10-07-2012, 06:05 PM | #26 | |
"Where were you in '62?"
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cleveland County, North Cackalacky
Posts: 5,013
|
Re: 283 vs. 350
Quote:
1 hp per cubic inch - 3.875 bore. 283c.i./Th350 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=382583 http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...y/viewall.html http://youtu.be/T87HNbYavnQ
__________________
PROJECT: "FULL METAL YELLOW JACKET" 1962 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed Nostalgia Pro/Street Pickup Truck PROJECT: "FULL METAL YELLOW JACKET Build Thread What Are You Workin' On? - 1Bad62ChevyPickup PROJECT: "TYRANNORAMBLER REX" 1969 AMC Rambler American Nostalgia Pro/Street Youtube Channel: Father Son Projects Youtube Channel: 2TIMOTHY2FITHTEEN "North and South Carolina Folks Click Here!" (((( ~ I have Parts For Sale & Miscellaneous Stuff ~ )))) "Well being as there's no other place around the place, I reckon this must be the place, I reckon...Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk" -Curly Howard Ph.D. |
|
10-07-2012, 06:24 PM | #27 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sidney,b.c.
Posts: 4,425
|
Re: 283 vs. 350
Quote:
ron |
|
10-07-2012, 09:14 PM | #28 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: southeasternfoothillsofusa
Posts: 1,557
|
Re: 283 vs. 350
Quote:
[[An interesting exception: There actually was one that I bought, from original owner, a farmer-friend, who told me it was good except rough on gas: was a 1973 longbed, 3-speed on column, a 6-cyl. with No p/s and NO p/b and even NO radio and NO leaks at all underneath--dry as a 'powder keg' was how we described them. It started perfectly cold and hot; accelerated smoothly as could be wanted both cold and hot. Had standard wheels and tires. Cruised effortlessly at 55, 65, 75, whatever the driver wanted. It got, at very best, 6 mpg! (This exception was intentionally excluded above in the 10-13 range!) I drove it to a town 60 miles away to pick up a windshield; put in 10 gallons as I was leaving which reflected on the gauge; before returning from that town, gauge showed E, so I put in 10 more gallons, which again reflected on the gauge. Was back on E when I got back to shop. Drove it home that nite, about 4-5 miles, and ran out of gas in my driveway. All this during higher-priced gas, about 1975-76. Got it to the sale, auctioneer asked discreetly what the least I would take for it--had it looking good--my reply was 'reckon we will get a bid'? i.e., it was on a 1-way trip!]] So, my overall theory is that regardless of engine size, our boxy Chevy pickups are prone to poor gas mileage. And if the smaller, weaker engines get 13, why not get good power and maybe no worse than 10?...or maybe no worse than 13? **Math is often funny: Gaining from 10 to 13 shows to be 30% better:3/10=30%. Yet losing from 13 to 10 is only 23% worse: 3/13=23%! |
|
10-07-2012, 09:19 PM | #29 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Graham, WA
Posts: 136
|
Re: 283 vs. 350
|
10-07-2012, 10:02 PM | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: southeasternfoothillsofusa
Posts: 1,557
|
Re: 283 vs. 350
To determine if it is a powerglide, simply count the gear-detents at the selector on the trans--pg has P, N, D, L, & R...for total of 5 positions.
Six positions indicate a THM--either 350THM(squarish pan missing 1 corner) or 400THM(non-squarish pan). To id all GM trannies, including metrics(having letters on pan) by pan shape, here is a good site: >> http://www.nastyz28.com/chevy-transm...tification.php << Last edited by luvbowties; 10-07-2012 at 10:05 PM. Reason: add metric-info |
01-02-2013, 03:46 AM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6
|
Re: 283 vs. 350
What if tranny selector only has four positions=PNRD? What kind of auto trans is it?
|
Bookmarks |
|
|