|
04-15-2004, 05:53 AM
|
#2 |
|
user # 2756
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
Posts: 4,612
|
The 203 is a full time case unless it has been converted for part-time operation. It really would not be worth the swap from the 241 to 203. Your 241 will be fine iregardless of what rear end you have, now go changing the power out of your motor or the size of your tires or have a reckless driving style then your whole drivetrain could need up-grading.
I personally don't like the auto hubs but with the manuals your know when they are locked in or free wheeling. The 203 is probably stronger (steel to aluminum) But it also has a chain the 241 has a lower ratio and if you perform routine maint on the 241 it will be fine. Also a 203 never came behind a 700R4 tranny so you would have to engineer or modify or purchase an adapter(if one is available).
__________________
1970 K25, 8' stepside bed 350/465/205 44 up front, 60 in the rear 4.10s rolling on 33" Dunlop MTs 1986 K5, 350/465/208 Dana 60/14 bolt from a cucv 36" Super Swampers TSL/SX 1983 K20 w/ CUCV axles, 350/700R4/208 sitting on 37" Goodyears 1986 M1031 6.2 diesel, TH400/NP205 locker in the rear and a LS in the front, all stock for now..... 1986 K30, 350/400/205 dana 60 and 14 bolt. I kept the drivetrain. Body/bad and chassis are gone. 1981 K30, 350/465/205 dana 60 and dually 14 bolt. Has a G80, and a flat bed. Going to replace the flat bed. 1985 K20, 350/400/208 10 bolt and SF 14 bolt. I wonder where I can find some 1 tons. Hmmmmm 
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode