The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-09-2016, 09:37 PM   #51
Hubscrub
Cruzin
 
Hubscrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: on the road
Posts: 2,835
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?

I like almost all old chevy engines and mopar v8. I don't diesels and fords lol.I get alot of when ya gonna change it out when I talk about my 86 monte carlo ss with a 305 HO. Most reliable engine ive owned it's staying and 24 miles a gallon with the quadrajet and decent power great cruising car. All engines have there purpose.
__________________
Lime Wife's 67https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...wZEMODaS2d94u8

Back to the Fifties 59 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...NAeStpydfrcj_U

Proverbs 3:5,6

"Thanks to the Interstate Highway System, it is now possible to travel across the country from coast to coast without seeing anything."Charles Kuralt

In memory of our first baby daughter, daddy and mommy love you.
Danica Grace 6/26/14
Hubscrub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2016, 11:10 PM   #52
barry1982
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Waskatenau, Alberta
Posts: 259
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?

I had a few 305's. Pulled the 6 out of a 76 half ton 4 speed and dropped in a 305. With the low gears, it was a big improvement. My family car was an 84 Caprice Classic with a 305 4 BBL and a 700 R4. Great car..... hauled the family in comfort, and still pulled off 26 MPG. Bought an 87 Silverado Short box fleet
side brand new in Nov 86 with a 305 TBI and a 700R4. Again, great truck and very economical. The early 305's (and 350's in that era) used to eat cams. I can still hear that dreaded "pop, pop" coming out of the carb indicting a flat lobe on the cam. I believe it wasn't bad cams, but bad lifters. The lifter would wear down, making sharp edges. Those edges would "machine" down a cam lobe in no time. Every cam I changed had lifter edges that could cut your finger. Everyone is different. Some guys like big power, others like better mileage. There is no right answer.
barry1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2016, 01:15 PM   #53
slotard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 877
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blessed66 View Post
The old phrase of "there is no replacement for displacement" carries a lot of weight with many people, and the fallacy of it seems to go unmentioned. Obviously, there is some truth to the phrase, but it's not always a night and day difference - like people may want to believe.

I guess people don't want to accept that 4 cylinder engines can be (and have been) built that chew up V8s and spit them out.
Correct, there are certainly reasonable replacements for displacement. Good heads and boost can help a lot. However, if you already picked your platform (for example, SBC) and how civilized you want it to be (DD vs street/strip vs track only), and have a budget, displacement tends to be very helpful for getting good power. If you start with no parts, $5k parts/machine shop budget, the 350 will pretty much always walk all over the 305... but a 383 will walk on the 350, and so on. The cost of extra displacement is relatively low vs amazing heads, and extra displacement helps get you more power without losing streetability. A 450hp 350 can be a reasonable DD, a 450hp 305 won't work as well there.

Of course, for plenty of people a 200hp 305 is all they need and they're happy with it, and get better mileage. Nothing wrong with that.
__________________
1973 C20, 350/350
slotard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2016, 02:01 PM   #54
Blessed66
Registered User
 
Blessed66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 217
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?

Quote:
Originally Posted by slotard View Post
Of course, for plenty of people a 200hp 305 is all they need and they're happy with it, and get better mileage. Nothing wrong with that.
Exactly, this.

The highest output 305 truck engine was the 220hp, 290 lb-ft L30 Vortec engine. Now, they weren't setting the world on fire with their performance, but they were strong engines in their own right. Were I building a cruiser, there would be nothing wrong with those numbers.

Were I building a "performance" vehicle, yes, I would definately replace it with something else - not because a 305 is "junk" - but because a 5.7 or a 5.3 is a better starting point in the realm of performance. It's the "baseline" to work from because years of engine building, hot-rodding and engineering have taught us all that the 350 or 325 Gen 3+ are capable of amazing performance without major modifications.

Now, if you want to fly against the majority and build a reliable 500+hp 305, you would not find me in the line of people waiting to tell you "I told you so!" when it blows up. If you want to do it, it's your project, go for it!

Just understanding that the 305 isn't the ideal starting point of a performance build doesn't disqualify it as a great engine.
__________________
Current Projects:
1984 GMC, LWB Fleetside, 305/350 - Currently Doing TBI Conversion
1966 GMC, SWB Stepside, 350/200-4R - Currently waiting patiently.
Blessed66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com