Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-30-2017, 06:56 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Redwood city, CA
Posts: 694
|
Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
Is anyone running stock height suspension with 32" tires OR has a 1" block lift at the rear only with 32" tires. Any pictures that you could post?
I'm wondering : a) What the stance looks like - I think the 1" lift would eliminate the rear squat that the blazer has and the slightly larger tires woudl make it look a wee bit more solid. b) Whether I'd need to trim the fenders at all (don't want to do that). |
01-30-2017, 08:09 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Antonio,Texas
Posts: 220
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
I ran 33's on stock suspension on my suburban. when it had 8" rallys it cleared once I put the 12" rims I had to clearance the rear of the front fender.
__________________
Life is to short to drive anything else |
01-30-2017, 08:40 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Redwood city, CA
Posts: 694
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
Pretty certain I have 8 inch x 15 so that should be good . Some photos wouldn't go amiss though folks
|
01-31-2017, 10:38 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Colo Springs, CO
Posts: 870
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
I did 32 x 11.5 BFG's and they were just fine at stock height. Adding a 1" block in the rear also worked perfect for me to take the sagging look out.
You should be just fine.
__________________
- Jeff 89' K5 Blazer, 2.5" lift, 35" tires 04' GMC Yukon XL, 3/4 ton, 8.1L |
01-31-2017, 01:25 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 335
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
I ran 32x11.50-15 Cooper STT's on stock 8x15 ralley's with my 1980 Suburban for nearly three years on the high-mileage stock suspension with no trouble at all (see picture). The fronts did occasionally rub the running boards in certain situations, but it was pretty mild.
__________________
1980 K10 Suburban Silverado, original 350 w/Qjet swapped to 406sb, TH350C swapped to TH400/205 |
01-31-2017, 04:04 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Redwood city, CA
Posts: 694
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
Ski - me - any pics??
Silver Miner - how gnarly were the "certain situations"? this is going to be a mall crawler with occasional beach / rocky trail and mud 4x4 use. |
01-31-2017, 04:15 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 335
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
It only occurred in crossed up situations, such as when trying to climb diagonally out of very deep ruts in a logging road and the steering turned to full lock. The running boards are the problem, and without them intruding into the fender area I doubt I'd have ever had a tire touch the original fenders. I too have run 33's on a stock suspension (but not this suburban) with the exact same results - a little bit of rubbing in crossed-up situations that could easily be addressed with modest fender trimming or narrower tires such as a 255-85-16. Some rigs can run 33's with no drama, and others can't. I've become convinced over time that the primary difference is due more to worn out and collapsed body mounts than worn out springs.
__________________
1980 K10 Suburban Silverado, original 350 w/Qjet swapped to 406sb, TH350C swapped to TH400/205 |
01-31-2017, 04:35 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 335
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
Here is a photo of my old 78 Jimmy running 255-85-16's (approx. 33") on stock suspension, complete with droopy butt.
__________________
1980 K10 Suburban Silverado, original 350 w/Qjet swapped to 406sb, TH350C swapped to TH400/205 |
02-01-2017, 07:28 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Redwood city, CA
Posts: 694
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
Thanks all for the info, but keep pictures coming if anyone has them. Sounds like I should be able to fit large tires with minimal issue to existing wheels when the current ones get a bit more worn down. I'll add 1 inch lift blocks at the same time and we'll see how it turns out.
|
02-01-2017, 09:57 PM | #10 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Oregon
Posts: 32
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
Quote:
http://offroaddesign.com/catalog/Zero%20Rates.htm
__________________
1974 Chevrolet K5 Blazer 350/Th400/205 Dana 60/14 Bolt 36x12-16 S.S TSL Radials 6"Front 7.5"Rear F/R ORD bushings/front shackles Sky shackle flip, Crossover, rear disc brake conversion ORD steering box brace, Tom woods CV rear driveshaft |
|
02-03-2017, 01:51 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Colo Springs, CO
Posts: 870
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
It was 15 years ago if I can recall.....so hard to find pics with 32's on it.
Here is my old suburban that I put 1" blocks on the rears....couldn't tell you the tire size but I think they were 16" rims?!?
__________________
- Jeff 89' K5 Blazer, 2.5" lift, 35" tires 04' GMC Yukon XL, 3/4 ton, 8.1L |
02-03-2017, 02:07 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Colo Springs, CO
Posts: 870
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
I did a bit more looking....this guy claims to have 32" tires.
Also, you and I discussed this awhile back in another thread. Here are a few more pics that might help you. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=605354
__________________
- Jeff 89' K5 Blazer, 2.5" lift, 35" tires 04' GMC Yukon XL, 3/4 ton, 8.1L |
02-03-2017, 02:10 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Colo Springs, CO
Posts: 870
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
another 32 with no lift
__________________
- Jeff 89' K5 Blazer, 2.5" lift, 35" tires 04' GMC Yukon XL, 3/4 ton, 8.1L |
02-03-2017, 02:25 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Redwood city, CA
Posts: 694
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
You have a good memory - I'd totally forgotten that thread.
That last one looks about perfect in terms of stance. |
02-03-2017, 08:58 PM | #15 |
I know the pieces fit
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MONTGOMERY, AL
Posts: 5,523
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
32's look great on a stock suspension but they're hard to find. At least they used to be.
|
02-05-2017, 08:21 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: salt lake city, utah
Posts: 208
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
__________________
'80 SRW C35 - 355/700R4/4:11/2.5-3/DD '77 Cheyenne K5 - Roller cam 355/NV4500/205/4:88's/35's/DD rust repair on the '77 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=740291 |
11-02-2018, 10:53 PM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 90045 cali
Posts: 568
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
Thread revival....anyone else with stock suspension and 32’s please post pics.
|
05-28-2022, 04:22 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: cali
Posts: 13
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
i just got 31s maybe i should have gotten 32s (i still have stock suspension)
|
06-06-2022, 02:02 PM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Knoxville AL
Posts: 74
|
Re: Pictures of stock height with 32" tires?
My 1989 Suburban v1500 had 235/75/15 tires when I got it -stock size. There was so much space inside the wheel well you could stick your head in above the tire and rotate without hitting anything. I moved up to 31" tires for a free 1 +" lift, have had no problems at all.
__________________
1989 Suburban 1500 4 x 4 1989 BMW 325i 1945 Willys MB Jeep 1959 Triumph TR3A |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|