Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

PBFAB.COM · 06-03-2008, 12:38 AM

Well... the rear Dropmember for the 63-72 chassis will be available shortly. Here's a spy pic.

leftcoast66 · 06-03-2008, 12:42 AM

You outdo yourself again. Incredible work as usual, I'm excited to see the finished product.

4cefed · 06-03-2008, 12:53 AM

When and how much? And whats included in the dropmember?

SCOTI · 06-03-2008, 12:57 AM

Nice!

On a side note..... I attempted to slide the LSx into the truck tonight. Using some plates that have been scribed w/the typical 'LS to sbc' mount orientation, the drivetrain is pretty close. The 4l80e required removing more of the trans tunnel than I had hoped & I'm thinking I might need to get a f-body oil pan for better bottom end clearance for servicing entrance/exit.

It's a good thing these motors don't have distibutors @ the back of the manifold. The fit is tighter than my wallet

.....

gringoloco · 06-03-2008, 12:39 PM

Lookin' good! 'Bout time

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCOTI

Nice!

On a side note..... I attempted to slide the LSx into the truck tonight. Using some plates that have been scribed w/the typical 'LS to sbc' mount orientation, the drivetrain is pretty close. The 4l80e required removing more of the trans tunnel than I had hoped & I'm thinking I might need to get a f-body oil pan for better bottom end clearance for servicing entrance/exit.

It's a good thing these motors don't have distibutors @ the back of the manifold. The fit is tighter than my wallet

.....

So, you're using an off the shelf adapter plate instead of the PB plates? I would definitely recommend the F-body pan; from test fits in the Blazer, I would say it is a necessity.

SCOTI · 06-03-2008, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gringoloco

Lookin' good! 'Bout time

So, you're using an off the shelf adapter plate instead of the PB plates? I would definitely recommend the F-body pan; from test fits in the Blazer, I would say it is a necessity.

I have the sbc DM because that's what was installed in the truck when I made the purchase. I was looking for a 5.3/4l60e for my 74 when I ran across the 6.0/4l80e & figured it would be great for my Beater/tow vehicle. Nate & I have discussed possible options. He'll be working on something on his end & while waiting, I figured I would attack it from mine.

I made 'adapter' plates that are bolted to the LS block & prepped them for both the 'stock' sbc location as well as the 1" set back. After my initial attempt last night, the sbc holes in the plate were very close. The issue I did run into was between the height of the truck intake & the depth of the truck pans sump it was very difficult to get a confirmation that adapter plates will work.

From info I found via the net, the f-body pan is 3" more shallow vs. the truck pan. What I'm trying to confirm @ this time is specifics on the Caddy CTSv pan. It's very similar to the f-body pan dimensionally & apparently uses the same windage tray as the trucks (which means less stuff to buy/mess with).

PBFAB.COM · 06-03-2008, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCOTI

I have the sbc DM because that's what was installed in the truck when I made the purchase. I was looking for a 5.3/4l60e for my 74 when I ran across the 6.0/4l80e & figured it would be great for my Beater/tow vehicle. Nate & I have discussed possible options. He'll be working on something on his end & while waiting, I figured I would attack it from mine.

I made 'adapter' plates that are bolted to the LS block & prepped them for both the 'stock' sbc location as well as the 1" set back. After my initial attempt last night, the sbc holes in the plate were very close. The issue I did run into was between the height of the truck intake & the depth of the truck pans sump it was very difficult to get a confirmation that adapter plates will work.

From info I found via the net, the f-body pan is 3" more shallow vs. the truck pan. What I'm trying to confirm @ this time is specifics on the Caddy CTSv pan. It's very similar to the f-body pan dimensionally & apparently uses the same windage tray as the trucks (which means less stuff to buy/mess with).

You will need the F-body pan for sure... and the F-body pick-up tube. The windage tray can be salvaged with slight trimming.

gringoloco · 06-03-2008, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCOTI

I have the sbc DM because that's what was installed in the truck when I made the purchase...

That explains a lot. I was wondering if this would work- glad you're guinea pigging it for us!

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCOTI

I made 'adapter' plates that are bolted to the LS block & prepped them for both the 'stock' sbc location as well as the 1" set back. After my initial attempt last night, the sbc holes in the plate were very close. The issue I did run into was between the height of the truck intake & the depth of the truck pans sump it was very difficult to get a confirmation that adapter plates will work.

The overall height will be the same. The supplied motor mounts from PB are the same for LSX or SBC; the only difference is in where the mounting tabs are welded to the crossmember.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCOTI

From info I found via the net, the f-body pan is 3" more shallow vs. the truck pan. What I'm trying to confirm @ this time is specifics on the Caddy CTSv pan. It's very similar to the f-body pan dimensionally & apparently uses the same windage tray as the trucks (which means less stuff to buy/mess with).

The truck windage tray can be modified to work with the Camaro pan. The CTS pan may prove to be unobtanium. Though the F-body pans don't exactly grow on trees these days...

RunninLo · 06-03-2008, 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leftcoast66

You outdo yourself again. Incredible work as usual, I'm excited to see the finished product.

Not nearly as much as I am

RunninLo · 06-03-2008, 03:38 AM

hmm. that look's vaguely familiar

Josh

**lolife99** · 06-03-2008, 06:29 AM

Very Nice!

72BlckButy · 06-03-2008, 08:25 AM

Wow... maybe I need to changes the plans for my truck, or... even better, buy another one!

Nice work Nate!

jlaird · 06-03-2008, 11:28 AM

cool! what kind of link setup will come with it?

jimmydean · 06-03-2008, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlaird

cool! what kind of link setup will come with it?

It will use the stock trailing arms, IIRC.

Looks awesome, Nate.

PBFAB.COM · 06-03-2008, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmydean

It will use the stock trailing arms, IIRC.

Looks awesome, Nate.

This configuration was originally destined for trailing arms... BUT it looks like a four-link makes a lot more sense.

SCOTI · 06-03-2008, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porterbuilt

This configuration was originally destined for trailing arms... BUT it looks like a four-link makes a lot more sense.

Does this mean the final configuration is TBD?

BACKYARD88 · 06-03-2008, 11:31 AM

Looks awesome

98L150 · 06-03-2008, 12:10 PM

looks good can't wait till this is released to be ordered.

jeff

98L150 · 06-03-2008, 12:25 PM

I would imagine the rear link set up will be like the 73-87 kits Porterbuilt makes. pics of the 73-87 kit are on the attached link.

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=274729

Frizzle Fry · 06-03-2008, 02:03 PM

So it's a bolt-in notch/bridge?

PBFAB.COM · 06-03-2008, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frizzle Fry

So it's a bolt-in notch/bridge?

Frizzle-

It is a bolt-on... 100% just like the 73-87 kit. This pic is not of a finished piece. Just a teazer shot.

Nate

see ten · 06-03-2008, 04:05 PM

jkaylor68gmc · 06-03-2008, 02:39 PM

wow! nuff said

gringoloco · 06-03-2008, 04:28 PM

Since we have seriously thread-jacked you, Nate- getting back on track...

-What will be the advantages of this system over the KP setup?
-How will it compare cost-wise?
-When can we see some more pics?

Quit goofing off on the internet and get back to work on this thing!

SCOTI · 06-03-2008, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gringoloco

Since we have seriously thread-jacked you, Nate- getting back on track...

-What will be the advantages of this system over the KP setup?
-How will it compare cost-wise?
-When can we see some more pics?

Quit goofing off on the internet and get back to work on this thing!

Agreed..... My apologies Mr. Porter.

06-03-2008, 12:38 AM	#1
PBFAB.COM Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Mesa,Az Posts: 3,981	Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic Well... the rear Dropmember for the 63-72 chassis will be available shortly. Here's a spy pic. Attached Images __________________ www.PorterbuiltFabrication.com Phone: 480-297-2621 E-mail: sales@pbfab.com Find us on FaceBook under Porterbuilt Fabrication Specializing in Chassis and Suspension Components for your Classic Chevrolet Truck. We offer components from the following manufacturers: Porterbuilt Accuair Ridetech (Air Ride Technologies) Air Lift Wilwood Intro Unisteer ECE Gotta Show Air Lift Borgeson CPP Supporting this forum since 2003!

06-03-2008, 12:42 AM	#2
leftcoast66 Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Covington, WA Posts: 770	Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic You outdo yourself again. Incredible work as usual, I'm excited to see the finished product.

06-03-2008, 12:53 AM	#3
4cefed Registered User Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: washington Posts: 22	Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic When and how much? And whats included in the dropmember?

06-03-2008, 12:57 AM	#4
SCOTI Registered User Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: DALLAS,TX Posts: 22,068	Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic Nice! On a side note..... I attempted to slide the LSx into the truck tonight. Using some plates that have been scribed w/the typical 'LS to sbc' mount orientation, the drivetrain is pretty close. The 4l80e required removing more of the trans tunnel than I had hoped & I'm thinking I might need to get a f-body oil pan for better bottom end clearance for servicing entrance/exit. It's a good thing these motors don't have distibutors @ the back of the manifold. The fit is tighter than my wallet ..... __________________ 67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... *Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.*

06-03-2008, 03:38 AM	#10
RunninLo 3DrDwn--the 'burb not the band Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: missoula, mt Posts: 598	Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic hmm. that look's vaguely familiar Josh __________________ Slo and Lo that is the tempo. '72 burb build page here: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=259256 '89 GMC Dually crew build page coming soon. 88 4x4 crew DD duallys past/present pics here: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...46#post4001246 89 1 ton Dually rear flip kit install here: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=354327

06-03-2008, 06:29 AM	#11
lolife99 67-72 parts collector,… Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Mid-MO Posts: 22,700	Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic Very Nice! __________________ Keith Convert to disc brakes. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823

06-03-2008, 08:25 AM	#12
72BlckButy Tot Roddin' Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Mid-MO Posts: 24,461	Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic Wow... maybe I need to changes the plans for my truck, or... even better, buy another one! Nice work Nate! __________________ -Nate 1969 CST SWB - Project Blank Slate (4.5/6" ECE Static Drop, 6-lug disc brake upgrade (manual), Billet Specialties Vintec 20x8.5 255/40 (F) 20x10 295/40 (R), 250 I-6) 1960 AMF Skylark - Tot Roddin' (Lowered with custom frame; soon to include custom push bar and interior) 2008 Silverado CrewCab 1LT (5.3L, 3:73, 4x4, LT1, Z-71, Towing Package)

06-03-2008, 11:28 AM	#13
jlaird Senior Member Join Date: May 2004 Location: johnstown, NY Posts: 2,393	Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic cool! what kind of link setup will come with it?

06-03-2008, 11:31 AM	#17
BACKYARD88 On the fast track to nowhere.. Join Date: May 2006 Location: Splendora, Texas Posts: 5,316	Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic Looks awesome __________________ -Mike Owen- Support the board here! 71 Chevy short fleet build thread Double D Norwood, Houston, Cecilia, Jackson, Monroe and counting

06-03-2008, 12:10 PM	#18
98L150 ///Relaxed Atmosphere Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Hockley, TX Posts: 657	Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic looks good can't wait till this is released to be ordered. jeff __________________ 72 Suburban 64 Chevy short fleet 04 Chevy Colorado Sport Reg Cab 2012 Chevy Avalanche 2003 Chevy S10 Blazer Xtreme http://www.hubgarage.com/mygarage/RA_Jeff 64 Build Thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=295915

06-03-2008, 12:25 PM	#19
98L150 ///Relaxed Atmosphere Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Hockley, TX Posts: 657	Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic I would imagine the rear link set up will be like the 73-87 kits Porterbuilt makes. pics of the 73-87 kit are on the attached link. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=274729 __________________ 72 Suburban 64 Chevy short fleet 04 Chevy Colorado Sport Reg Cab 2012 Chevy Avalanche 2003 Chevy S10 Blazer Xtreme http://www.hubgarage.com/mygarage/RA_Jeff 64 Build Thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=295915

06-03-2008, 02:03 PM	#20
Frizzle Fry Registered User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Hillsboro Oregon Posts: 6,449	Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic So it's a bolt-in notch/bridge?

06-03-2008, 04:05 PM	#22
see ten WTB this ad Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Lafayette Georgia Posts: 5,074	Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic

06-03-2008, 02:39 PM	#23
jkaylor68gmc Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: TN Posts: 2,448	Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic wow! nuff said __________________ 1947 International KB-1 1957 Chevy Bel-Air riding low 1962 swb fleetside 2002 Chevrolet Silverado 7-inch lift on 35 Daily driver 2016 Chevy Tahoe Better halves ride

06-03-2008, 04:28 PM	#24
gringoloco A guy with a truck Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Germany, for now Posts: 5,921	Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic Since we have seriously thread-jacked you, Nate- getting back on track... -What will be the advantages of this system over the KP setup? -How will it compare cost-wise? -When can we see some more pics? Quit goofing off on the internet and get back to work on this thing! __________________ -Chris Instagram _elgringoloco_ '70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10 ‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd '72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD) '72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD) '05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD) ‘07 Yukon Denali (daily) Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy Last edited by gringoloco; 06-03-2008 at 04:29 PM.



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.