The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2009, 04:57 PM   #1
aboz
Registered User
 
aboz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: indian trail, nc
Posts: 192
Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

can someone tell me of a modern chassis that would pretty much be ready to roll under a 60-66 series shortbed? I've heard the mid to late 80's Blazers were a perfect fit but these are getting harder to find. Also, it may be blasphemy but has anyone ever fit a more fuel efficient Honda or Toyota engine and drive train in a mid 60's Chevy truck? maybe a better fit would be a modern four cylinder Chevy engine? I'm going for fuel efficiency here not horsepower! Anyone experienced in these matters?
aboz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 05:04 PM   #2
Joey~AP
TexasBowhunter
 
Joey~AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: alvin, texas
Posts: 450
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

Ive mated a 66 truck to a 77 Blazer chassis, but it werent easy.

Look in my sig.


Rice burner in a 60-66?

Prepare to be stoned!

Last edited by Joey~AP; 03-03-2009 at 05:09 PM.
Joey~AP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 05:57 PM   #3
Rogue
Airport Bum
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Propwash (16Xray) D/FW, Texas
Posts: 320
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

Maybe you need this.....
http://www.innovationretrokits.com/
__________________
1964 Chevrolet C-10
1941 Chevrolet coupe
1962 Thunderbird
1959 Edsel Villager
1963 Skylark
Rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 05:58 PM   #4
MacAttack
283 Drama Queen
 
MacAttack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Surf City, CA
Posts: 2,435
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

Quote:
Originally Posted by aboz View Post
Also, it may be blasphemy but has anyone ever fit a more fuel efficient Honda or Toyota engine and drive train in a mid 60's Chevy truck? maybe a better fit would be a modern four cylinder Chevy engine?


"Get your people back and heads down. This is gonna be a big one."

(Apocalypse Now)
__________________
For about 12 years of my adult life I had a severe speech impediment.
My ex-wife never let me get a word in edgewise.
MacAttack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 06:30 PM   #5
protrash64
Resistance is Futile
 
protrash64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mesa,Arizona
Posts: 3,520
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

This isnt NASCAR......
__________________
64 CHEVY PICK-UP > http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...otrash+re-hash
64 CARRYALL >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1964+suburban
66 LB >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=427852
STRENGTH/DETERMINATION/MERCILESS/FOREVER
.......posted via stationary device
protrash64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 06:35 PM   #6
jchav62
1962 C-10
 
jchav62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Las Vegas, New Mexico
Posts: 4,978
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

There's really not much difference between a 63-72 to chassis compared to what you call "modern". The biggest difference in the earlier years is brakes and power steering. You can easily adapt power disc brakes and power steering to the original chassis. Our truck have independent front coil spring suspension, which many newer ones still have, plus we have trailing arms and coils in the rear. Many people convert leaf spring suspensions to a trailing arm or a 3 or 4 link suspension. Our trucks already have a pretty dam good setup. If I were you, I'd convert your original chassis to power disc brakes/power steering...rather than doing a complete swap.

As for the Yamaguchi power plant...I'll have nothing to do with that! You got a lot of huevos asking about that over here...Don't you want your truck to have huevos too???
__________________
Joseph Chavez
"See the USA in a Chevrolet!!"
......................_____
.........________//__{\_____
,,,,,,,/__(O)___//___/__(O)_/

1962 C10 Shortbed Fleetside 327/th350 GV overdrive
1974 C10 Longbed Fleetside 350/th350 "The Trash Truck"
1999 Chevy 2500 OBS, Longbed 5.7/4L80E 4x4
2015 GMC Sierra SLE 1500 4x4
jchav62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 07:02 PM   #7
MacAttack
283 Drama Queen
 
MacAttack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Surf City, CA
Posts: 2,435
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

The point of these restorations - most of them anyway, isn’t fuel economy.

If I didn’t have the original 2-barrel carburator intake for my ‘283’ or it wasn’t in good shape - I’d have just gone with a small, modern four-barrel. Mine’s going to be a 25 mile per day (round trip) daily driver and at about 200 horsepower (at best) I didn’t want to go any more "pansy" than it is.

Not saying a good 230 straight six with a 1-barrel isn’t as economical as you can get (because that’s what was in my C10 before it got ripped off), but honestly - pushing that kind of weight, the poor ol’ girl wasn’t exactly greased lightning coming off a green light at an intersection.

Truth is - if I keep my foot out of it, the ‘283’ V-8 might get just about the same MPG as the ‘230’ Straight-6. We’ll see - once the new motor’s broken in.

The main point in all of this is that an electric motor could probably be adapted to drive my truck, but personally - I like being an old school throw back. Well, that and my pick-up has the aerodynamics of a Kenmore.

Mac.
__________________
For about 12 years of my adult life I had a severe speech impediment.
My ex-wife never let me get a word in edgewise.
MacAttack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 07:10 PM   #8
jchav62
1962 C-10
 
jchav62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Las Vegas, New Mexico
Posts: 4,978
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

Another powerplant to consider is a TBI 4.3 v6 or even a TBI 350. These will give a little better fuel economy and there still American...heck they're still CHEVY.
__________________
Joseph Chavez
"See the USA in a Chevrolet!!"
......................_____
.........________//__{\_____
,,,,,,,/__(O)___//___/__(O)_/

1962 C10 Shortbed Fleetside 327/th350 GV overdrive
1974 C10 Longbed Fleetside 350/th350 "The Trash Truck"
1999 Chevy 2500 OBS, Longbed 5.7/4L80E 4x4
2015 GMC Sierra SLE 1500 4x4
jchav62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 07:47 PM   #9
joe231
Registered User
 
joe231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 13,821
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed



sorry, couldn't help myself..................
__________________
CHEVY ONLY
joe231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 09:44 PM   #10
TimE
Hey Y'all!!
 
TimE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Minette, Alabama
Posts: 1,755
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

What you need to consider is these trucks need torque to get them moving.

In all actuality, a decent 350 can get better gas mileage than a smaller motor dependant on your setup. I once replaced a burnt up 305 with a stock 350 in an old Camaro that I had and picked up about 4 miles per gallon as a result.
__________________
Just hopin' I live long enough to finish something!!!
TimE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 10:02 PM   #11
Hipper
Registered User
 
Hipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 148
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

smaller does not meen beter milage. I once had a 79 suburban with a 454 that got 14 mpg and couldnt sell it everyone wanted a 350 so I fanally swapped in a 350 and it got 12 mpg after that but 2 weeks later I sold it. You have to have enough motor to pull the weight and lack of aero. Just my 2 cents stick with a well tuned engine and add p/s and disc brakes if you want.
__________________

71 GMC Long Bed, 454,factory everything, lowered, and shaved.
64 GMC Short Bed (great grandfathers truck)
65 Chevy 1 ton Dually a/c p/s p/b v8 auto
89 Jeep Cherokee 3" lift
79 MG Midget (My 7 year old vehicle)
29 Ford Model A Rat Rod (in the works)
86 pontiac fiero 2.5 manual18 year olds)
87 pontiac fiero SE 2.8 auto (18 year olds)
90 Mitsubishi eclipes turbo AWD (18 year olds)
69 BMW 1600 (wifes toy)
Hipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 10:23 PM   #12
jason65
Registerd User
 
jason65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,118
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

A Honda or Toyota motor in our style of trucks = a flaming bag of crap on your door step.
jason65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 01:52 AM   #13
Captainfab
60-66 Nut

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,252
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

Keep the original frame, swap in power discs, power steering, and add a modern GM power train such as a 5.3 with a 4L60E. This would be a nice to drive truck with classic styling and get decent mileage.....as good as you're going to get with a 2 ton brick.

Honda or Toyota engine.....


__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE
Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE
Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE
Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE
Captainfab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 01:10 PM   #14
kizer
Its Deja Vu time again
 
kizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marysville, North of Seattle WA
Posts: 815
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

I know its off topic a bit, but Just like My Jeep TJ. It has a 4.0, but the popular swap is the modern Hemi which gives it tons of extra power, but oddly enough the motor weighs aboug the same or just a hair lighter. The motor barely has to work to move the body and gives you "tons" of power and great gas milage. Sounds like a beast too. To bad I can't afford it, but anyways.

I have a Factory 66 car motor in my 65, but I also have a 89 Rebuilt 350 sitting on a stand that I havent decided if I'm going to commit to as of yet. I'd almost bet the 350 weighs pretty close to the 250 with all the added benifits of the extra two cylinders. Give it a good tune up and required top end and you'd have a decent motor.

With these trucks just like other hobbies vehicles its not about the gas milage anymore. Realiability, power and well good looks is what I think of half the time. Of course they might not all fall into the same package all the time, but sometimes you have to pick one of the three and tweak until you do.
__________________
Its not pretty but its mine to figure out.
The build / The Photos / Build Diary

Last edited by kizer; 03-04-2009 at 01:14 PM.
kizer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 01:48 PM   #15
MacAttack
283 Drama Queen
 
MacAttack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Surf City, CA
Posts: 2,435
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

Quote:
Originally Posted by kizer View Post
Reliability, power and well good looks is what I think of half the time. Of course they might not all fall into the same package all the time, but sometimes you have to pick one of the three and tweak until you do.
True dat!

Also - in these economic times, it's nice to know that you can open the hood and be able to work on (or screw up - in my case) your own stuff, versus the case of a new Caddy, where you open the hood to view a 6-foot wide plastic cover contraption.

At least if I mess my stuff up I can always get you guys (and the NAPA store) to help me get it running again - as long as I go to Wal-Mart and get those darn pics.

Mac.
__________________
For about 12 years of my adult life I had a severe speech impediment.
My ex-wife never let me get a word in edgewise.
MacAttack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 05:23 PM   #16
kizer
Its Deja Vu time again
 
kizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marysville, North of Seattle WA
Posts: 815
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

Ah come on man. Don't be a hater.



I don't even know what I'm looking at either.

Even better
http://z.about.com/d/cars/1/0/J/9/1/ag_08sts_engine.jpg
__________________
Its not pretty but its mine to figure out.
The build / The Photos / Build Diary

Last edited by kizer; 03-04-2009 at 05:25 PM.
kizer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 05:30 PM   #17
MacAttack
283 Drama Queen
 
MacAttack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Surf City, CA
Posts: 2,435
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

Quote:
Originally Posted by kizer View Post
Ah come on man. Don't be a hater.

__________________
For about 12 years of my adult life I had a severe speech impediment.
My ex-wife never let me get a word in edgewise.
MacAttack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 07:42 PM   #18
63Belair
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seattle Washington
Posts: 22
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

I didn't see if you were attempting to go with a 4-wheel drive frame for the conversion you have in mind. I think the easy solution for a 2-wheel drive is to just swap out the front end with a 77-80 2-wheel dr. 1/2 ton and use the later rearend also. If your looking for 4-wheel, the Blazer swap would be the way to go.

Last edited by 63Belair; 03-04-2009 at 07:46 PM.
63Belair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 10:19 PM   #19
aboz
Registered User
 
aboz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: indian trail, nc
Posts: 192
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

Wow!...seems I touched a nerve! OK so the chasis swap is a pipe dream...I don't have the bucks to do it anyway. It's pretty solid as is. Don't go gettin' all riled up you asphalt chewin' horsepower junkies because I love the look of my straight six all decked out in Chevy Orange like it is. There just has to be a way of getting 24-30 mpg. out of her. I'm not planning to install power steering but I did buy a power brake booster and a dual master cylinder. Install set for this month. I am however keeping the drum/drum set up. They too will soon be painted Chevy Orange. I bought a beautiful set of five lug Corvette Rally rims w/ raised white letter BF Goodrich T/A's. If that ain't All-American red neck for you, I don't know what is! Pix will be posted next week.
aboz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 10:29 PM   #20
ChiefRocka
Hollister, CA.
 
ChiefRocka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hollister, Ca.
Posts: 6,150
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey~AP View Post
Ive mated a 66 truck to a 77 Blazer chassis, but it werent easy.

Look in my sig.


Rice burner in a 60-66?

Prepare to be stoned!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogue View Post
Maybe you need this.....
http://www.innovationretrokits.com/
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacAttack View Post

"Get your people back and heads down. This is gonna be a big one."

(Apocalypse Now)
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe231 View Post


sorry, couldn't help myself..................
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason65 View Post
A Honda or Toyota motor in our style of trucks = a flaming bag of crap on your door step.





Seriously......as mentioned, you can make it more economical...just keep it GM !!
__________________
John

What the Heck is that ??

CURRENT BUILDS:
62 BurbMaster

Other Builds:
My '63 C-10,LWB,CC,BBW
'06 HD StrAight Axle Swap

Father/Son '67 C-20, LQ9,4L80,Bagged,8-Lugger !!Good Friend Richard's Build

AMERICAN CUSTOMS & CLASSICS (831) 630-1965
www.ACCHOLLISTER.com
ACC on FACEBOOK
"Rest in Peace, Mom & Dad ... I will see you again someday!"
ChiefRocka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 10:51 PM   #21
TR65
Senior Member
 
TR65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 873
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

Hey aboz,

I drive back and forth to work with a 6.2 litre 435 horse LS3 chevy motor and the average mpg today was 23.6. I am putting a 6 litre in my truck and expect to get over 20+ mpg. So you need to do three things.

1. Get a modern chevy LS motor, as someone mentioned 5.3L or bigger the better. They can be had cheaply, there are so many of them.
2. You have to slow the motor down. That requires an over-drive transmission like a T56 manual. You need the engine to run about 1300 rpm in high gear at 70 mph. (Our stock truck gearing is not suited to today's highway driving). With the high torque you can put put around in high gear at 45 mph.
3. Keep your foot out of it. (Actually I put my foot in it once per day, minimal hit on mileage)

Good luck with your truck!

TR
__________________
1965 C10 SWB Fleet
Two owner

LS2 Swap Thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=413880
TR65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 12:56 AM   #22
19GMC63
Registered User
 
19GMC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,510
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

Quote:
Originally Posted by jason65 View Post
A Honda or Toyota motor in our style of trucks = a flaming bag of crap on your door step.
19GMC63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 05:52 AM   #23
1Bad62Pro/Street
"Where were you in '62?"
 
1Bad62Pro/Street's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cleveland County, North Cackalacky
Posts: 5,013
Thumbs up Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

Quote:
Originally Posted by aboz View Post
Wow!...seems I touched a nerve! OK so the chasis swap is a pipe dream...I don't have the bucks to do it anyway. It's pretty solid as is. Don't go gettin' all riled up you asphalt chewin' horsepower junkies because I love the look of my straight six all decked out in Chevy Orange like it is. There just has to be a way of getting 24-30 mpg. out of her. I'm not planning to install power steering but I did buy a power brake booster and a dual master cylinder. Install set for this month. I am however keeping the drum/drum set up. They too will soon be painted Chevy Orange. I bought a beautiful set of five lug Corvette Rally rims w/ raised white letter BF Goodrich T/A's. If that ain't All-American red neck for you, I don't know what is! Pix will be posted next week.
Your new bud.....part of the hazing process. Ha Ha......

You got to be broke in.
Sounds like you just want a cruiser. What's your trannie hooked on that inline 6? Maybe you need a Powerglide Trans!


__________________
PROJECT: "FULL METAL YELLOW JACKET"
1962 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed Nostalgia Pro/Street Pickup Truck
PROJECT: "FULL METAL YELLOW JACKET Build Thread
What Are You Workin' On? - 1Bad62ChevyPickup
PROJECT: "TYRANNORAMBLER REX"
1969 AMC Rambler American Nostalgia Pro/Street
Youtube Channel: Father Son Projects
Youtube Channel: 2TIMOTHY2FITHTEEN

"North and South Carolina Folks Click Here!"
(((( ~ I have Parts For Sale & Miscellaneous Stuff ~ ))))

"Well being as there's no other place around the place,
I reckon this must be the place, I reckon...Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk" -Curly Howard Ph.D.

Last edited by 1Bad62Pro/Street; 03-05-2009 at 06:26 AM.
1Bad62Pro/Street is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 11:35 PM   #24
19GMC63
Registered User
 
19GMC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,510
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

why a powerglide?
A 700r4 or a T5 or any other OD tranny would be the ticket for him.
19GMC63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 02:03 AM   #25
Captainfab
60-66 Nut

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,252
Re: Modern chassis and engine for 63 shortbed

Quote:
Originally Posted by 19GMC63 View Post
why a powerglide?
A 700r4 or a T5 or any other OD tranny would be the ticket for him.

X2.....an OD trans and maybe a little bump up in the rear gear should help the mpg's. Also you might look at upgrading the ignition system to a HEI. that alone should get you 1+ mpg....I have experienced that on a small block.
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE
Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE
Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE
Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE
Captainfab is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com