|
04-04-2014, 10:36 PM
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greeley colorado
Posts: 1,360
|
Re: New to me 1965 C20
I think the turbo 400 was 66 only but the 327 was a mid year 65 option
|
|
|
|
05-11-2014, 12:13 PM
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: west coast
Posts: 3,396
|
Re: New to me 1965 C20
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-11-2014, 12:42 PM
|
#28 |
|
But Found Her 25yrs Later!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Oregon City, Oregon
Posts: 10,530
|
Re: New to me 1965 C20
I think it was LtBurb in another thread that said to leave the factory mats alone in these trucks. If you try to remove it, you'll tear it. By the looks of your truck, I would guess everything under the mat is fine. Don't touch it.
__________________
I lost my 65 - Found it 25 years later: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=426650 66 C20 Service Truck: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=428035 |
|
|
|
|
05-11-2014, 03:12 PM
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Clinton township, MI
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: New to me 1965 C20
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
