The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-15-2014, 12:43 AM   #26
AcampoDave
Registered User
 
AcampoDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,778
Re: inline 6 vs. 283

I too have had great results with 283s. They become a peppy efficient motor with a few conservative mods and they are economical, like any small block. I love 'em but next time I'm doing a 292 for the cool factor.
AcampoDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 12:56 AM   #27
pimpston65
Registered User
 
pimpston65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: corktown,mi.
Posts: 5,194
Re: inline 6 vs. 283

alright its settled I6(292) cool factor is a must, and i need the challenge of finding block,heads and all the componets. thks for all the much needed posts i've learned alot about the topic...
pimpston65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 05:04 AM   #28
pimpston65
Registered User
 
pimpston65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: corktown,mi.
Posts: 5,194
Re: inline 6 vs. 283

i found a least 4 292 in various stages of dis-repair, but i can handle it. once i have a free moment i will find out as much as i can. it would b nice to have a bone yard close. come to think of it there is a place i got my first sbc 400 from over 20yrs ago, ima try them today!!!
pimpston65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 10:56 AM   #29
TJ's Chevy
Registered User
 
TJ's Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 10,384
Re: inline 6 vs. 283

LOL! Find one close to you and you won't have to try an lug my 292 back to your place. I was gonna ask...You gonna be selling that 283? Make sure it runs? Don't know what the heck I'd use it for...but heck. lol
__________________
1966 Chevy C10 "Project Two Tone" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=596643
1964 GMC "Crustine" semi-build:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=665056
My youtube channel. Username "Military Chevy": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_h...fzpcUXyK_5-uiw
TJ's Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 12:26 PM   #30
Mackie
Registered User
 
Mackie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: WNC
Posts: 226
Re: inline 6 vs. 283

Quote:
Originally Posted by 63burban View Post
If you are going to use it on trips, I would use a 305 with stock heads, RV cam, small Edelbrock carb, hei ignition, 2" exhaust. 700r4 trans with 3:55 or 3:42 rear end gears. I have set up this combination in several vehicles and have very good luck with power and mileage. In my 56 Chevy Belair I am getting 22mpg at 70mph on the hwy, my 63 Chevy C10 shortbox is getting 18mpg at 70mph on the hwy. All the power and torque you need.
If you are running around locally, a six and three speed is great and a lot of fun, or a six and turbo 200 trans. Just my experience.
305's get no love.
But when my`63 that came with a non-stock 283 needed a rebuild I found a roller cam 305, did rings, bearings, timing set, etc. stuck in a used LT1 cam, block huggers, HEI, Eddy Perfomer intake and 500cfm 4bbl.; with a T5 and 373 rear behind. It's all shagged out by 5k RPMs but I'm not a red-lining-it driver anyway. I think it makes a better truck engine with lowdown torque.

I use my truck as a truck and wanted better MPGs more than I wanted originality. I can tell it gets better milage but I won't have real numbers until I get a working speedometer.
Mackie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 06:55 PM   #31
AcampoDave
Registered User
 
AcampoDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,778
Re: inline 6 vs. 283

It's true a 305 gets no respect, but it sounds like you guys got some cool ones. In researching my 283 build I found using 305 heads to be a nice upgrade. This naturally led me to wanting to know more about 305s. They have the same stroke as a 350 but smaller pistons and many people like yourselves have built some cool efficient motors which are quick and fun, and at 4 bucks a gallon out here in CA a 305 is a great option.
AcampoDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 11:04 PM   #32
Mackie
Registered User
 
Mackie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: WNC
Posts: 226
Re: inline 6 vs. 283

I drive mine like a low gruntin diesel in town, starting off in 2nd unless I have a load or upgrade and chugging around corners in 3rd without lugging. I played with the timing advance and with an A/F gauge, going for that snappy throttle response. On the highway it's turning 2300 @ 65 so that's the target sweet spot.
Mackie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com