The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1947 - 1959 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-10-2019, 12:26 PM   #1
Coach529
Registered User
 
Coach529's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Post Falls, Idaho
Posts: 1,757
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr48chev View Post

I should note that we lost DWCSR in late 2017 early 2018 when he passed away.
I did not realize that. Thanks for sharing!!

RIP
__________________
1949 Chevy 3600

"Adventures of Henry"

http://smu.gs/QOlhWY
Coach529 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2019, 07:34 AM   #2
1953
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Mount plesant michigan
Posts: 73
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

Yeah just wondering i got a speedway motors and its saying 18 1/8 from the front shackle holes so i been seeing what other people has been doing 18 1/2 isnt much of a diffrence
1953 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2019, 12:55 AM   #3
mr48chev
Registered User
 
mr48chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,819
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1953 View Post
Yeah just wondering i got a speedway motors and its saying 18 1/8 from the front shackle holes so i been seeing what other people has been doing 18 1/2 isnt much of a diffrence
It is 18-1/8 an not 18-1/2 good catch. That's what happens when you write something and try to remember rather than check your facts first. My bad, I hope it didn't mess you up.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club.

My ongoing truck projects:
48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six.
71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant.
77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around.

Last edited by mr48chev; 10-11-2019 at 01:03 AM.
mr48chev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2019, 03:30 PM   #4
1953
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Mount plesant michigan
Posts: 73
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

I went with 18 1/8 like it said if you was reffering to me.
1953 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2019, 09:22 PM   #5
51 3600
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Orange Park, FL
Posts: 191
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

Don't mean to hijack this thread but it seems the right place to get some help using a Danforth crossmember. I'm using the front suspension from a 2WD '01 Blazer changing to a tubular upper control arm. As you can see in the pics it ain't working to well. Obviously it's not the right arm yet it is supposed to be. All the less expensive arms I find don't seem to have the bend/drop that the stock arms have at the ball joint. Without spending $300-$500+, does anyone have a link to the tubular upper arms that work? Appreciate any help you might have. (2nd pic is with engine weight on frame.)

Name:  Chassis 026.jpg
Views: 1172
Size:  104.3 KB


Name:  Danforth member 051.jpg
Views: 1156
Size:  54.0 KB
51 3600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2019, 09:53 PM   #6
67Mal
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 16
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

https://www.s10forum.com/threads/tal...p-info.509340/
If this link works, it might help.
I think tall ball joints would help.
67Mal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2019, 10:14 PM   #7
dsraven
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: calgary alberta
Posts: 8,490
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

that looks like a recipe for disaster. the ball joint is working at extreme angle and may bottom and snap over a bump where suspension extremes happen. it is basically sitting at the lowest it can go without bottoming out, tearing the rubber boot or breaking the stud of the joint. the angle of the ball joint mount should be more neutral when in the middle of the suspension travel or basically at ride height with lower control arm level, from side to side view.
from a suspension geometry standpoint the upper control arm is going to move the upper ball joint outwards as the suspension goes upward. this is going to cause the wheel to lean out and may cause tire to fender interference. possibly check the upper control arm from a 4x4 blazer or one with a lift, they have a dog leg look to them.
dsraven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2019, 10:22 PM   #8
dsraven
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: calgary alberta
Posts: 8,490
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

if using the s10 suspension you may be able to get some drawings from the
gmupfitter
site. that would allow you to do some basic dimensions for upper to lower control arm pivot point and compare with your set up.
dsraven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2019, 11:34 PM   #9
51 3600
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Orange Park, FL
Posts: 191
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

Thanks for the info. A control arm with the dogleg look seems to me to be what’s needed but I haven’t found it in a tubular arm. Trying to keep from using the stock arm as then I have to notch the frame.
51 3600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2019, 12:33 PM   #10
dsraven
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: calgary alberta
Posts: 8,490
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

have you seen this site with the dog leg control arms?maybe help you.
the s10 is basically all G body stuff so you could also try the G body forums for advice.

https://www.globalwest.net/1982-02s1...lazer-2wd.html
dsraven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2019, 12:20 PM   #11
dsraven
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: calgary alberta
Posts: 8,490
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

you could peruse through here and see if there are some front end geometry drawings. it seems that, by the pics, your upper control arm is too far away from the lower control arm. possibly somebody on here or the hotrodder's or stovebolt forums could help with some dimensions. do you have a pic that shows it close up from the front view, the whole upper/lower control arm configuration assembled?
https://www.gmupfitter.com/files/med...LD_STTruck.pdf
dsraven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 02:37 PM   #12
mr48chev
Registered User
 
mr48chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,819
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

Looking at those arms in post 127 are they the ones designed for circle track cars or are they possibly intended to be used with drop spindles? They look like the 50 buck speedway ones. If you have their left side arm it is a half inch longer than stock to jack camber in the circle track car suspension.
https://www.speedwaymotors.com/GM-Me...haft,5584.html

I've seen some guys try to run the circle track A arms because they are so cheap (considered expendable by racers) with mixed results.
__________________
Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club.

My ongoing truck projects:
48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six.
71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant.
77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around.

Last edited by mr48chev; 01-15-2020 at 02:43 PM.
mr48chev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 02:58 PM   #13
dsraven
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: calgary alberta
Posts: 8,490
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

looking at post 127 I would say the geometry is outta whack. the down angle of the upper control arm will result in the tire leaning out at the top when the truck goes over a bump. should it not be more parallel to the lower control arm? the ball joint is bottomed out at that angle so if the suspension droops any more the stud could break. that would be interesting to drive.........
anybody else?
dsraven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 04:23 PM   #14
mr48chev
Registered User
 
mr48chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,819
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

That bare rolling chassis is minus about 1200 lbs pushing down on the front suspension. You can't tell how it is going to set until it does have it's curb weight on it.
I see that time and time again where guys fuss because something doesn't look right when they have no weight on the front end to get it down to actual ride height.
__________________
Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club.

My ongoing truck projects:
48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six.
71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant.
77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around.
mr48chev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 08:11 PM   #15
51 3600
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Orange Park, FL
Posts: 191
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

mr48chev your comment about racing application arms is making light bulbs go off above my head. I hadn't heard of racing style arms and the Speedway link you posted looks exactly like the arms I have. I checked another site Southside Performance Machine that has what looks to be the same arm and they list it as "designed for geometry correction" which I guess is another way of saying racing.

In other words that's why these arms aren't giving me the geometry I'm expecting, stock. BTW, the second pic in post 127 is with the engine and cab sitting on the frame. Add the front clip, hood, etc. there'll be more weight but I don't think it will help matters with those upper arms. Another possibility is that the springs are too strong for this old truck application.

May have to go back to stock arms like these to make it all work.
https://www.amazon.com/Detroit-Axle-.../dp/B07GZB3SB3

Thank you all for the edumacation.
51 3600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2020, 03:20 PM   #16
tx99gtp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 21
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

So more research on the danforth setup... I have the same tubular arms as seen on the 127 post. I finally got the motor in with some of the body so there is weight and suspension is still jacked up. Granted the wheels I have dont really fit due to backspacing, but the angles are terrible. Taller ball joints may help, plus the front sheet metal. Taller spindles will likely fix it but not about to pay the price. I am really considering selling all these gm metric bolt on parts and ripping out the danforth front in favor of something much better. I've been looking at Scott's (Scotts hotrods....not scott danforth) and really like the setup. I sure wish I knew all this about the danforth front before all this.



__________________
1947 Chevy 3100
1950 Chevy 3100 (sold)
2009 Chevy Silverado Texas Edition (sold)
2019 Chevy Silverado Texas Edition

Last edited by tx99gtp; 02-04-2020 at 03:37 PM. Reason: trying to add photos
tx99gtp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2020, 05:28 PM   #17
51 3600
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Orange Park, FL
Posts: 191
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

Have to say my sentiments are identical to yours. But I'm gonna stick with the Danforth a little while longer to see if the problem can be solved. Got another fella who's gonna look at it in a few weeks. Keep or scrap we'll see then. Learning curves are always steep.
51 3600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2020, 08:22 PM   #18
Kentyk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Devlin, Ontario
Posts: 10
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

I went through the same thing.

I used the same Speedway upper A arms and the geometry was out just like in the pictures above. I returned to the stock A arms with global west bushings and the front end sat perfectly.

I am now in the process of setting up the steering rack. I am using the 1995 Camaro rack as the Danforth kit came with the supplied weld in brackets for the install.

The Speedway upper arms do not work with the Danforth kit.

Kent
Kentyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2020, 04:13 PM   #19
docrock
Senior Member
 
docrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Encinitas, CA
Posts: 579
Re: Danforth Cross Member Install

Thanks for posting all this info on this setup. I think I am going to build my own for the next project.
__________________
1954 GMC on 93 Silverado chassis http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=408344

1942 Chevy 1/2 ton Pickup http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=429494

R.I.P. TOM SEFFRON 68 FOUR DOOR http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=495438

1942 Chevy that ate my brain 70 Chassis https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=835250
docrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com