The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-18-2022, 06:40 PM   #26
Corts60
Just here to tinker
 
Corts60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 3,697
Re: 4.3 v6 ????

I had a TBI version of the 4.3 in my 1991 G van. It got a solid 15 mpg all day long. Maybe I could get 17 if I behaved, but rarely. It pulled my 1500 lb camper ok. Didn't like hills, but would pull the camper at 65 all day. It is not a powerhouse nor a fuel miser. But a good engine. One thing to consider is their inherent vibration issues. It can be annoying at stop lights if you live in the city.
Corts60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2022, 11:50 AM   #27
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Re: 4.3 v6 ????

Quote:
Originally Posted by theastronaut View Post
Even if you already have the engine and it cost you nothing, resale value will be way down compared to a V8. Its the same amount of work to swap in a small block or 5.3, and whatever extra you spend swapping in the V8 would more than be repaid if you ever sold it. I think a 5.3 with sequential multiport efi and much better ignition mapping would get as good or better mileage than an older gen 4.3. We have a '97 S10 with a W code 4.3 and 5 speed, it's just ok in a small truck. My '89 Ford Festiva with only ~80 hp will keep up with it from a stop.
I agree from a ROI perspective. But if the 4.3/4l60e combo were free & I didn't have a small V8 (5.3 or decent sbc) already, I'd consider the 4.3 swap.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2022, 12:40 PM   #28
vince1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary Alberta
Posts: 1,170
Re: 4.3 v6 ????

Some will go a lot of miles. My brother in law gave a still running P/U to his daughter and that one had close to 500k kms (300k mi) on it.

The 89 Astro van that I bought new and eventually replaced the head gasket on still leaked afterwards.

My 90 Astro van with the leaking coolant came to me when it was almost new and I managed to coax almost 400k kms out of it by using an annual or more can of bars leak. Once, when the fan came off the water pump hub and went through the rad, I was surprised that it wasn't all plugged up inside.

Has no else had this left rear cylinder leak Problem?
__________________
66 fleetside 350 4sp
vince1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2022, 01:38 PM   #29
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Re: 4.3 v6 ????

The 4.3/NV3500/3.42's in this truck ran fine all the way to about 250k. It had plenty of power for the DD job until the end (something failed in the valvetrain coming home from GoodGuys Spring show of '21).

It's getting a re-freshed Gen IV 5.3 w/a Stage 2 truck cam & 4l60e w/a V6 converter. In hindsight, he wishes he would have just rebuilt the 4.3 because it's still not complete. It's hard to quickly get things nicely done when working part-time/nights on a shoe-string budget....
Attached Images
  
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2022, 12:29 PM   #30
richards72chevy
Registered User
 
richards72chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: konawa ok/oakdale Ca.
Posts: 1,652
Re: 4.3 v6 ????

There was build thread on here a few years ago were someone swapped a 60-66 cab on to an S10 floor pan with a 4 cylinder.
richards72chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2022, 07:08 PM   #31
murdoc
Registered User
 
murdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: nampa, idaho
Posts: 332
Re: 4.3 v6 ????

Coolant leaks usually come from the intake manifold. I have had to do a couple of them before. I think the manifold had a tendency to warp over time, that or the intake gasket would fail. Not the easiest to get to in a van, but solved the problem for me both times.
murdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2022, 07:52 PM   #32
AcampoDave
Registered User
 
AcampoDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,776
Re: 4.3 v6 ????

Quote:
Originally Posted by murdoc View Post
Coolant leaks usually come from the intake manifold. I have had to do a couple of them before. I think the manifold had a tendency to warp over time, that or the intake gasket would fail. Not the easiest to get to in a van, but solved the problem for me both times.
I remember that happened to my parents '01 V6 powered Grand Prix. It was a long time ago and I was surprised that the intake was some kind of plastic composite piece. (These days if course it's not a shocker). They had it fixed and my mom is still driving it. She's in her 80s now and the car still has less than a hundred thou on it and with a good detaing job it would still look pretty new.
AcampoDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2022, 04:03 PM   #33
oldtrux
Registered User
 
oldtrux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bancroft, ontario
Posts: 555
Re: 4.3 v6 ????

I too have had a few 4.3 engines and put 460km on one and was still running when i got rid of it!they are good engines but not without coolant issues and they are not great on fuel! I would personally hunt down a 4.8 l20 small v8. Simple drop in and also will get the same fuel mileage as the v6. Nice thing about 4.8 it doesn’t have that afm garbage! Just my opinion!
oldtrux is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com