The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2012, 06:05 PM   #26
1Bad62Pro/Street
"Where were you in '62?"
 
1Bad62Pro/Street's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cleveland County, North Cackalacky
Posts: 5,013
Thumbs up Re: 283 vs. 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hogsophist View Post
Having this same internal question now! Love this site.

Bone stock 283 in my 57.
Th350 transmission
Rear end out of 79 trans am ( still not sure on the gears, need to open it up)

It drives fine. No leaks or smoke. Seems I have read these engines like running at higher rpms. Gas mileage is around 10 mpg, which is horrible.

Is this a good combo?
Is the mpg way out of wack?

Bring forth your opinions. I'm not a mechanic so all thoughts would be great.
Posted via Mobile Device
Thumbs Up!
1 hp per cubic inch - 3.875 bore.
283c.i./Th350
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=382583
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...y/viewall.html


http://youtu.be/T87HNbYavnQ
__________________
PROJECT: "FULL METAL YELLOW JACKET"
1962 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed Nostalgia Pro/Street Pickup Truck
PROJECT: "FULL METAL YELLOW JACKET Build Thread
What Are You Workin' On? - 1Bad62ChevyPickup
PROJECT: "TYRANNORAMBLER REX"
1969 AMC Rambler American Nostalgia Pro/Street
Youtube Channel: Father Son Projects
Youtube Channel: 2TIMOTHY2FITHTEEN

"North and South Carolina Folks Click Here!"
(((( ~ I have Parts For Sale & Miscellaneous Stuff ~ ))))

"Well being as there's no other place around the place,
I reckon this must be the place, I reckon...Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk" -Curly Howard Ph.D.
1Bad62Pro/Street is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 06:24 PM   #27
padresag
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sidney,b.c.
Posts: 4,425
Re: 283 vs. 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Bad62Pro/Street View Post
but not every 283 is 1hp per c/in. the 230 hp(the old p/pack eng) is a nice little engine esp with 4:11 axle and an o/drive
ron
padresag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 09:14 PM   #28
luvbowties
Registered User
 
luvbowties's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: southeasternfoothillsofusa
Posts: 1,557
Question Re: 283 vs. 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by revjim View Post
Need your opinion. I have two engines ...an original 283 195 hp. And I have a 350 LM1 engine. Both have auto trannies. However the 350 tranny had to have a fabbed transmission mount. The frame I want to use came with the original 283. What would you rather have? I am not so worried about power as I am dependability and ease of maintenance. Plus I am not wild about fabbing a new tranny bracket. Let me know.
I reckon it's time for my input. During many years of owning many '60's-'70's Chevy pickups (as I was in the used car business & specializing in pickups, using whatever eng. came in a purchase or installing whatever was conveniently available in wrecks)with different sized 6's and different size v8's(5 sizes of v8 sbc's), there is 1 thing I have noticed: none of them were what one would call good on gas. The range on the ones I checked was around 10'ish to 13'ish.

[[An interesting exception: There actually was one that I bought, from original owner, a farmer-friend, who told me it was good except rough on gas: was a 1973 longbed, 3-speed on column, a 6-cyl. with No p/s and NO p/b and even NO radio and NO leaks at all underneath--dry as a 'powder keg' was how we described them. It started perfectly cold and hot; accelerated smoothly as could be wanted both cold and hot. Had standard wheels and tires. Cruised effortlessly at 55, 65, 75, whatever the driver wanted. It got, at very best, 6 mpg! (This exception was intentionally excluded above in the 10-13 range!) I drove it to a town 60 miles away to pick up a windshield; put in 10 gallons as I was leaving which reflected on the gauge; before returning from that town, gauge showed E, so I put in 10 more gallons, which again reflected on the gauge. Was back on E when I got back to shop. Drove it home that nite, about 4-5 miles, and ran out of gas in my driveway. All this during higher-priced gas, about 1975-76. Got it to the sale, auctioneer asked discreetly what the least I would take for it--had it looking good--my reply was 'reckon we will get a bid'? i.e., it was on a 1-way trip!]]

So, my overall theory is that regardless of engine size, our boxy Chevy pickups are prone to poor gas mileage. And if the smaller, weaker engines get 13, why not get good power and maybe no worse than 10?...or maybe no worse than 13?

**Math is often funny: Gaining from 10 to 13 shows to be 30% better:3/10=30%. Yet losing from 13 to 10 is only 23% worse: 3/13=23%!
luvbowties is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 09:19 PM   #29
63ChevC10
Registered User
 
63ChevC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Graham, WA
Posts: 136
Re: 283 vs. 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pop's C-10 View Post
283..jus cause it a 283..
Amen to that!
63ChevC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 10:02 PM   #30
luvbowties
Registered User
 
luvbowties's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: southeasternfoothillsofusa
Posts: 1,557
Question Re: 283 vs. 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by revjim View Post
how do I tell what tranny I have...what ID am I looking for??
To determine if it is a powerglide, simply count the gear-detents at the selector on the trans--pg has P, N, D, L, & R...for total of 5 positions.

Six positions indicate a THM--either 350THM(squarish pan missing 1 corner) or 400THM(non-squarish pan).

To id all GM trannies, including metrics(having letters on pan) by pan shape, here is a good site:
>> http://www.nastyz28.com/chevy-transm...tification.php <<

Last edited by luvbowties; 10-07-2012 at 10:05 PM. Reason: add metric-info
luvbowties is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 03:46 AM   #31
Project 1960 Apache
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6
Re: 283 vs. 350

What if tranny selector only has four positions=PNRD? What kind of auto trans is it?
Project 1960 Apache is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com