05-15-2014, 12:43 AM | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,778
|
Re: inline 6 vs. 283
I too have had great results with 283s. They become a peppy efficient motor with a few conservative mods and they are economical, like any small block. I love 'em but next time I'm doing a 292 for the cool factor.
|
05-15-2014, 12:56 AM | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: corktown,mi.
Posts: 5,194
|
Re: inline 6 vs. 283
alright its settled I6(292) cool factor is a must, and i need the challenge of finding block,heads and all the componets. thks for all the much needed posts i've learned alot about the topic...
|
05-15-2014, 05:04 AM | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: corktown,mi.
Posts: 5,194
|
Re: inline 6 vs. 283
i found a least 4 292 in various stages of dis-repair, but i can handle it. once i have a free moment i will find out as much as i can. it would b nice to have a bone yard close. come to think of it there is a place i got my first sbc 400 from over 20yrs ago, ima try them today!!!
|
05-15-2014, 10:56 AM | #29 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 10,384
|
Re: inline 6 vs. 283
LOL! Find one close to you and you won't have to try an lug my 292 back to your place. I was gonna ask...You gonna be selling that 283? Make sure it runs? Don't know what the heck I'd use it for...but heck. lol
__________________
1966 Chevy C10 "Project Two Tone" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=596643 1964 GMC "Crustine" semi-build:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=665056 My youtube channel. Username "Military Chevy": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_h...fzpcUXyK_5-uiw |
05-15-2014, 12:26 PM | #30 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: WNC
Posts: 226
|
Re: inline 6 vs. 283
Quote:
But when my`63 that came with a non-stock 283 needed a rebuild I found a roller cam 305, did rings, bearings, timing set, etc. stuck in a used LT1 cam, block huggers, HEI, Eddy Perfomer intake and 500cfm 4bbl.; with a T5 and 373 rear behind. It's all shagged out by 5k RPMs but I'm not a red-lining-it driver anyway. I think it makes a better truck engine with lowdown torque. I use my truck as a truck and wanted better MPGs more than I wanted originality. I can tell it gets better milage but I won't have real numbers until I get a working speedometer. |
|
05-15-2014, 06:55 PM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,778
|
Re: inline 6 vs. 283
It's true a 305 gets no respect, but it sounds like you guys got some cool ones. In researching my 283 build I found using 305 heads to be a nice upgrade. This naturally led me to wanting to know more about 305s. They have the same stroke as a 350 but smaller pistons and many people like yourselves have built some cool efficient motors which are quick and fun, and at 4 bucks a gallon out here in CA a 305 is a great option.
|
05-15-2014, 11:04 PM | #32 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: WNC
Posts: 226
|
Re: inline 6 vs. 283
I drive mine like a low gruntin diesel in town, starting off in 2nd unless I have a load or upgrade and chugging around corners in 3rd without lugging. I played with the timing advance and with an A/F gauge, going for that snappy throttle response. On the highway it's turning 2300 @ 65 so that's the target sweet spot.
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|