Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-09-2016, 09:37 PM | #51 |
Cruzin
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: on the road
Posts: 2,835
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
I like almost all old chevy engines and mopar v8. I don't diesels and fords lol.I get alot of when ya gonna change it out when I talk about my 86 monte carlo ss with a 305 HO. Most reliable engine ive owned it's staying and 24 miles a gallon with the quadrajet and decent power great cruising car. All engines have there purpose.
__________________
Lime Wife's 67https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...wZEMODaS2d94u8 Back to the Fifties 59 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...NAeStpydfrcj_U Proverbs 3:5,6 "Thanks to the Interstate Highway System, it is now possible to travel across the country from coast to coast without seeing anything."Charles Kuralt In memory of our first baby daughter, daddy and mommy love you. Danica Grace 6/26/14
|
04-09-2016, 11:10 PM | #52 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Waskatenau, Alberta
Posts: 259
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
I had a few 305's. Pulled the 6 out of a 76 half ton 4 speed and dropped in a 305. With the low gears, it was a big improvement. My family car was an 84 Caprice Classic with a 305 4 BBL and a 700 R4. Great car..... hauled the family in comfort, and still pulled off 26 MPG. Bought an 87 Silverado Short box fleet
side brand new in Nov 86 with a 305 TBI and a 700R4. Again, great truck and very economical. The early 305's (and 350's in that era) used to eat cams. I can still hear that dreaded "pop, pop" coming out of the carb indicting a flat lobe on the cam. I believe it wasn't bad cams, but bad lifters. The lifter would wear down, making sharp edges. Those edges would "machine" down a cam lobe in no time. Every cam I changed had lifter edges that could cut your finger. Everyone is different. Some guys like big power, others like better mileage. There is no right answer. |
04-10-2016, 01:15 PM | #53 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 877
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
Of course, for plenty of people a 200hp 305 is all they need and they're happy with it, and get better mileage. Nothing wrong with that.
__________________
1973 C20, 350/350 |
|
04-10-2016, 02:01 PM | #54 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 217
|
Re: Why's everybody hatin' on the 305?
Quote:
The highest output 305 truck engine was the 220hp, 290 lb-ft L30 Vortec engine. Now, they weren't setting the world on fire with their performance, but they were strong engines in their own right. Were I building a cruiser, there would be nothing wrong with those numbers. Were I building a "performance" vehicle, yes, I would definately replace it with something else - not because a 305 is "junk" - but because a 5.7 or a 5.3 is a better starting point in the realm of performance. It's the "baseline" to work from because years of engine building, hot-rodding and engineering have taught us all that the 350 or 325 Gen 3+ are capable of amazing performance without major modifications. Now, if you want to fly against the majority and build a reliable 500+hp 305, you would not find me in the line of people waiting to tell you "I told you so!" when it blows up. If you want to do it, it's your project, go for it! Just understanding that the 305 isn't the ideal starting point of a performance build doesn't disqualify it as a great engine.
__________________
Current Projects: 1984 GMC, LWB Fleetside, 305/350 - Currently Doing TBI Conversion 1966 GMC, SWB Stepside, 350/200-4R - Currently waiting patiently. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|