05-04-2016, 09:10 PM | #1 |
56 - autocross
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 1,121
|
Question?
Why do you think they put cab mount brackets/arm on these chassis instead of just bolting directly the cab directly to the frame?
|
05-04-2016, 09:40 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Doodah Kansas
Posts: 7,774
|
Re: Question?
torque!
torque is force x distance, you can think of it as leverage or advantage when, the farther you are from the point force is applied, the more torque you can apply. if they mounted the cab to the frame , every part of the body outside of the frame would be subject to torque, leading to doors that dont shut, warped floors, etc, because the weight applied at the door frame would have a force applied between the door frame and the body mount. so they kick it out as far as they can, using plate steel instead of flimsy sheetmetal, minimize the torque. its why they went away from the center cab mounts too.
__________________
the mass of men live lives of quiet desperation if there is a problem, I can have it. new project WAYNE http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=844393 |
05-04-2016, 09:43 PM | #3 |
56 - autocross
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 1,121
|
Re: Question?
Ok, good reason. So why are the rear ones closer to the chassis than the front ones?
|
05-04-2016, 10:03 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Doodah Kansas
Posts: 7,774
|
Re: Question?
its only slightly, more stepping and pushing and shifting in the front would be my guess
__________________
the mass of men live lives of quiet desperation if there is a problem, I can have it. new project WAYNE http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=844393 |
05-04-2016, 10:05 PM | #5 |
56 - autocross
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 1,121
|
Re: Question?
Thanks for the info.
One more question. Why are those arms sloped down instead of being level? Lower the cab? |
05-04-2016, 10:10 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Doodah Kansas
Posts: 7,774
|
Re: Question?
they are level with the frame.
__________________
the mass of men live lives of quiet desperation if there is a problem, I can have it. new project WAYNE http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=844393 |
05-04-2016, 10:25 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,711
|
Re: Question?
I want some of what Joe's smokin.
I'd have to say the short version is that the engineers decided that with the wider cab on the AD trucks they wanted the cab supports further outboard Which also saved having to put much stronger supports under the floor. The other thing is that on the assembly line it may have eased installing the cab on the frame having the supports out where it was easy to connect things.
__________________
Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club. My ongoing truck projects: 48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six. 71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant. 77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around. |
05-04-2016, 10:28 PM | #8 |
56 - autocross
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 1,121
|
Re: Question?
Most of the ones that I have seen on our year trucks are sloped down.
|
05-04-2016, 10:29 PM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,711
|
Re: Question?
Quote:
That is real common on V8 swap trucks with the stock frame that run and automatic. It's also the reason a lot of trucks don't have the hood fitted up right. The cab will sag until the bottom of the floor is sitting on the frame rails.
__________________
Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club. My ongoing truck projects: 48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six. 71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant. 77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around. |
|
05-04-2016, 10:31 PM | #10 |
56 - autocross
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 1,121
|
Re: Question?
That's interesting but I have not seen one that was not sloped.
|
05-04-2016, 11:07 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Doodah Kansas
Posts: 7,774
|
Re: Question?
well, the one in your original post is flat. so now you have seen two (the one I posted)
The one I posted is a 53, is it possible you are talking about TF trucks? 55-59?
__________________
the mass of men live lives of quiet desperation if there is a problem, I can have it. new project WAYNE http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=844393 |
05-04-2016, 11:34 PM | #12 |
56 - autocross
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 1,121
|
Re: Question?
Yep, the one I first posted is flat. I dont know what year it is, but I think that last one is the 55-59.
|
05-05-2016, 07:08 AM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 196
|
Re: Question?
The original post pic is a 47-55.1 mid body mount for a suburban and panel truck. It is level when it comes off the chassis. Similar to front body/cab mount but is narrower and smaller scale.
If you need any other info on them, let me know. I have a set sitting the in the garage waiting to be put back on the chassis.
__________________
55.1 GMC Suburban Hydramatic |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|