Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-01-2013, 05:15 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rochester, KENT
Posts: 10,576
|
65 with 210 cubic inch and 3 speed ? Opinions?
I started a thread earlier with this truck in the question, possibly badly worded.
I found a badly worded ad in a magazine last night, and was wondering just how "bad" this combo in a 65 long Fleet would be. 210 cubic inch 6 cylinder and a 3 speed gearbox. I am thinking of things like towing my teardrop trailer and the occasiona load to be lugged. What would this engine and box combo be like to live with on modern roads? What sort of performance and speeds are they able to deliver? The price in UK terms is what would be called reasonable at £5000 which is about $7600 BEFORE YOU GET HAPPY..... remember there is about $3800 actually involved in importing, shipping and customs etc costs to bring a truck to the UK, so a USA truck has to still be landed at a price that makes sense for a Brit to be interested. My question is around the engine and gearbox combo, and what they will be like towing a Teardrop caravan, Thanks for any replies and help.
__________________
MY BUILD LINK: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...585901]Redneck Express - 1966 C10 Short Fleetside MY USA ROADTRIPS http://forum.retro-rides.org/thread/...2018-humdinger IF YOU CAN'T FIX IT WITH A HAMMER, YOU'VE GOT AN ELECTRICAL PROBLEM MATE. |
04-01-2013, 05:57 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newport, South Wales, UK
Posts: 4
|
Re: 65 with 210 cubic inch and 3 speed ? Opinions?
No experience, but a Rover V8 is 215ci to put it into perspective. If you hate it put a 350 in. I've seen V8 ones already over here for that sort of money tho.
Posted via Mobile Device |
04-01-2013, 06:20 AM | #3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rochester, KENT
Posts: 10,576
|
Re: 65 with 210 cubic inch and 3 speed ? Opinions?
Quote:
Just cut my lawn for the fist time this year, not much to cut, but typically tatty after winter, and I will be away for 3 weeks. I know of a V8 stashed away elsewhere in the country. What I am trying to find out is if these 210ci engines are worth keeping in the truck to do the stuff I want to do, I love a V8 but will never race or drag etc, so it is about understanding if they are good enough to just leave alone, or would it need replacing to run with modern traffic. Ideally I want to cruise at 70mph or 120km/h and be able to still overtake the guy doing 65 in the slow lane Thanks for the reply. If you hear of any sensibly priced trucks, please dromp me a PM.
__________________
MY BUILD LINK: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...585901]Redneck Express - 1966 C10 Short Fleetside MY USA ROADTRIPS http://forum.retro-rides.org/thread/...2018-humdinger IF YOU CAN'T FIX IT WITH A HAMMER, YOU'VE GOT AN ELECTRICAL PROBLEM MATE. |
|
04-01-2013, 06:36 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newport, South Wales, UK
Posts: 4
|
Re: 65 with 210 cubic inch and 3 speed ? Opinions?
I'm sticking a 2005 5.3 ally truck motor in mine once I get round to it. Better weld a floor in it first tho! I'd be more concerned about the 3 speed than the engine, can't see that being fun at motorway speeds.
Posted via Mobile Device |
04-01-2013, 07:48 AM | #5 |
1965 Chevy C10, 2005 4.8L/4l60
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 8,546
|
Re: 65 with 210 cubic inch and 3 speed ? Opinions?
I would go with the 230/250 motor and put an NV3500 or a t5 behind it. that way you could cruise at 70+ and get reasonable fuel mileage with out breaking the bank.
__________________
Clyde65 Rebuild of Clyde http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post8338184 69 Aristocrat Lo Liner build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post7561684 support our troops! |
04-01-2013, 08:11 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: fayetteville nc
Posts: 10,338
|
Re: 65 with 210 cubic inch and 3 speed ? Opinions?
Never heard of a chevy or GMC 210 engine, possibly they mean the 230 or the 250?
__________________
1963 Short bed step side SBW 427 big block and borg warner T-16 HD 3 speed manual http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=519869 1963 Short bed fleetside BBW 348 1st gen big block w/Powerglide http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=619024 1964 Short bed trailer |
04-01-2013, 09:50 AM | #7 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rochester, KENT
Posts: 10,576
|
Re: 65 with 210 cubic inch and 3 speed ? Opinions?
Quote:
I could not get a lot of clear answers out of him. Seems the truck has whitewalls on, but he turned them inside out as he feels its a "commercial" truck and should not have whitewalls. he seems to be under the impression that it was a retired Airforce truck from a German US base. He said 210, but I guess it could be anything.
__________________
MY BUILD LINK: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...585901]Redneck Express - 1966 C10 Short Fleetside MY USA ROADTRIPS http://forum.retro-rides.org/thread/...2018-humdinger IF YOU CAN'T FIX IT WITH A HAMMER, YOU'VE GOT AN ELECTRICAL PROBLEM MATE. |
|
04-01-2013, 10:03 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: fayetteville nc
Posts: 10,338
|
Re: 65 with 210 cubic inch and 3 speed ? Opinions?
If its original or at least period correct, its a 230 or a 250. There was also a larger 292 inline six that was used also, and its much easier to tell from the 230 or 250. Probably came from Ramstein AFB in Germany, would be my guess.
__________________
1963 Short bed step side SBW 427 big block and borg warner T-16 HD 3 speed manual http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=519869 1963 Short bed fleetside BBW 348 1st gen big block w/Powerglide http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=619024 1964 Short bed trailer |
04-01-2013, 11:18 AM | #9 |
Senior Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 8,356
|
Re: 65 with 210 cubic inch and 3 speed ? Opinions?
I’m not sure you can obtain any real meaningful input about how well the engine/trans combination will perform until you find out for sure what it is. It might not even be a Chevy six.
I’d be more concerned about “it has some rust but has been resprayed”. No matter where you live, rebuilding or replacing an engine/transmission is always less work and less expensive that repairing rust. Extensive rust can gobble up a budget faster than anything else, and ultimately kill enthusiasm for the entire project. The bad part about fresh paint is that you have no idea what is under it. Sometimes it’s a better bargain to buy a vehicle that needs a new paint job, so you can be certain of the underlying condition. It also helps to check the usual rust areas with a refrigerator type vinyl magnet to see if extensive body filler has been slathered on. Those magnets aren’t very strong and won’t scratch the paint (possibly irritating the owner). If they won’t stick at all there’s probably a lot of filler underneath, indicating a cheap poorly done repair. Spend as much as you can afford to obtain a truck that's as rust free as possible, and you'll avoid years of annoyance and repairs. Good luck on your search.
__________________
My Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444502 |
04-01-2013, 12:45 PM | #10 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rochester, KENT
Posts: 10,576
|
Re: 65 with 210 cubic inch and 3 speed ? Opinions?
Quote:
Thanks for the reply Mark, much appreciated.
__________________
MY BUILD LINK: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...585901]Redneck Express - 1966 C10 Short Fleetside MY USA ROADTRIPS http://forum.retro-rides.org/thread/...2018-humdinger IF YOU CAN'T FIX IT WITH A HAMMER, YOU'VE GOT AN ELECTRICAL PROBLEM MATE. |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|