|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
05-31-2011, 10:18 AM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,080
|
Re: 82 front suspension on a 66 questions
Just to throw this out there in case someone doesn't know this info, the 230/250 6's use the same mm tower as the sbc. The large 6 (292) uses a different pass side from what I recall.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
|
|
05-31-2011, 10:39 AM
|
#2 |
|
But Found Her 25yrs Later!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Oregon City, Oregon
Posts: 10,530
|
Re: 82 front suspension on a 66 questions
I used the original brackets and mounts.
If I remember correctly, the newer mounts got in the way of the down dump ramshorn exhaust manifold. Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
I lost my 65 - Found it 25 years later: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=426650 66 C20 Service Truck: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=428035 |
|
|
|
|
05-31-2011, 07:23 PM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ca
Posts: 82
|
Re: 82 front suspension on a 66 questions
I think I may just go with the tublar towers with clam shell motor mounts. I know that will bolt into the top of frame. I may need to drill x member. I also heard the tublar ones move engine forward a bit to help the hei dist clear the firewall. Drawback, $$$$$ money tight around here!
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
