The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2004, 06:13 PM   #1
Shev
Head Peon
 
Shev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Imlay City MI
Posts: 295
Yes the $675 is just for upper and lower arms...I called Jason again and got a price for the complete Coolride Kit (arms, bags, upper plates & shocks)

$875 for complete Coolride Kit!!!!!!!

Give him a call (812) 782-3581 and tell'em Shev sent ya...

Keep your eyes open for more deals deals to come...


Not sure if you guys have seen this here is the post on the AirRide Forum from Darren:

"The complete front kit with the bags and shocks is $999.
If you just want the 4 arms it will be $749.

Here are a couple added benefits to using these arms compared to the factory arms:
-First we corrected the ball joint angles on the upper and lower arms for a lowered vehicle.
-Then we added a couple degrees of Caster into the lower arm. This will improve road feel and aid steering wheel returnability. From the factory these trucks did not have much caster since some of them did not have power steering. In doing so the airspring is moved slightly forward, so you will either have to slot the mounting and air fitting holes on the upper plate or buy the revised one. They are $25 each.
- The strength and look of the arms is greatly improved as well."

And another post:
"When ordering keep in mind what year spindle you will be using. The ball joints will be different from 63-70, 71 & 72, and 73-87. I believe that most disc brake conversion kits use the 73-87 spindle. "
__________________
'72 Suburban, factory tilt, tach, front & rear AC, front & rear disc brakes, 383/700-R4

Last edited by Shev; 11-10-2004 at 06:25 PM.
Shev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2004, 03:42 PM   #2
cysko9
MI '69
 
cysko9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 314
thanks shev... just recieved my order from Suicide..
cudos to the guys there, they are pretty good to work with....
(when you can get through to them) i think they need a
secretarty..... sorry, office assistant to answer calls for them
__________________
1967 Chevy (Project Frankenstein)
1973 K5 Blazer
cysko9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2004, 12:15 AM   #3
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by cysko9
.... they are pretty good to work with....
(when you can get through to them) i think they need a
secretarty..... sorry, office assistant to answer calls for them
Would that be a lack of customer service?
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2004, 12:26 AM   #4
cysko9
MI '69
 
cysko9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 314
i guess you could say that...
once you do get through though they seem to be pretty good about helping you with whatever you need... maybe they are just understaffed
__________________
1967 Chevy (Project Frankenstein)
1973 K5 Blazer
cysko9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2004, 09:25 AM   #5
rolnlow
Registered User
 
rolnlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: independence mo usa
Posts: 333
I know this is a bad word but has anyone tried the arms from chassis tech for 569.00 upper and lower?
rolnlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2004, 10:18 AM   #6
XXL
Seņor Member
 
XXL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolnlow
I know this is a bad word but has anyone tried the arms from chassis tech for 569.00 upper and lower?
They are incompatible with bags so I didn't investigate further.
XXL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2004, 12:43 PM   #7
rolnlow
Registered User
 
rolnlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: independence mo usa
Posts: 333
yea they are. look
http://www.truckn-store.com/product....t.asp&ID=72985
rolnlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2004, 03:52 PM   #8
bagged72blaz
Got L.E.D.s
 
bagged72blaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Craig Co.
Posts: 195
I have SoLow lower a-arms and AirLift GenII Extreme bags up front. No brackets, I tack welded the supplied air bag plates to the lower arm, and upper crossmember. Aired out my front middle crossmember sits about 1 1/2" off the ground, with 255/55/17s on front. It handles very well.

My question is will I feel a noticable impovement in ride and handling with these ART arms? And how low will they go? Anyone have any pics of these installed? Do they provide more ground clearance under the arm, aired out? My lower arms hit the ground if I dump all the air, from full ride height, while moving.

Also SCOTI made a good point.

"The problem (for me) w/these arms is they actually correct alignment issues by making the upper arms longer, thus not requiring 'excessive' shims. That does me absolutely zilch good because w/longer arms my wheels/tires will be rubbing the outer edges of the fender-lip & wheel-well."

As I plan on going with 20X9 all the way around. And clearance will be a problem. Although I'm going to have to remove my iner fenders when I step up to 20s. What are all your thoughts on this?
bagged72blaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2005, 09:26 AM   #9
smokekiki
Mike
 
smokekiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: west chester pa
Posts: 2,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by bagged72blaz

Also SCOTI made a good point.

"The problem (for me) w/these arms is they actually correct alignment issues by making the upper arms longer, thus not requiring 'excessive' shims. That does me absolutely zilch good because w/longer arms my wheels/tires will be rubbing the outer edges of the fender-lip & wheel-well."

As I plan on going with 20X9 all the way around. And clearance will be a problem. Although I'm going to have to remove my iner fenders when I step up to 20s. What are all your thoughts on this?
You need to find out how much longer the upper arms are.If they are just long enough to get rid otf the shims,they should work.I have a 3/4" of shims.
__________________
70'c/10, 71 suburban4x4 402bb, 72suburban 4/6 drop, 72k/5 4x4 blazer 4" lift 35 tires
smokekiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2005, 09:52 AM   #10
XXL
Seņor Member
 
XXL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by smokekiki
You need to find out how much longer the upper arms are.If they are just long enough to get rid otf the shims,they should work.I have a 3/4" of shims.
A quick stab of the tape measure shows both stock and ART uppers to be 9" long from ball joint centerline to outer edge of the cross shaft. The difference in "length" appears to be in one of the spars, which has the effect of pushing the balljoint forward (thus reducing the KPI by a couple of degrees). So, with regard to wheel width/offset, I don't see any problems caused by the ART arms over the stockers.
XXL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2005, 10:14 AM   #11
smokekiki
Mike
 
smokekiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: west chester pa
Posts: 2,473
Thanks XXL,I didn't think they were increasing the track width.
__________________
70'c/10, 71 suburban4x4 402bb, 72suburban 4/6 drop, 72k/5 4x4 blazer 4" lift 35 tires
smokekiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2005, 12:28 PM   #12
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by smokekiki
Thanks XXL,I didn't think they were increasing the track width.
The ART's were supposed to retain factory width. It was the 'other' brand of arms that advertised the feature of "built in alignment correction w/o excess shims" which is a fancy way of saying they made the uppers longer.

For my application, I want everything tucked in as much as possible but not to the extreme of the MII width & certainly don't want it wider than stock. It would seem a good idea for the other brand to offer the lowers in a shortened version.
Quote:
MylilBowTie What about the shock mounting tabs? Or are they not used with bags?
They are located in the same position as factory arms. You don't see it in XXL's pics, but they are there.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2005, 12:24 AM   #13
MylilBowTie
Right turn Clyde
 
MylilBowTie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 2,911
What about the shock mounting tabs? Or are they not used with bags?
__________________
1974 C25 LWB: 454 4bbl Carb / TH400 / 3.73
1992 Camaro RS 305 TBI
MylilBowTie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2005, 09:40 AM   #14
XXL
Seņor Member
 
XXL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by MylilBowTie
What about the shock mounting tabs? Or are they not used with bags?
You will most definitely need shocks. The "spring rate" of the air bags is (depending on air pressure) generally much less than that of a coil spring. The shocks attach to the stock upper mount on the frame rail and to the mount on the rear of the lower control arm... which is part of the ART arm.
XXL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2005, 07:01 PM   #15
MylilBowTie
Right turn Clyde
 
MylilBowTie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 2,911
Thanks for the replys
__________________
1974 C25 LWB: 454 4bbl Carb / TH400 / 3.73
1992 Camaro RS 305 TBI
MylilBowTie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2005, 08:09 PM   #16
nate68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: ca
Posts: 1,110
does anyone know how much of a weight savings these are?
__________________
68 short step, 406/700r4, 9" w/discs.
nate68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2005, 08:36 PM   #17
XXL
Seņor Member
 
XXL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by nate68
does anyone know how much of a weight savings these are?
Insignificant at best.
XXL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2005, 05:32 PM   #18
smbrouss70
Registered User
 
smbrouss70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Rayne, LA
Posts: 2,781
What about the sway bar mounts? Will they accept the factory style sway bar with two bolts on either side or do you need an aftermarket type with the single bolt endlinks?
__________________
Steven

"If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go wherever they went." -- Will Rogers
R.I.P. Oscar

R.I.P. Ratchet

1967 Pontiac GTO - Dad was the Original Owner
1970 Chevy 2wd SWB "Oscar's Truck"
1970 Chevy 2wd Blazer "Ratchet's Blazer"
2013 Chevy 2500HD Crew Cab Duramax/Allison Z71 LTZ "Brown Sugar"
2017 Chevy Suburban "BDB"
2020 Chevy Blazer Premier "Foxy"

Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC)

Shop Build
smbrouss70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 12:34 AM   #19
72dually
Senior Member
 
72dually's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northern Arizona
Posts: 687
Just curious if the price has changed on the complete coolride w/arms as posted by shev from suicide doors?
I already purchased there plates and cups a couple month's ago, guess I wont be using the cups if I decide to go this route
Thanks
72dually is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 10:00 AM   #20
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by smbrouss70
What about the sway bar mounts? Will they accept the factory style sway bar with two bolts on either side or do you need an aftermarket type with the single bolt endlinks?
They require the use of aftermarket 'end-link' style sway-bars.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72dually
Just curious if the price has changed on the complete coolride w/arms as posted by shev from suicide doors?
I already purchased there plates and cups a couple month's ago, guess I wont be using the cups if I decide to go this route
Thanks
I don't know about the prices from SD's, but the plates will need to be notched @ the bag mounting holes as the AirRide arms move the bag slightly forward vs. a stock lower a-arm w/cups & bag.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 01:03 PM   #21
Shev
Head Peon
 
Shev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Imlay City MI
Posts: 295
The SD deal is still good...just tell Jason which board you saw it on. I would just order a set of Art plates when you order the arms (they are only like $25 for the set) and sell the kit you bought already. If you buy the complete coolride kit it comes with the correct plates...

Ooops...forgot one thing, you could always send back the SD kit you already have and get full credit for it...one of the great things about Jason, no restocking fees...
__________________
'72 Suburban, factory tilt, tach, front & rear AC, front & rear disc brakes, 383/700-R4

Last edited by Shev; 02-03-2005 at 06:20 PM.
Shev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 01:58 PM   #22
Captkaos
www.73-87chevytrucks.com
 
Captkaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,935
I just noticed this thread and just wanted to say cool pics. (I know I am late, but it bumped the post again.)
__________________
Chris Lucas
1973 Chevy C-10
1978 GMC Jimmy (2WD) - SOLD
1987 R10 twin turbo LS
1991 R3500 SRW CrewCab
1985 K5 diesel swapped project
1989 K5 2WD conversion w/ Vette susp Project
Captkaos Customs
73-87chevytrucks.com
Captkaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 09:19 PM   #23
72dually
Senior Member
 
72dually's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northern Arizona
Posts: 687
Thanks for the reply's
Im considering the whole shabang, but I'd like to hear from all sides, I love the detailed write up by MrShelley, who didnt do the arms, and I see the detailed write up this month (march issue) of StreetTrucks on the strong arm coolride set-up, but this is a magazine feature, which are known to sugar coat. Are the strong arms that exceptional?
72dually is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 12:21 AM   #24
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72dually
..... I love the detailed write up by MrShelley, who didnt do the arms, and I see the detailed write up this month (march issue) of StreetTrucks on the strong arm coolride set-up, but this is a magazine feature, which are known to sugar coat. Are the strong arms that exceptional?
They are well built & look nice. They correct geometry issues that arise from lowering. They can use either rubber or poly bushings, whichever you prefer. Their down side? . . ..... Cost.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 09:48 PM   #25
72dually
Senior Member
 
72dually's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northern Arizona
Posts: 687
Thanks SCOTI..........I understand the benefits, and yes there perty, but Im curious if the difference in handling/ride quality is that substancial, versus an air bagged truck w/stock control arms?
Also, how low before the geometry issue's come into play?

Thanks
72dually is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com