|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
11-18-2004, 11:59 AM
|
#1 |
|
user # 2756
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
Posts: 4,612
|
I think to have any noticable difference you'd have to have like 3.73s up front and 4.11s in the back with the same size tires. There was a truck like this in a magazine and it was strickly for mud bogging.
The reason for the slight variations between front and rears in production vehicles is probably more a function of design constraints between the different manufacturers. Really between 4.09 and 4.10 the difference is like 0.25% hardly noticable. You could have more variation between the tires than that. The only vehicle I had that the front and rears matched was a scout II with front and rear Dana44s.
__________________
1970 K25, 8' stepside bed 350/465/205 44 up front, 60 in the rear 4.10s rolling on 33" Dunlop MTs 1986 K5, 350/465/208 Dana 60/14 bolt from a cucv 36" Super Swampers TSL/SX 1983 K20 w/ CUCV axles, 350/700R4/208 sitting on 37" Goodyears 1986 M1031 6.2 diesel, TH400/NP205 locker in the rear and a LS in the front, all stock for now..... 1986 K30, 350/400/205 dana 60 and 14 bolt. I kept the drivetrain. Body/bad and chassis are gone. 1981 K30, 350/465/205 dana 60 and dually 14 bolt. Has a G80, and a flat bed. Going to replace the flat bed. 1985 K20, 350/400/208 10 bolt and SF 14 bolt. I wonder where I can find some 1 tons. Hmmmmm 
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
