or not?

I suspect no.

I can get 20-22 ish with my truck, which is a 1/2 ton shortbox with a 4.3, 3.73 gears and overdrive.

You've got your work cut out for you, especially with those 4.11 gears.

K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly
1979-1986
GM Full Size Truck Engineering
1986 - 2019
Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/
Keith Seymore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 07:56 PM   #4
GM-power
Registered User
 
GM-power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 770
Re: 20 mpg or not?

I highly doubt it. Its hard enough to get that with a sbc in a half ton.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
1979 Sierra Classic Heavy-half
1996 Silverado x-cab "the daily"
GM-power is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 07:56 PM   #5
57rookie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 153
Re: 20 mpg or not?

I work for the worlds largest heavy truck manufacture and we own our own engine company as well. My experience tells me with the current rear axle ratio, the rolling mass of the one ton, and the engine displacement with the specs you listed that 20mpg on a true highway only average is not realistic.
I would suspect if you watch your speed (60mph max) you might achieve a true highway only average of 17 - 18 mpg.
57rookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 07:58 PM   #6
Restrorob
The One And Only !!!
 
Restrorob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hole in the woods Florida
Posts: 4,567
Re: 20 mpg or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Seymore View Post
I suspect no.

My 6 cyl 2x Jeep doesn't even do that.....
__________________
93 Jeep XJ
88 Buick La Sabra
Toys;
88 TA-GTA in the works....
97 GMC Ext. Cab
502 Crate 5 Spd......Sucks Gas But Haulz Azz !


The primary function of an Engineer is to make it difficult for the Fabricator and impossible for the Mechanic.


"Why go out preserved when you can go out beat up, worn out, sliding in sideways screaming, Holy Sh!t What A Ride" !!!
Restrorob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 08:13 PM   #7
bohmankid
Registered User
 
bohmankid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 520
Re: 20 mpg or not?

If you can get that beast to get 20 mpg, you should be an award winning engineer.
The weight, aerodynamics, size of the motor, tires, and wheel base all say no.
bohmankid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 08:15 PM   #8
jitteryguy
GoatLube Experss
 
jitteryguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: clarksville, Tn.
Posts: 1,337
Re: 20 mpg or not?

Certainly will have to change the gear ratio, the 700R4 will help with a lower ratio perhaps evan lower than 3.73. I'll be curious to see what you do get.
__________________
Goat Lube Express, locations in Qalat,Afghanistan & Clarksville, Tn.
'87 R30 dually 454/TH400
'85 1/2 ton CCSB
'92 S10 350/350
'84 MonteCarlo 383/PG/9"ford
'78 Malibu wagon 350/350
'78 Cutlass (project family car)
'96 S10 Jimmy (Moma's)

Last edited by jitteryguy; 03-12-2013 at 08:16 PM. Reason: spell'n
jitteryguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 08:30 PM   #9
mrhino
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,223
Re: 20 mpg or not?

I always new it would be a tall order. we all need goals right? I Figured I would be at about 1900 rpm at 65 mph
mrhino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 09:03 PM   #10
ivorton74
Registered User
 
ivorton74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 916
Re: 20 mpg or not?

pretty ambitious but like the others here I don't think u would achieve that. you would be better off swapping a 4.8 or 5.3 LS motor. you'll probably get 18mpg + with the LS motor...or switch to diesel.
ivorton74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 09:10 PM   #11
king-918
Registered User
 
king-918's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Oklahoma City Oklahoma
Posts: 1,056
Re: 20 mpg or not?

you're thinking about it all wrong, rid yourself of the old technology. time to find a hybrid Tahoe and get a Harvard grad
__________________
<----Christopher

Oh yeah I'm really a Toyota guy, but had some stuff sitting around.



Oklahoma
king-918 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 09:20 PM   #12
KQQL IT
At the body shop.
 
KQQL IT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Land of fruits and nuts.
Posts: 5,257
Re: 20 mpg or not?

6bt will do 20+
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
" That didnt make it any newer "
" Dont antique the equipment "
KQQL IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 10:04 PM   #13
Ziegelsteinfaust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,631
Re: 20 mpg or not?

I don't think you get past 17 with those tires. There to wide, and heavy for mpg.

Plus you 14 bolt is a heavy girl at 550 pounds, and you'll need to do the disk conversion for rotational weight reductions. The disk conversion brings your 14 bolt down to a slim 475 pounds roughly.

Plus I think a 455 Buick will put down the torque you need for those tires if you need them, and the short stroke you need for mpg. I had a bolt-on "except headers" Electra for a minute with one, and 2.73 gears. It would regularly get 19mpg cruising 70 with the cruise one. I have a spare sitting in my garage from when I got the car, and I am on the fence of putting it in my C20.
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 10:10 PM   #14
meatwagon83
Registered User
 
meatwagon83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Preble county ohio
Posts: 1,914
Re: 20 mpg or not?

not 20, maybe 16 or 17 if you keep you foot out of it
__________________
"DON'T TOUCH THE TRIM!!"-Early Kyler
meatwagon83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 12:46 AM   #15
piecesparts
Parts and more parts
 
piecesparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
Re: 20 mpg or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Seymore View Post
I suspect no.

I can get 20-22 ish with my truck, which is a 1/2 ton shortbox with a 4.3, 3.73 gears and overdrive.

You've got your work cut out for you, especially with those 4.11 gears.

K

Where do you drive to get that good of mileage? city/ highway/what speeds/etc...?
__________________
Frank
piecesparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 02:05 AM   #16
Oilbrnr
Registered User
 
Oilbrnr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 390
Re: 20 mpg or not?

Yes, if idling off of a cliff into a mile deep crevasse.

Otherwise, no.
__________________
-Don-

'66 C10 w/factory A/C
'77 Cheyenne K5 350/465/205
'80 Custom Deluxe K20 350/465/205
'04 Denali XL
'05 DMax CCLB 4x


Have a Hickey Sidewinder Winch and need the owners/install manual? Send me a PM with your email address and I'll forward you a .pdf
Oilbrnr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 02:46 AM   #17
74 stepside
Registered User
 
74 stepside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 815
Re: 20 mpg or not?

With a Gearvendor added to that 700R4 you might get close, but realistically I dont see it. Heavy truck plus its lifted, thats a plow in the wind. No aerodynamics.
74 stepside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 06:17 AM   #18
D13
Registered User
 
D13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Memphis MI
Posts: 1,851
Re: 20 mpg or not?

My 87 R10 gets 23mpg mixed, would get 26+ at 55 on the highway. But I'm running a 6.2 diesel, no turbo. SLOW.
__________________
1987 2 ton
1982 250/TH350 beater in progress
Dad's 1981 3/4 L6 3 on tree posi and no options, awaiting restoration or scrapping
Plus a mess o' tractors
D13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 07:02 AM   #19
tucsonjwt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,189
Re: 20 mpg or not?

For reference, the best I got out of a V8 was 18.5 highway on a 2010 4.8 GMC extended cab with 3.23 gear. On a 2010 V6 LWB Silveado I got 20 city/24 highway, but very little power. For gas mileage I think you should consider an economy car, and drive the truck sparingly.
tucsonjwt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 07:51 AM   #20
Keith Seymore
Registered User
 
Keith Seymore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,226
Re: 20 mpg or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by piecesparts View Post
Where do you drive to get that good of mileage? city/ highway/what speeds/etc...?
Roughly 30 mile commute (one way); mostly expressway, as fast as traffic will allow (my goal is 73 mph, probably ends up at 65 mph or so on average).

K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly
1979-1986
GM Full Size Truck Engineering
1986 - 2019
Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/
Keith Seymore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 10:32 AM   #21
SSC's76
No No
 
SSC's76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pueblo Colorado
Posts: 1,781
Re: 20 mpg or not?

the engine cam and head combo is capable of doing it but like others have said you need to overcome the weight of the truck. i would suspect you will see 10 and 14 out of that combo in that truck. I would personally choose a more tq oriented camshaft it would provide much better results with your rear gear and trans your working with. anything that makes power from idle to 4500 would be great depending on your cruise rpm if it made max tq 500 + or - in that range thats where you will see the best results
__________________
1976 Custom Deluxe SWB Med FMB.3/4 Drop.
Gen VI 454, Muncie HD 3 speed With Modified OE Hurst Shifter, 3.73 12 bolt, GMPP HO roller cam, Hooker headers, Performer intake with modified Q-jet, Accel distributor. Best 1/4 12.3 @108. Funnest run 19.84 @88 full 1/4 mile burn out.
1997 K1500 ext cab 5.7 stock except muffler
SSC's76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 10:51 AM   #22
mrhino
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,223
Re: 20 mpg or not?

I knew the weight of the truck would always be my downfall. Tire width was something I hadn't considered but it will add to the problem. Iv been playing with cam grinds. to find the best torque numbers. I mentioned the vortech cam cause it something iv had laying around and it it didnt seam too bad for bottom end torque and still be TBI friendly. 500 ftlb would be nice but im not sure I can do it with those heads. The engine is not together yet. so things can still be changed.
mrhino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 12:35 PM   #23
rs72z
Registered User
 
rs72z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Emory TX
Posts: 900
Re: 20 mpg or not?

I can get 18 on mostly highway with my ccsb dually. I have a 5.3, 4l60e and 4.10 gears. I doubt 20 will ever happen old school.
I would like to get mine out on a long tripp to see what it will do.
__________________
___________________

78 ccsb dually
5.3
4l60e
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=491551
rs72z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 12:38 PM   #24
camok10
Registered User
 
camok10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: dansville mi
Posts: 87
Re: 20 mpg or not?

I was averaging 16mpg out of my k5. I went from an average of 10-12 stock with 273's and 32's to a 4" lift a 44hd and a 14ff with 410's on 35's. it was just a mild tbi 350 with a low end cam, intake, high flow cat with dual 2 1/2" straight pipes off it.

I don't see 20, but I'd imagine around 15 possible out of it
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
98 K1500 ecsb
84 C10- 350/350- first vehicle still have 30 some latter
82 C10- 6.2l diesel 700r4
camok10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 12:58 PM   #25
86c20
Registered User
 
86c20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: edgartown mass
Posts: 852
Re: 20 mpg or not?

well not saying you will get 20 but there are a few things that you need to do to help get it there. 1. gear it right. lot of guys over gear there trucks. find where your power band is and try to get your cruise speed in it. most stock small blocks are around1900ish to2300ish. not saying it is the most poweer but it is not luged down so much you have to shift alll the time. 2. air dam under the bumper. makes a big diff. my buddy did it on a dump truck and he gaind .25 mpg on averag. on a pickup i would think .5ish. 3. timing. timing is a big part or eco. in my c 20 the more retarded the wores i get. agian it is about freeing up power more then making power. 4.narrow tires. pizza cutters are the best. and free up all rolling resistanc. brake adj. should be right also. 5. elc fan. again freeing up power. did it in my monte ganied about .5 on the avg. 6. lock up trq convert. is better. standerd trans is best.

on the highway with my c20 i get 20's at 65-70 but my truck has stock size bfg at. and a crate350 that is 260hp and i run reg gas. good luck
__________________
1986 c20 "the hillbilly" 350 sm465 3.42gears 21mpg at 70mph
1985 k30 "the ice cream truck from hell" no rust az truck
197-8??? c30 "ramp truck" 454
1978 monte carlo 350 350th with 2.73 gears. no rust. sc car
86c20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com