The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-22-2013, 03:11 AM   #1
65 wonton
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Highland, KS
Posts: 124
Hump vs transmission and other related questions

I have a 66 with, I think, a high hump. It can be seen here on post #18.

I am vasilating between a 4l60 transmission (that came attached to the ls1 from my 98 T/A, which I already have), a T56 or a NV 4500.

Hydraulics doesn't scare me. wiring, cabling, speed-o, crossmember issues are all a wash. I know that I can acquire bolt-up transmissions for the LS! in all 3 models (at least the T-56 and 4l60).

One question is:
1. What are the physical size/footprint differences between the 3 transmissions?
2. Will the firewall and floor take any of these without alteration (no issue with the shifter location for me)?


The LS will not likely go above 500 HP intentionally. The original truck was manual 4 speed. The steering column will be changed (tilt) anyway. 2wd. Daily driver.
A. Is there a difference as far as sturdiness of the transmission for the LS1, power wise?

I know that there will be a question of differences in cost, $600-1400 and driving preferences Stick vs manual and am not asking that.

I just haven't seen these transmissions in real life or side by side to have an idea of fit or experience to know function.

Thanks,

Dave, this should be as easy as 4,5,6.
65 wonton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 12:27 PM   #2
theastronaut
Registered User
 
theastronaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Anderson SC
Posts: 3,901
Re: Hump vs transmission and other related questions

I don't know about the automatics, but here is how the 5.3/T56 combo fits in my '66 with a low hump floor and F-body oil pan. It's lower and farther back than most swaps since I wanted better weight placement. You'd have plenty of room with a high hump.







Clearance around the T56.






Header clearance.





theastronaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 05:56 PM   #3
66Submarine
Registered User
 
66Submarine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dallas, GA
Posts: 1,497
Re: Hump vs transmission and other related questions

Those are all very different transmissions. NV4500 is a wide ratio truck trans, T-56 is a close ratio double OD sports car trans. And a 4L60, well, I'm not a fan. It seems like some people are using them with success, though. In stock form they are a POS, IMO.
66Submarine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 10:27 PM   #4
gofastnut
Registered User
 
gofastnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Williams, CA
Posts: 760
Re: Hump vs transmission and other related questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by 66Submarine View Post
... A 4L60, well, I'm not a fan. It seems like some people are using them with success, though. In stock form they are a POS, IMO.
Yep, stock they're just big paperweights.
But, rebuilt they're NICE! Although it's about $1500 just for the rebuild....
__________________
Jeff
96 C3500 Crew Cab Long bed (Waiting on Cool Name)
64 C-10 shortie stepside, "Ole Brownie"
C-10 Club
My achingly slow build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=508345
gofastnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2013, 03:30 AM   #5
65 wonton
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Highland, KS
Posts: 124
Re: Hump vs transmission and other related questions

theastronaut, thanks for the pictures. There does seem to be a lot of room that I never would have expected.

66Submarine and gofastnut, thanks for the reply. See, that's what makes this place. Other sites have raved the 4l60 as the greatest automatic transmission ever built! Maybe it was the manufacturer's site or something.

The only other thing I've heard about the 4l60 is that the ls1 torque rips it off the rear t-mount when romped.

So does the $1500 mean post acquisition?

I have 2 dodge cummins, one with a G-6 and one with a NV 5600. I like them both but assumed that neither would fit without cab modification. What other choices are out there?
65 wonton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2013, 10:17 AM   #6
theastronaut
Registered User
 
theastronaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Anderson SC
Posts: 3,901
Re: Hump vs transmission and other related questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by 65 wonton View Post
theastronaut, thanks for the pictures. There does seem to be a lot of room that I never would have expected.
Don't forget that that's with the engine dropped down right on the crossmember with about 1/2" clearance to the oil pan. That will make header clearance tight, but I'm planning on building my own headers to solve that. Stock manifolds may clear though. You already have a F-body oil pan to help drop the engine lower. As far back as my engine is, the valve covers are close to the firewall but there is room to remove them. I'm relocating the coil packs so I haven't checked to see if they clear the firewall. A stock T56 is rated at 450 ft/lb and they've been known to hold up to more than that so you should be good there. If you're planning on keeping the bench seat then you'll need a shifter relocation kit from Keisler.
theastronaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com