Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-16-2012, 06:25 AM | #26 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: phx, az
Posts: 868
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
im partial to lowered, but a nice lifted square is just as hot. |
12-16-2012, 08:32 AM | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,189
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
If you use a truck as a truck, then I don't know how you could have a significantly lowered one. Seems like you lose a lot of cargo capacity. Considering how much gas our trucks pig, I would not use mine for anything but truck purposes. But each to his or her own.
|
12-16-2012, 09:03 AM | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Memphis MI
Posts: 1,851
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
If I wanted a low vehicle I'd buy a car. I drive 2 miles of dirt to get to pavement, crappy roads then. And I don't slow down or dodge for pot holes.
My favorite is 1/2 tons with 16" wheels to help fill up the wheel well, or light 3/4 tons. I do appreciate the effort ant thought it takes to do a great looking lwered truck. But my 1/2 ton is just right - I hook a cheekd on the seat and slide across the vinyl without having to bend my stiff old knees much.
__________________
1987 2 ton 1982 250/TH350 beater in progress Dad's 1981 3/4 L6 3 on tree posi and no options, awaiting restoration or scrapping Plus a mess o' tractors |
12-16-2012, 09:10 AM | #29 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 131
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
Depends on the rims and tires.
I have steel wheels and dog dishes on my stepper, and stock height just looks best to me. For now. If I can find some classic-looking rims that are wider, I'd lower the stance a little. Best of both worlds I'd find a pair of stock steel rims and have them widened for 10" rears. Different strokes.... Posted via Mobile Device |
12-16-2012, 09:41 AM | #30 |
No No
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pueblo Colorado
Posts: 1,781
|
I lowered mine I did not go extreme like alot of people it was just the sport kit from beltech makes it a little lower in the front and makes the back level. I use stock height tires honestly I don't like the ride but I like the look. funny thing is when I lowered my 76 it ended up being close to the ride height as my stock 86 of course the back of the 86 is taller. the man reason I lowered it was to level out the back and get rid of the hug space between the wheel and the bed. I've been thinking alot out un lowering my truck for a long time to get some ride quality back
Posted from 67-72chevytrucks.com App for Android
__________________
1976 Custom Deluxe SWB Med FMB.3/4 Drop. Gen VI 454, Muncie HD 3 speed With Modified OE Hurst Shifter, 3.73 12 bolt, GMPP HO roller cam, Hooker headers, Performer intake with modified Q-jet, Accel distributor. Best 1/4 12.3 @108. Funnest run 19.84 @88 full 1/4 mile burn out. 1997 K1500 ext cab 5.7 stock except muffler |
12-16-2012, 10:00 AM | #31 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: phx, az
Posts: 868
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
|
12-16-2012, 03:59 PM | #32 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: houston, texas
Posts: 1,974
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
Im keeping my 76 stock height, lowered looks good in pics but rides like crap....not sacrificing this time
__________________
2008 Silverado Z71 RCSB 1991 GMC Jimmy 4x4 1976 GMC Sierra C15 SWB |
12-16-2012, 04:18 PM | #33 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ottawa ON
Posts: 514
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
Is it possible to be in the middle lol, I wouldn't slam a truck on the ground but i found my truck at sock height was too high, especially for a 2 wheel drive. I went 2'' in the front and 4'' in the rear and I think it sits just right. I can haul and tow just fine.
Keith seymour's truck was my inspiration. |
12-16-2012, 04:24 PM | #34 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: ottawa,canada
Posts: 4,550
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
.....stock height is terrible.....either a slammmed 2wd, or a lifted 4x4 anything but stock for me.....
__________________
my build threads '86 C10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=415628 '67 C10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=635078 '63 GMC http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=674682 |
12-16-2012, 04:42 PM | #35 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sparta, WI
Posts: 86
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
Lowered like Telecasterjoeys truck is about as low as I would go. Stock height for 4wd is my preferance, thats why I removed the 4" lift from my recently purchased 85 K5 Blazer.
__________________
Eric 2001 Ford F350 EC dually 7.3 1981 Chevy C20 to K20 350 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme 455 Pontiac 1969 Pontiac GTO 400 |
12-16-2012, 04:54 PM | #36 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Bradford, PA
Posts: 395
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
I like the low look of 2wd squares, but with 15-16" wheels. Not a fan of anything bigger than 17's on anything. Looks out of place on an old truck IMHO (No offense to anyone). I also love a lifted 4x4 with 15-16" wheels.
__________________
1981 K10 Scottsdale
305 ci | TH350 | NP208 | 60k miles |
12-16-2012, 05:04 PM | #37 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Arlington WA
Posts: 1,728
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
Quote:
__________________
GMC C15 355 SM465 3.73 80 C10 cruiser build thread 79 short stepside crew cab. big and ugly. build thread |
|
12-16-2012, 05:15 PM | #38 |
Square
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Posts: 1,568
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
my truck laid pinch with 22's and I never once had a problem with not fitting something in the back. had multiple dirt bikes, a bed full of lumber, helped move a friend with it.. anything you can think of. the height of the suspension doesn't restrict to load capacity, the way the truck was built does. as far as going off road.. well most people that live in the city don't own a truck for that reason. I never ran into a situation where I needed to go somewhere where I couldn't. and, Its hard for some people to grasp the concept but, most people that have trucks didn't buy them to go off roading in. the ones that do, don't use stock trucks for the most part. they alter the suspension. sometimes adding lifts, roll cages and spare tire racks that ALSO restrict the use of the bed.
This topic pops up every few months. If the OP would have just used the search function he could have seen that most people on the forum customize there trucks to their liking. and that most of this forum agrees that just because you are attracted to the looks of a truck instead of a car it doesn't mean you have to constantly be hauling something to justify it.
__________________
Squarebody Syndicate |
12-16-2012, 05:30 PM | #39 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: washington
Posts: 4,178
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
I love mine low but I had a stock hight truck once with no swaybar and said there is no excuse for driving a truck that could be put handled by a school bus. If anything if I want to use my truck like a truck I see no reason for two feet clearance on a 2wd a 3-4 drop works for me and if anything I think it should have come from the factory like that
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
377 sbc thumpr cam autogear m23 muncie 3:73 Detroit trutrac 3''spintech prostreet mufflers xpipe 1 3/4 headers build thread !http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=577217 Iroc gauge threadhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=554511 |
12-16-2012, 05:33 PM | #40 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 2,705
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
Stock is boring!
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
2018 Audi S5- wife's ride 1980 Chevy Scottsdale http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=543511 1981 Chevy Silverado- in pieces 1964 Chevy c10 2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU |
12-16-2012, 06:14 PM | #41 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Arlington WA
Posts: 1,728
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
thats one thing i like about the d100's. a small child cant walk under them
__________________
GMC C15 355 SM465 3.73 80 C10 cruiser build thread 79 short stepside crew cab. big and ugly. build thread |
12-16-2012, 06:26 PM | #42 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ylojarvi, Finland
Posts: 67
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
I agree, stock height and at least 8x15" wheels, maybe 10x15 looks good.. love that blue/gray truck in the photo!
__________________
1987 Chevrolet Scottsdale R10 Diesel "gasoline is for washing your paint brush" |
12-16-2012, 07:11 PM | #43 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Arlington WA
Posts: 1,728
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
Quote:
__________________
GMC C15 355 SM465 3.73 80 C10 cruiser build thread 79 short stepside crew cab. big and ugly. build thread |
|
12-16-2012, 08:29 PM | #44 |
Alright Alright Alright
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Midland, Texas
Posts: 1,672
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
I think that stock height on 275/60/15s all the way around is an unbeatable look in my opinion. My 72 cheyenne and 78 shorty chevy sport van on rallys have this treatment.
__________________
1972 Cheyenne Chevrolet red and white 357ci, Vortec heads, GM Performance high rise intake, Comp 268H .454/.454 218/218 110 LSA Quadrajet carb, Flowtech headers, 2.25 40 series HEI, Curve kit, TH 350, 3.07 gears 275/60/15s on 15x8 rallies |
12-16-2012, 08:32 PM | #45 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: houston, texas
Posts: 1,974
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
im keeping mine stock for the originality of it, my last 85 was 3/5 drop on 17's and I loved it, Jimmy was 6" lift on 36's......myself.....I just want a change on this one and to me that equals non-modified suspension.
__________________
2008 Silverado Z71 RCSB 1991 GMC Jimmy 4x4 1976 GMC Sierra C15 SWB |
12-16-2012, 09:41 PM | #46 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glenville, Pa
Posts: 445
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
I like being able to change my oil without a floor jack. Much easier to work on at stock height or higher.
__________________
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=355153 |
12-17-2012, 12:27 AM | #47 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: baytown, texas
Posts: 310
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
On a STOCK 2wd 1/2ton... what's the measurement from center of hub to top of wheel well? Front and back
Posted via Mobile Device |
12-17-2012, 08:24 AM | #48 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Clute, TX.
Posts: 1,935
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
My 87 is stock except for the 2in shackles in back. My 82 is lifted 4 inches, 4x4
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
2004 Silverado Crewcab 1972 Chevy Monte Carlo 2017 Chevy Tahoe |
12-17-2012, 11:07 AM | #49 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Ponca City, OK
Posts: 134
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
I started out wanting to stay at stock height but after looking at lots of lowered trucks I changed my mind and lowered it... I like it, If you like it thats all that matters!
__________________
1993 Silverado C2500 Single Cab LWB 2007 Chevy Silverado 1500 Crew Cab LTZ 4x4 1974 AMC Matador Coupe - The Mat |
12-17-2012, 01:40 PM | #50 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: houston, texas
Posts: 1,974
|
Re: Anyone else prefer stock ride height?
I looked a long time for an unmolested truck so I'm keeping mine stock
__________________
2008 Silverado Z71 RCSB 1991 GMC Jimmy 4x4 1976 GMC Sierra C15 SWB |
Bookmarks |
|
|