The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Racing and high performance (trucks haulin more than hay)

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-07-2011, 06:41 PM   #26
shortbed70
Registered User
 
shortbed70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Forney TX
Posts: 4,512
Re: Anybody a running a sbc smaller than a 350?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68_chop_top View Post
I"m running a 327 10-1 pop up pistons, vortec heads with comp beehive springs, Comp 280/480 cam, performer intake Qjet HEI and headers. It is backed with a Tremec TKO 600 with 3.43 posi in the rear. I really love winding the gears. To come away from a light I have to rev to 1000 - 1200 to get her to go. It gets 15 mpg with AC and definetly 375 hp.
I am building a 496 bbc for replacement of the small displacement.
Anyone interested in a slightly used 327?
I have almost the same motor 280/480 cam,9.25-1 comp,procomp vortec heads 185cc runners and I might be that hp limit out of my 361 sbc. Or maybe Im just under estimating it!
__________________
Troy

1965 Chevy Bagged,361 sbc,voodoo cam,1.5 full roller rockers,patriot 185cc vortec heads 2.02-1.60,vortec weiand polished intake,demon carb

my truckhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=332884

Big Red Dog build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=572274
shortbed70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2011, 03:27 AM   #27
63chevyll
gets board easy.......
 
63chevyll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 717
Re: Anybody a running a sbc smaller than a 350?

i have a 327 in my 63 nova,

It does fine and i love them in light cars. good decent engine just dont expect a pure rocket, as others hav said nothing beats the cubes and extra TQ,

but, if i had any more power it would be crashed even harder or sooner.
63chevyll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2011, 10:39 AM   #28
team39763
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 469
Re: Anybody a running a sbc smaller than a 350?

I know there's no replacement for displacement, but sometimes I think the small cubes can have an advantage. At the place I race at, it's just an old unprepped airstrip that seems more slippery than the street. Me and a few other guys with small motors are able to get off the line without too much drama while the guys with big power/torque are left spinning or unable to hook up down the track.
__________________
1982 Silverado - SBE, cleaned up GM heads, small cam, TH350, 850 Demon, 4.56 gears, and caltracs.
Best time so far 11.8@XXXMPH
team39763 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2011, 02:25 PM   #29
Heavy Evy
born to lose
 
Heavy Evy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 842
Re: Anybody a running a sbc smaller than a 350?

my track here is real slippery too. getting out of the hole is pain if your a torque monster. will see how the 327 does if i don't like it i'll go back to the 383 i'm just trying to get into the 12's
Posted via Mobile Device
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
_____________________

'67 Chevy Belair Wagon 283 Powerglide
'68 Chevy II Nova 2 door 350 TH400 Sold!!
'71 Chevy C20 350 TH350
'71 Chevy C10 Burb 350 TH350 stolen totalled gone....

Burb Build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=475155

Nova Build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=498979

Wagon Build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=543052

Not giving a truck.
Heavy Evy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 10:17 PM   #30
chris mc bride
Registered User
 
chris mc bride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greensboro nc
Posts: 686
Re: Anybody a running a sbc smaller than a 350?

While Im not running any smaller engines right now i have. I had two 283 motors ,1-327 and a very fun 302. The 283s run great and are damn near indestructable. The 327 put quite a few 350s to shame. The 302 wasn't much on bottm but heck it didnt have topend limit I dont think. Iw would wind as long as the valve train kept up heck few times it went silent from floating everything I think and I jst grabed another gear and kept winding it.
Now if your out for max torque,cheaper build and milage its hard to beat cubic inches. My last 383 combo made over 450 hp and would get great milage if you kept your foot out of it.Heck with 4ps auto I could cruise at 70mph under 2000 rpm and barley touched the throttle.
chris mc bride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 11:49 PM   #31
OldCrLvr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ophir, CA
Posts: 39
Re: Anybody a running a sbc smaller than a 350?

I figured I would chime in. Last sumer my buddy and I did a 327 build for his 65 Elk. He was going for the Super Stock look.

It was a simple build. Flat tops, Solid FT Comp cam (224/230@50 .477/.488), 461 Fuelies with upgraded springs, Old Ass Eddy intake and Holley 600. I'll tell you what, when he runs through the gears and attemps to shift (auto tranny) at 6,500 it ends up being shifted at 7,000.
__________________
63 NovaSS
70 Custom/10 LWB
71 Malibu
00 Z71 ECSB
OldCrLvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com