Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-21-2013, 12:03 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: kennewick, WA
Posts: 1,513
|
6 lug disc conversion, wheel backspacing
I've converted my 65 1/2 ton using baer brakes kit, lowered 2.5" in the front using mcgaughy's drop spindle and 5'' (I think) in the rear with a spring. I threw a set of wheels off of a newer chevy avalanche and it looks like the wheels in the front stick out about 2'' past the back wheels. I've searched and found some rotors that offered different spacing, but that's not an option for me.
Is this is a common issue when lowering these trucks or is it the wheels? as far I know the wheels on the truck are the same back spacing now.
__________________
1965 c/10 swb 1969 c/10 lwb |
03-21-2013, 12:49 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California Delta
Posts: 2,163
|
Re: 6 lug disc conversion, wheel backspacing
Most dropped spindles move your front wheels out 3/4" per side. I don't know if the bigger brakes effect the offset.
__________________
Name: Rich Current Ride: 1964 C-10 Short Fleetside Daily Driver: 2005 GMC crew cab short fleetside /2001 Chevy Tahoe Past GM Trucks: 1959 GMC short stepside 1968 GMC short stepside-4x4 1973 Chevy short stepside 1989 Chevy short fleetside-reg cab 1993 Chevy short fleetside-Xcab 2002 Chevy short fleetside-Xcab Save the dinosaurs, use synthetic oil. |
03-21-2013, 12:49 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Los Banos, CA
Posts: 390
|
Re: 6 lug disc conversion, wheel backspacing
yes it is. I just used McGaughneys 2 1/2 " drop spindals, stock front springs with 3 " rear coils . I run 15 x 7 front slotted mags and 15 x 81/2 rear slots and they balance out to look even from the side. The rotors in the front tend to push out the front wheels a bit, they claim only 1/4 inch or so, but to me it looks like a bit more...
|
03-21-2013, 01:07 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 65
|
Re: 6 lug disc conversion, wheel backspacing
Subscribed
Posted via Mobile Device |
03-21-2013, 10:33 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: kennewick, WA
Posts: 1,513
|
Re: 6 lug disc conversion, wheel backspacing
So, to fix my problem... Can I get away without using wheel spacers and get wheels with a different offset or what?
__________________
1965 c/10 swb 1969 c/10 lwb |
03-21-2013, 11:27 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Galt, Calif
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: 6 lug disc conversion, wheel backspacing
The front to rear track width is differant, the rear axle on the 65, is in fact almost two inches narrower that the front, in 1971 GM changed the rear axle track width by 1.5 inches, so if this really bothers you, you have two choises, buy wider rims for the rear or differant back spacing or change out the rear axle to a `71 or newer..
__________________
`64 C10 vortec 350/350/373 posi `69 RS/SS 350/350/308 `37 Ford 406/350/324 traclock `68 Dart 370/904/323 suregrip |
03-22-2013, 12:07 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: kennewick, WA
Posts: 1,513
|
Re: 6 lug disc conversion, wheel backspacing
I totally forgot about the front being wider.... that explains it. hanks for the info, ill see if ican get some different wheels
__________________
1965 c/10 swb 1969 c/10 lwb |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|