Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-25-2004, 10:21 PM | #1 |
Black 72 Chevy
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 662
|
Carb change from Q to Edelbrock
Hi guys and gals.
I want to replace my Q jet carb with an Edelbrock 1406 carb that I bought from the net. I'm also going to replace the stock intake with an edelbrock torker 2. My question is, where do you connect the distributor vacuum advance. The Q carb has the connection next to the choke but the edelbrock carb has none. Check the pics. Pics did not show, will have to resize. A.P. |
07-25-2004, 10:31 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Grant, Alabama
Posts: 504
|
There should be a few small vacuum ports on the front of the carb near the idle mixture screws. Check for a line that has vacuum above idle speed, that is your vacuum advance port.
__________________
72 Chevy C20, SOLD (Dang it.) 09 Challanger RT six speed in all black. 74 Datsun 710 wagon, all 1.8 liters of screaming Datsun power. 73 C10 long bed, 350/350 combo, nice shape. |
07-25-2004, 11:02 PM | #3 |
Black 72 Chevy
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 662
|
72C203503ONTHETREE
Thanks for your help. I Will check as soon as I install it. A.P. |
07-25-2004, 11:11 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: huntington,texas,united states
Posts: 399
|
yea it should be the left port.
__________________
1972 chevy long bed. Currently under construction!! Bagged, 383/700r4. |
07-25-2004, 11:23 PM | #5 |
Don't say "Oops!", Doctor
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 677
|
One thing that might help is to hit the Edelbrock web site. They've got PDF versions of the 1406 installation manual and the 1406 rebuild manual. They helped me a bunch when I rebuilt my 1406 and installed it a few weeks ago. Good luck with that carb!
__________________
'Mutt 1968 CST LWB: R.I.P. 1967 Chevelle: TPI 454 beast 1967 C10 SWB: Claimed when Bumpster didn't put it on his list |
07-26-2004, 01:50 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 2,745
|
If you engine is stock, I would use a different intake manifold. The torker 2 is a single plane, not real great for a stock engine. If you have an engine that needs it though, then hey, sounds good to me.
__________________
70 C/10 Light Red 350/TH350, HEI, Duals w/40 series Flows, 91 seat, LED taillights 99 Pontiac S/C GTP, SLP Ram Air hood, GMPP Konis & springs 95 Neon ACR, MP PCM, AFX UDP, 3.0 CAI |
07-26-2004, 04:22 AM | #7 |
Black 72 Chevy
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 662
|
Thank you all. I do have a stock engine and according to the Edelbrock web site the torker 2 intake is for high-performance. Well, I haven't taken the stock intake off the engine. I will just replace the carbs.
A.P. |
07-26-2004, 05:57 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Other Maine!
Posts: 2,236
|
A stock motor would still gain in horsepower and torque with single plane. It is meant
for wide open throttle gain.Still the weight reduction alone would prompt me to change from the stock cast iron. This intake for sure is what racers want. A dual plane would be better in your case. Good luck however you proceed.
__________________
1968 Chevy 4x4 307 4 speed |
07-26-2004, 07:14 AM | #9 |
Don't say "Oops!", Doctor
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 677
|
I think the point that some folks are trying to make is that you'll need to get either an adapter or a new intake when performing the swap. The Q-Jet is spread bore whereas the Edelbrock is square bore. Adapters will work or you can do what many folks do (including myself) and replace the intake while you're at it.
__________________
'Mutt 1968 CST LWB: R.I.P. 1967 Chevelle: TPI 454 beast 1967 C10 SWB: Claimed when Bumpster didn't put it on his list |
07-26-2004, 10:36 AM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Grant, Alabama
Posts: 504
|
The edelbrock has two sets of holes so you can install it on either a Holley style intake or a Q jet intake. The Torquer intake is not that great, the Victor Jr. is actually better since you get a lot of top end but dont lose much bottom end, the standard ports arent that big so it doesnt lose very much velocity. It can be ported quite a bit to use better heads and cams though. The Performer RPM and RPM Air Gap would be the best compromise though. I am using a RPM with a 600 cfm Carter and a 1105 Summit cam kit on my 350 that is otherwise stock except for roller rockers and stud girdles. It works well even if its in a 3/4 ton truck with a three on the tree.
__________________
72 Chevy C20, SOLD (Dang it.) 09 Challanger RT six speed in all black. 74 Datsun 710 wagon, all 1.8 liters of screaming Datsun power. 73 C10 long bed, 350/350 combo, nice shape. |
07-26-2004, 12:37 PM | #11 |
The Blazer King
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Valrico, Fl (Tampa)
Posts: 1,212
|
I asked the same question the other day in the Engine Forum.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php3?t=112705 I used the Drivers side port and it seems to work very well.
__________________
72 2wd Blazer. Its the superbichinest, megacoolinest, superflowinest. |
07-26-2004, 02:36 PM | #12 | |
Don't say "Oops!", Doctor
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 677
|
Quote:
__________________
'Mutt 1968 CST LWB: R.I.P. 1967 Chevelle: TPI 454 beast 1967 C10 SWB: Claimed when Bumpster didn't put it on his list |
|
07-26-2004, 06:08 PM | #13 |
Old Skool Club
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Benton, AR "The Heart of Arkansas"
Posts: 10,880
|
I just used the Performer intake, with my 1405. Later, changed to the Edelbrock Q-Jet. No complaints.
__________________
Member Nr. 2770 '96 GMC Sportside; 4.3/SLT - Daily driven....constantly needs washed. '69 C-10 SWB; 350/TH400 - in limbo The older I get, the better I was. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|