The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-06-2011, 07:40 PM   #1
crispo-71
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: new braunfels tx
Posts: 57
bag bag!!! bag question

70 c10 short stepside im bagging, i made the lower cups on front for low control arm.. i made it 4 1/2 in. wide and 2 1/2 in. tall... i thiink the height is ok but im not sure about the with, is 4 1/2 ok or is it bigger.. i think im going with 2600 slam specialitys
crispo-71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2011, 07:48 PM   #2
Slick67
Sofa King Crazy!!
 
Slick67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,090
Re: bag bag!!! bag question

You may want to post this in the suspension area and let the gurus there help ya out. I think mine are almost 6.5 if I am not mistaken.
__________________
You found the Tater.

My Blazer Build (New) - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=654650

My 67 Build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=335650

67 Chevy LWB big window a/c AKA TOTALLED BY A JACKASS.
1972 2wd Blazer "Porterbuilt and Sloshed"
Slick67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2011, 08:05 PM   #3
mxjunkie80
Registered User
 
mxjunkie80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Gresham Oregon
Posts: 62
Re: bag bag!!! bag question

I'm making mine 8" around. Bigger better, no rub.
mxjunkie80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2011, 08:17 PM   #4
longbed67
Registered User
 
longbed67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Monroe, WI
Posts: 1,415
Re: bag bag!!! bag question

I just got in a few sets from thorbecke bros they measure 5-7/8 diameter and 2-1/4 tall and I usually trim them down to 1-1/4" tall unless you are looking to lift the front of your truck. I would definately make them larger in diameter to match the bottom of the plate on the air bag.

Not to rip on you mxjunkie80 but bigger isnt always better because as long as the height of the lower cup allows you to clear the bag on the control arm when completely deflated then you are just adding unecessary weight to the system.
longbed67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2011, 08:31 PM   #5
VA72C10
VA72C10
 
VA72C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Midlothian, VA
Posts: 25,267
Re: bag bag!!! bag question

are you speaking of the cups that fit in the stock control arm and the bag mounts to it or a cup welded into the bottom of the arm (circle cut out of the arm) that allows extra air pressure to be in the bag at the same drop because the bag is physically?
__________________
Looking for a 67-72 swb or blazer project in or around VA.
VA72C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2011, 12:24 AM   #6
mxjunkie80
Registered User
 
mxjunkie80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Gresham Oregon
Posts: 62
Re: bag bag!!! bag question

Quote:
Originally Posted by longbed67 View Post
I just got in a few sets from thorbecke bros they measure 5-7/8 diameter and 2-1/4 tall and I usually trim them down to 1-1/4" tall unless you are looking to lift the front of your truck. I would definately make them larger in diameter to match the bottom of the plate on the air bag.

Not to rip on you mxjunkie80 but bigger isnt always better because as long as the height of the lower cup allows you to clear the bag on the control arm when completely deflated then you are just adding unecessary weight to the system.
I don't take anything personal. I think we are talking about different things. I'm cutting out the bottom of my LCA and building 8" by 3" deep, recessed cups to mount the bag directly to so I can have the proper bag pressure at ride height and so they don't rub anything inflated, deflated or anywhere in between.
mxjunkie80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2011, 09:58 AM   #7
longbed67
Registered User
 
longbed67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Monroe, WI
Posts: 1,415
Re: bag bag!!! bag question

Yes we are talking different things! Will the 2600's fit inside an 8" cup though? I thought max diameter of the 2600's was 8"
longbed67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2011, 12:14 PM   #8
mxjunkie80
Registered User
 
mxjunkie80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Gresham Oregon
Posts: 62
Re: bag bag!!! bag question

Quote:
Originally Posted by longbed67 View Post
Yes we are talking different things! Will the 2600's fit inside an 8" cup though? I thought max diameter of the 2600's was 8"
If max diameter is 8" and you use a 8" diameter cup, it should fit fine. Of course inner diameter is slightly smaller. Actually I'm not even sure what size my front bags are. But I'd hope they fit with that big of a cup. If not, I'll make it work somehow.
mxjunkie80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2011, 12:40 PM   #9
crispo-71
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: new braunfels tx
Posts: 57
Re: bag bag!!! bag question

Quote:
Originally Posted by VA72C10 View Post
are you speaking of the cups that fit in the stock control arm and the bag mounts to it or a cup welded into the bottom of the arm (circle cut out of the arm) that allows extra air pressure to be in the bag at the same drop because the bag is physically?
yes im talking about the cup that sits in the control arm...
crispo-71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2011, 12:43 PM   #10
crispo-71
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: new braunfels tx
Posts: 57
Re: bag bag!!! bag question

Quote:
Originally Posted by longbed67 View Post
I just got in a few sets from thorbecke bros they measure 5-7/8 diameter and 2-1/4 tall and I usually trim them down to 1-1/4" tall unless you are looking to lift the front of your truck. I would definately make them larger in diameter to match the bottom of the plate on the air bag.

Not to rip on you mxjunkie80 but bigger isnt always better because as long as the height of the lower cup allows you to clear the bag on the control arm when completely deflated then you are just adding unecessary weight to the system.
ohh ok.. well i guess ill have to make dem bigger. im guessing the cup sits almost on the wall of the control arm, that makes sence now because the bottom of that control arm is not flat it has a low spot and causes cup to tilt . thanx alot guys
crispo-71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2011, 05:39 PM   #11
kev2809
low n' slo
 
kev2809's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: rosenberg, texas
Posts: 5,176
Re: bag bag!!! bag question

i believe my cups are 8" and by dominator 2600's came super close..too close for comfort that i swapped them to the 2500's just in case. but i think slam bags dont expand when deflated so you should be good. set the bag in the cup and see how much room you have. remember they inflate up at an angle, not straight up...just something to keep in mind as the suspension travels
__________________
67 1/2 ton Suburban - Project DRGNWGN. Build thread

-_--_--_ _________
_--_-_ -/____|__|__\__
,.,,,.,.,,.,|_O _______ O_]
kev2809 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2011, 07:34 PM   #12
project 67 sub
Account Suspended
 
project 67 sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: san bernardino ca. everywhere
Posts: 3,938
Re: bag bag!!! bag question

i made mine 9" diameter
project 67 sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2011, 06:26 AM   #13
MOTOIMPAIRED
Registered User
 
MOTOIMPAIRED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Orlando Florida
Posts: 315
Re: bag bag!!! bag question

Quote:
Originally Posted by project 67 sub View Post
i made mine 9" diameter
Same here..
MOTOIMPAIRED is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com