|
12-05-2009, 02:14 AM
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,080
|
Re: 60-72 rear suspension
Quote:
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
|
|
|
12-05-2009, 02:25 AM
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Galt, Calif
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: 60-72 rear suspension
Scoti are you talking bags for front and rear... or just rear..?
__________________
`64 C10 vortec 350/350/373 posi `69 RS/SS 350/350/308 `37 Ford 406/350/324 traclock `68 Dart 370/904/323 suregrip |
|
|
|
|
12-05-2009, 10:30 AM
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,080
|
Re: 60-72 rear suspension
Quote:
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
