03-03-2008, 02:54 AM | #1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Rearend question
What do you guy think about using a f*rd 8.8 Explorer rear end in a 47-53?
They come cheap with disc brakes and limited slip with a nice array of gear ratios. Any one with experience running on of these? |
03-03-2008, 03:45 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Central Coast, CA.
Posts: 1,202
|
Re: Rearend question
You said the "f" word.
__________________
Mom's 1954 (TBI 5.7/700R4/14 bolt 4:10) 5 Chevrolet window 3/4 ton long bed Pick up build thread ->http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...d.php?t=228674 My 1954 (TPI 5.7/700R4/10 bolt 3:73) Chevrolet 5 window 1/2 ton short bed Pick up build thread->http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...3&goto=newpost 1960 (400/T350/?) Apache 10 short/fleet side-big window 1973 (TPI 5.7/700R4/14 bolt 4:10 w DANA 60 front) Chevrolet Cheyenne 4X4 2013 (Vortec 5.3/6-speed 6L90 automatic) Sierra LT CREW CAB Doing my part to warm the globe |
03-03-2008, 04:54 AM | #3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Rearend question
Yea i know i said the "f" word but at the price for these rear ends ill just grind the oval off.
|
03-03-2008, 05:43 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 20
|
Re: Rearend question
i have one on my 56. i haven't run with it yet but they are supposed to be pretty strong and are a good width. mine is out of a 97 exploder with disk brakes and 3.73's
__________________
1956 Chevy 3100 Big Window Fuel Injected 6.0 Corvette Suspension Four Link Rear |
03-03-2008, 01:16 PM | #5 |
polishing a turd
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 674
|
Re: Rearend question
nothing wrong with those. the should have a trac-loc with factory 31 spline axles in them.
__________________
59 chevy apache 31 4x4 - my project: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8668512 53 buick special - straight 8 sled - blow through turbo 47 gmc - flatbed hot rod build 99 ford econoline e350 - 4x4 converted family roadtrip/overlanding rig AKA 'Monstervan' AKA 'Daddy-Van' |
03-04-2008, 09:17 PM | #6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Rearend question
Thanks guys good to know. I'm going to pick up one out of a 96 exploder with discs, trac lock and 3.73's for $200, which is less than the disc brake coversion cost for my 10 bolt.
|
03-05-2008, 02:20 AM | #7 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Phoenix Az Area
Posts: 31
|
Re: Rearend question
Quote:
I ended up finding an 8.8 out of a T-bird turbo coupe 3:73 limitted slip. It fit really nice and the pinion is centered. |
|
03-06-2008, 09:55 PM | #8 |
polishing a turd
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 674
|
Re: Rearend question
i only paid $200 for my 10-bolt disc conversion
yes the exploder is offset. the turbo coupe is centered, so is the mustang, and lincoln mark vii.
__________________
59 chevy apache 31 4x4 - my project: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8668512 53 buick special - straight 8 sled - blow through turbo 47 gmc - flatbed hot rod build 99 ford econoline e350 - 4x4 converted family roadtrip/overlanding rig AKA 'Monstervan' AKA 'Daddy-Van' Last edited by 1-ton of fun; 03-06-2008 at 09:56 PM. |
03-06-2008, 09:57 PM | #9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Rearend question
Well ive been doing some reading and not finding a whole lot on the 8.8's so far i have figgured out that not all exploders came with a off center pinons maybe just 4x4 or AWD? or maybe the other way around? any way i am going to be heading to the junk yard in a couple of weeks when i go on spring brake as they have alot of these rear ends laying around. i will measure the
2wd the 4x4 and the AWD and let you guys know what i find. Also about the offset center sections, i know hundreds of cars/trucks are made with offset center sections hell mopars came with there engines offset by somewhere around a inch? I think most cars pinon offset is done with up and down not side to side... as a completely straight pinon angle will cause vibration. So i guess the question is how much off set (side to side) is safe without causing vibration? |
03-06-2008, 10:18 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 7,862
|
Re: Rearend question
I work for an extended warranty company and we see alot of these rearends faililng. I dont think I would install one of these unless its already been rebuilt
__________________
1967custom |
03-06-2008, 10:43 PM | #11 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Rearend question
I have read that the f*rd ring and pinon gears suck, so i am thinking about replacing them with currie, or richmond, ect ect. but the rear ends are nice length with limited slip and discs, and can be found readily avaliable for $200 maybe less. The 10 bolt i have is about an inch narrower than i would like and has a 3.55 open with drums, not to mention alot smaller axles, i am not going crazy with power, somewhere right around 400hp so i do not need crazy upgrades just reliablity and the ability to handle my heavy foot.
|
03-06-2008, 10:43 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: mckinney, tx
Posts: 141
|
Re: Rearend question
if you look in the picture of the explorer rearend its too long ur wheel center is going to be all the way on the outside of the wheel and wont show any of the inner wheel hub like on the new cars of today I like mine sitting center or alittle farther back than center to show off the inside of the wheel. My advice get the wheels and tires u want with the amount of offset and get them up under the truck and get one cut to length either send that one in or buy a complete new one built to your needs.
|
03-06-2008, 10:50 PM | #13 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Rearend question
Which picture are you talking about? mcarrel's pic above is of a t-bird rear end i believe... i am pretty sure the explorer rear is 59 3/4" which is narrower than stock i think.
|
03-06-2008, 11:02 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: mckinney, tx
Posts: 141
|
Re: Rearend question
maybe just the pic angle really looks long. I believe the stock width is 58-60 so if its within that I say ok.
|
03-06-2008, 11:05 PM | #15 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Rearend question
I think that rear end looks really long too, maybe its a narrowed back half? or maybe the t-bird rears are longer? the 58" 10 bolt i have in looks like the tires will almost rub the frame.
|
03-06-2008, 11:12 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: mckinney, tx
Posts: 141
|
Re: Rearend question
get ur tires up under the fenders and then measure from hub end to hub end to see what the distance is. longer or short will tell ya how much offset to use if its not right or keep the tires and wheels and sent off to get cut to length.
|
03-07-2008, 02:22 AM | #17 |
polishing a turd
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 674
|
Re: Rearend question
the turbo coupe rears are pretty wide. i know they are wider than the mustangs (like 1.25" on each side wider) so a mustang rear may work. actually the turbo coupe and mustang rear housings are the same width, but the axles are longer. i have an 8.8 in my garage with fox mustang length axles. the sn95 mustang axles (94-98) are a total of 1.5" wider (.75" on each side) the later sn95 (99-04) are even wider (i forget how much)
just food for thought....
__________________
59 chevy apache 31 4x4 - my project: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8668512 53 buick special - straight 8 sled - blow through turbo 47 gmc - flatbed hot rod build 99 ford econoline e350 - 4x4 converted family roadtrip/overlanding rig AKA 'Monstervan' AKA 'Daddy-Van' |
03-07-2008, 02:46 AM | #18 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Rearend question
Ive thought about the mustang rears but they are harder to come by and more expensive, also they have 28 spline axels not 31 also are not wide enough (94-98) at 58" i think.
I just read that you can have 1" of offset for every 20" of driveshaft, any one ever heard this before? |
03-08-2008, 12:59 AM | #19 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Phoenix Az Area
Posts: 31
|
Re: Rearend question
Quote:
see more pics of my project here http://www.tagworld.com/azmark Last edited by mcarrel; 03-08-2008 at 01:12 AM. |
|
06-23-2009, 10:24 PM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Miami now in Vegas
Posts: 828
|
Re: Rearend question
Hey guys, I've been searching all day through junkyard after junkyard for the last 2 weeks for a 8.8 out of an explorer. For some reason all of the junkyards show me a rear end that measures 57- 1/2" after all my research I see that its suppose to be 59-3/4". All of the shorter rear ends seem to be in the price range of $175-$300. The only one that I found that measures 59-3/4" the guy wants $400 which I talked him down to from $500.
It has 3:73 gears, Disc brakes, sway bar, and it has 33,000 miles out of a 2001. So my question is, is $400 a good price? (remember- I live in South Florida and everything is expensive)
__________________
Long live SLIM ------------------ At least try to buy American |
06-24-2009, 01:39 AM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 425
|
Re: Rearend question
I dont know if it helps you or not but I just paid 150 for mine in northern California. Mine had more miles then yours but I dont know If I would pay 400.
|
06-24-2009, 07:59 AM | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Miami now in Vegas
Posts: 828
|
Re: Rearend question
Damn, I keep hearing about these $150-$200 deals. Then on other sites I hear people paying 500-600 dollars for them. Ive searched high and low and cant find the price on the low end
__________________
Long live SLIM ------------------ At least try to buy American |
06-24-2009, 03:33 PM | #23 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 54
|
Re: Rearend question
Quote:
__________________
55 1st Series 5 window, getting an s10 frame and 350 sbc Keeping it LOUD and ROUGH - just like BOONEMAN |
|
06-24-2009, 05:43 PM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 291
|
Re: Rearend question
Funny that after reading this thread I find this on CL. Not mine and don't know nothing about nothing regarding it.
http://raleigh.craigslist.org/pts/1237706340.html
__________________
'56 truck (the never ending project) '06 Z/71 loaded (daily driver) '07 Mercedes-Benz C-Class (wife's driver) Gone: 72 SB, 67 CST, 57 BBW, 47 Panel streetrod, |
06-24-2009, 06:57 PM | #25 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Miami now in Vegas
Posts: 828
|
Re: Rearend question
Now thats crazy. Of course even if its good, it has to be 900 miles away.
__________________
Long live SLIM ------------------ At least try to buy American |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|