The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1947 - 1959 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-2012, 09:02 AM   #1
1959 Apache 3600
Registered User
 
1959 Apache 3600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Western Iowa
Posts: 147
1/2 ton frame -vs- 3/4 ton frame

Is there a frame difference between the 1/2 and 3/4 frames such as thickness and rigidity or is the difference just in the suspension?

I've got a 3/4 and am wondering if I need to box it while I have most of it apart.

Thanks!
1959 Apache 3600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 09:26 AM   #2
Larry Lindley
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 158
Re: 1/2 ton frame -vs- 3/4 ton frame

that is up to you, Ive ran them both ways,full box or part.
Larry Lindley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 09:32 AM   #3
Larry Lindley
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 158
Re: 1/2 ton frame -vs- 3/4 ton frame

what are you using the truck for?Drive train change?never had any problem with mine.someone will chime in .there are alot of good views on this forum.
Larry Lindley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 11:26 AM   #4
mknittle
Registered User
 
mknittle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
Re: 1/2 ton frame -vs- 3/4 ton frame

I would box it now these frames are pretty flexy .
__________________
Mark

My GMC build.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=536602

Last edited by mknittle; 01-12-2012 at 11:32 AM.
mknittle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 01:57 PM   #5
OrrieG
Registered User
 
OrrieG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 8,800
Re: 1/2 ton frame -vs- 3/4 ton frame

The literature link in my signatue has a page that shows all the frame specs.

The frames were designed to be flexible and straighten out because back then they were used to cross fields, ditches, streams, and go off road. I have had mine with the axles at opposite extremes with the cab and bed twisted. I once popped the weld were the A pillar meets the cab and thought for sure I was going to blow out the windshield.

If you are upgrading the suspension and plan on just driving it on the street and highway then boxing is an option to strengthen the connection points. I have not boxed any of my frame, or welded on any of the suspension, engine, etc. mounts and have not had any problems.
__________________
1959 Chevy Short Fleetside w/ 74 4WD drive train (current project) OrrieG Build Thread
1964 Chevelle Malibu w/ 355-350TH (daily driver)
Helpful AD and TF Manual Site Old Car Manual Project
OrrieG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 03:30 PM   #6
_Ogre
Registered User
 
_Ogre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Motown
Posts: 7,680
Re: 1/2 ton frame -vs- 3/4 ton frame

not sure what the difference is, but i know they are different.
you can't get a mustII for a 3/4 or 1 ton frame.
a factory assembly manual will tell you everything you need to know
they are also handy for reassembling your truck, a worthy $29 purchase

it will flex, i like the look of a boxed frame.
i also welded all 3000+ holes in my frame (slight exaggeration, maybe)

__________________
cool, an ogre smiley Ogre's 58 Truk build

how to put your truck year and build thread into your signature
shop air compressor timer
_Ogre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 05:18 PM   #7
1959 Apache 3600
Registered User
 
1959 Apache 3600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Western Iowa
Posts: 147
Re: 1/2 ton frame -vs- 3/4 ton frame

Great! Thanks for the replies.
I'm moving up to a big block C454 and TH400. I also plan on flatbedding and putting dualies on the rear end.
1959 Apache 3600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 06:52 PM   #8
MrTucker
Registered User
 
MrTucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 455
Re: 1/2 ton frame -vs- 3/4 ton frame

the only difference is the length. I dont think any 3/4 tons were made in short beds.
__________________
1953 GMC 1/2 ton long bed
Original 228 I6 with a Hydramatic Auto Tranny
Project Pack Rat - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=3374649
MrTucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 07:10 PM   #9
Larry Lindley
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 158
Re: 1/2 ton frame -vs- 3/4 ton frame

with the drive train up grade I would box frame.
Larry Lindley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 08:21 PM   #10
mknittle
Registered User
 
mknittle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
Re: 1/2 ton frame -vs- 3/4 ton frame

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrrieG View Post
The literature link in my signatue has a page that shows all the frame specs.

The frames were designed to be flexible and straighten out because back then they were used to cross fields, ditches, streams, and go off road. I have had mine with the axles at opposite extremes with the cab and bed twisted. I once popped the weld were the A pillar meets the cab and thought for sure I was going to blow out the windshield.

If you are upgrading the suspension and plan on just driving it on the street and highway then boxing is an option to strengthen the connection points. I have not boxed any of my frame, or welded on any of the suspension, engine, etc. mounts and have not had any problems.
I agree for off road I would not box it my 42 willys jeep is not boxed and flexes better than the boxed ones.
__________________
Mark

My GMC build.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=536602
mknittle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 09:20 PM   #11
OrrieG
Registered User
 
OrrieG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 8,800
Re: 1/2 ton frame -vs- 3/4 ton frame

Quote:
Originally Posted by mknittle View Post
I agree for off road I would not box it my 42 willys jeep is not boxed and flexes better than the boxed ones.
Those were the other rigs I learned to drive and wrench on. Our favorite was a M38A1 with PTO winch. They were the ones used for Communications and came with 24 volt electrical system, sealed so you could literally run water up to the bottom of the windshield. Worked really good in Western Oregon, were its wet all the time. Thing would climb a tree in low range. Back then you could get them at govt auctions for a couple hundred dollars, slap a paint job, chrome rims and a roll bar on them and sell for $600.
__________________
1959 Chevy Short Fleetside w/ 74 4WD drive train (current project) OrrieG Build Thread
1964 Chevelle Malibu w/ 355-350TH (daily driver)
Helpful AD and TF Manual Site Old Car Manual Project
OrrieG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com