Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-07-2016, 10:33 AM | #26 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Indpls. , IN
Posts: 795
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
Just to confuse - where does the un-loved 307 lay in this debate ? Is it the best of both worlds, or neither ?? LOL...
__________________
Tim K. 84 K30 srw Silverado 454 auto 85 C20 350 C6P auto flatbed 94 K1500 lifted shortbed 350 4 bbl NV4500 |
|
04-07-2016, 10:34 AM | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prescott, Arizona
Posts: 2,396
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
305's do what GM intended. I think the reason some remove it in a truck application, is likely the same reason I wouldn't buy a truck with one. As far as trucks go I use them to haul and tow, so I prefer big blocks. 305 pickups are also cheaper to buy so that may interest some that plan a motor swap later. Nothing really wrong with the engine though, it's just small and performs just as you would expect a small engine to do.
Doesn't mean I'm not a small engine fan. We have a 69 Z with it's original 302, my wife drives it. Fun little engine to buzz around in. GM packaged that one right, fairly nimble driving car, light weight, and only come in 4-speeds. 3.73 was the standard gear with others optional. Yeah it likes RPM but has no trouble at all lugging around town either. Again, it's geared properly and in a light car. It's not an engine I'd want in a pickup truck however. With that said, it's completely different from a 305. 302's were designed for a more specific use and has absolutely nothing in common with a 305 from a design standpoint. |
04-07-2016, 10:41 AM | #28 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carmichael, California
Posts: 3,006
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
As mentioned the 302 can be a docile daily drivable engine but it's not ideal for a heavy truck. Im a big fan of smaller engine especially as well, usually fall back onto 327s, but I know enough about engine performance after 25+ yrs of messing with them to know that each engine enables has its place. Short stroke engines don't belong in heavy vehicles.
__________________
Anthony |
|
04-07-2016, 10:45 AM | #29 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carmichael, California
Posts: 3,006
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
__________________
Anthony |
|
04-07-2016, 10:49 AM | #30 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prescott, Arizona
Posts: 2,396
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
Shucks I wouldn't even tow my 16' flat bed with a car on it with a 305 It's just miserable, I've been down that road before. |
|
04-07-2016, 10:55 AM | #31 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carmichael, California
Posts: 3,006
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
Bottom line is there is nothing wrong with a 305 engine. No it wont make the power of a bigger engine but they are still good work engines.
__________________
Anthony |
|
04-07-2016, 11:18 AM | #32 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Indpls. , IN
Posts: 795
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
...yes, I do know the bore and stroke (and of all 3). Have a '71 307 languishing in the garage right now, shame it's of no use to me - it's low mileage.
The very small bore of the 305 helped with emissions - which at the time was probably their main concern. GM's small engines have a history of using existing current (at their build time) crank strokes of their larger brothers. Olds '68 to '69 400 and 455. Olds 260, 307, 330, 350, and 403 - all the same stroke. Buick 430 and 455 Pontiac 326, 350, 389, & 400 Chevy 307 and 327. 305 and 350. 396 and 427
__________________
Tim K. 84 K30 srw Silverado 454 auto 85 C20 350 C6P auto flatbed 94 K1500 lifted shortbed 350 4 bbl NV4500 |
04-07-2016, 11:21 AM | #33 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carmichael, California
Posts: 3,006
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
__________________
Anthony |
|
04-07-2016, 01:04 PM | #34 | |
driving is in my blood
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,748
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle. -98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes. -02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front -CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me. |
|
04-07-2016, 02:05 PM | #35 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Downers Grove IL
Posts: 37
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
I had and bought new a 1978 C10 with a 305. At 66,000 miles the cam shaft failed, for some reason GM used soft steel and the cams wore out. I had the camshaft replaced. 12,000 miles later that 305 started burning a lot of oil.
All said I have a bad taste for the 305. But if you have one and it runs good drive it. A year after I sold the truck I found out GM had a recall for the camshaft defect, so I submitted my repair receipts and GM reimbursed me. |
04-07-2016, 04:02 PM | #36 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prescott, Arizona
Posts: 2,396
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
Yeah apparently some people's idea of how good a 305 tow's is WAY different than mine. I'm sure they can pull something. Just don't be in front of me when we hit the next hill, lol. |
|
04-07-2016, 04:05 PM | #37 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carmichael, California
Posts: 3,006
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
I never said it was. But I have enough experience to know that a longer stroke in a heavy vehicle puts you ahead of the "torque production" game.
Back in the day you could get a truck with a 307 but the experts at GM decided that the 305 was a better engine. There is no reason to not use a 305 in a truck unless you are doing some heavy hauling and in many cases even the 350 wont be up to the task. For a daily driver, like mine, there is really no reason to go to a bigger engine. THe only reason I would do it is costs. It`s actually cheaper to buy a 350 crate engine than to rebuild a 305. Hell the 305 long block from GM cost more than their 350 crate. Doesnt make a lot of sense there but thats what it is. This isnt rocket science guys. Some of you just seem to want to argue over nothing. Someone disagrees with you so you argue to prove a point. no possible way the 305 could be a decent engine, right? Whatever. Go ahead, put a large bore short stroke engine in your 5000lb truck and enjoy it. I`m plenty happy with my 305 and not that I got the carb rebuilt and everything is working as it should it makes plenty of power and brings in some decent mileage.
__________________
Anthony |
04-07-2016, 04:11 PM | #38 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 217
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
There will always be people who think 305 = garbage, no matter how eloquent or convicing your argument may be. This industry has about a 2:1 ratio of bad information to good information, so it's no surprise how many myths are out there.
__________________
Current Projects: 1984 GMC, LWB Fleetside, 305/350 - Currently Doing TBI Conversion 1966 GMC, SWB Stepside, 350/200-4R - Currently waiting patiently. |
|
04-07-2016, 04:11 PM | #39 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prescott, Arizona
Posts: 2,396
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Relax, no one is arguing anything here that I've seen. Just simply stating some opinions as to what the OP originally asked. Oberon is the one asking but you seem to be taking offense to it. It's all good bud. You have one so you're a little bias, that's okay. If you're happy with your 305 that's all that matters. Just because some of us don't want one doesn't mean it's a horrible engine, never said it was.
|
04-07-2016, 04:24 PM | #40 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carmichael, California
Posts: 3,006
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
Quote:
One of the reasons I came back to this site from a very good performance site is anytime someone asked about something that wasnt the "in thing" they were trashed and made to feel like they were scum for even asking about it. This site never use to be that way, which is why I came back, but I see it slowly getting there.
__________________
Anthony |
||
04-07-2016, 04:29 PM | #41 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 146
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
I certainly can't say I'm disappointed by the discussion on this thread. The sort of back-and-forth I'm seeing gives me an opportunity to see all the sides of the issue. It also makes me wonder if at some point down the road there will be plenty of spare 305s lying around in peoples' garages.
|
04-07-2016, 04:32 PM | #42 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prescott, Arizona
Posts: 2,396
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
I don't see any bashing, it all looks pretty civil to me with just opinions stated :shrug:
|
04-07-2016, 04:37 PM | #43 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 217
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
I guess people don't want to accept that 4 cylinder engines can be (and have been) built that chew up V8s and spit them out.
__________________
Current Projects: 1984 GMC, LWB Fleetside, 305/350 - Currently Doing TBI Conversion 1966 GMC, SWB Stepside, 350/200-4R - Currently waiting patiently. |
|
04-07-2016, 08:13 PM | #44 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Posts: 252
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
Quote:
The challenge there is everyone has a different view of the World and what's in it. If you can learn to share space with people who's opinions oppose yours, then life gets a lot easier. The problems usually begin when people are true believers = my view of the subject is the only legitimate truth. It can get worse when it goes from an argument between 2 people into a group monkey dance where Imaginary Status is on the line. Reality is there are many opinions, experiences, and truths for individual people. 305 is an awesome motor 305 is a piece of crap Both statements are true depending on the individual.
__________________
Folks that throw dirt on you aren't always trying to hurt you, and folks that pull you out of a jam aren't always trying to help you. |
||
04-07-2016, 08:49 PM | #45 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carmichael, California
Posts: 3,006
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
I get a kick out of these subtle implications. Once false information hits the internet it instantly becomes truth.
Yes bigger engine can make more power but that doesn't mean the smaller engines are junk or not worth building.
__________________
Anthony |
04-07-2016, 09:54 PM | #46 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Alberta
Posts: 464
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
I agree 100% you think like I do. I run 305's from 200$ Grand Prix and Parisienne cars in wasted rusty trucks in high school. I have a huge stash of "throwaway" "junk" engines. old 265's,283's to 305 and 307's to 250/292's. I like the integrated intake 250, and the 6.2. Sometimes 120 or 200 HP is all you need or want. Here anyway a lot of people are going back to the Inlines and putting 283's back in the cars they threw away years ago and searching and searching for correct parts. I suspect 305's will be the most valuable in many years to come. They are almost all thrown away
__________________
-Cody |
04-07-2016, 10:01 PM | #47 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Alberta
Posts: 464
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
__________________
-Cody |
|
04-08-2016, 05:43 PM | #48 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 217
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
I've had people offer to give me plenty of 305s, I just didn't have anything (at the time) I could do with them.
__________________
Current Projects: 1984 GMC, LWB Fleetside, 305/350 - Currently Doing TBI Conversion 1966 GMC, SWB Stepside, 350/200-4R - Currently waiting patiently. |
|
04-09-2016, 12:55 AM | #49 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: El Dorado Ca
Posts: 3,374
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
I have a 305 I bought from my son, he was parting out an 86? 1/2 ton I think it was, the engine ran great, so I bought it and it is in my shop waiting to be put in my '70 jeep at a later date...
|
04-09-2016, 06:21 PM | #50 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 1,212
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Why the Hatin'?
Well, some people can live with a 305, towing, driving, cruising. The guy I bought my GMC from, he is that guy. He is Mr Slow and Steady. The 305 suits his driving style perfectly. These guys fall into the same catagory who feel that the straight 6 is a suitable truck engine (be it the Ford or GM guys). I admire their resolve and ability to be satisified with slow and steady... Me? Not a chance. I drive it like I stole it. I prefer to get up to the speed limit promptly. When I pass somebody, I prefer to pass them yesterday. When I am towing, I like some grunt, and some in reserve just in case. I can't leave anything alone anyways and always end up modifying what I drive. In the case of a 305, you gain very little for your dollar, a 350 or bigger gives you more bang for your modification buck. Back in my stop light drag days, you had some guys who sunk money into their 305's. Well, they sunk money into them alright for very little gain. Put that same cash and or mods into a 350+ and you see more return for your dollar. We even had two glutons for punishment that decided to hot rod their slant 6's. Man, they spent crazy money and did not manage to do any better than a guy with a stock 350 with just a dual exhaust and maybe headers. What they got for their money was a level of performance that let them play with the v8's. All that is said with respect to the previous era's engines. With todays engine management and manufacturers efforts to get every last drop of performance and fuel economy has put things on a whole other level. But in short, if you have a tendency to modify, and like things to be more zippy, a larger engine is the more economical choice long term. Alex. |
Bookmarks |
|
|