The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-2005, 08:09 PM   #1
b454rat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 3,469
400 or 468??

I have a choice between these two motors. The 400 is all stock, needs some work, but will require the least amount of work to put in my suburban. The other motor is a 468 that is in my car. I want to sell my car with the motor, but no takers yet. The motor is pretty radical, alum Bowtie heads, big cam, RPM intake, 10:1 comp. If I would put it in my burban, I would change the cam to a smaller one, like the Xtreme Energy 268. Had one in another 454 in my old truck, and it worked good, and sounded good. I have the crossmember off 73-87 style, so the mounts are no biggy. I would move it forward some to clear the valvecovers and HEI. Not sure how big my radiator is, but i would probly have to get a bigger one. Bout all I would need is headers, but that isn't even a big deal, less than a $100 down to Autozone or Advance Auto. The thing is, is I want to drive this truck, it's 4wd, but not gonna take it wheeling. Don't want a racetruck, either. Gonna swap in the 4-speed soon, and I pick up my axles tomorrow. Going from D44/D60 with 4:10s to D44/12B with 3:08s. With the 468, it's in my car and ready to go. I already have the flywheel, so just need a clutch. I liked the last 400 I had in my old truck, and wanted to build this one identical to that. I'm in a toss up to which motor I want to run. The way gas is, I want the 400, but with the 468 I wouldn't really need a gas pedal, could just let the clutch out. In the long run, it will be a hauler, want to get a camper for Bloomsburg, and the weekend outings or whatever. But either motor will easily handle that. I have pics of the 468 in the pics link in my sig, and would stay like that, except for an alum water pump and the v/c's will be red. Look just the like the motor in the background in Trucks. Red block and v/c, everything else aluminum. So what would you do???
__________________
2000 GMC CCSB 454/4L80 6” lift SAS
1999 Chevy CCSB 454/NV4500 4” SAS
1999 GMC Yukon 350/4L60 6" SAS
b454rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 02:33 PM   #2
Frizzle Fry
Registered User
 
Frizzle Fry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillsboro Oregon
Posts: 6,449
Economically speaking I think the 468 will add more value to your Burb than it adds to your Malibu from a re-sell point of view. You don't see very many 60-66 trucks, let alone Burbs with BBCs. From a performance standpoint, Burbs are heavy rigs and can use all the help they can get. 400's are very capable, but if I was faced with that choice, I'd go with the 468 in the Burb.
Frizzle Fry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 05:01 PM   #3
b454rat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 3,469
I said when i first got my malibu that I would NEVER sell it, got to almost to where I want it, now i want to sell it. Go figure. I'm getting kinda tired of cars in general, everyone has one, but nobody still has a malibu, let alone one with a BBC in it. I can still find these cars around, but I've never seen a suburban like mine around here. I was in the military and got to travel alot, and the only place that I've seen some was when I was in Colorado. Like you said, I could sell the burban alot easier than the Malibu. And actually, my suburban isn't really that heavy, maybe cause I've used to my 97, which I think weighs 6500#. Hopefully I can get some pics of the process......
__________________
2000 GMC CCSB 454/4L80 6” lift SAS
1999 Chevy CCSB 454/NV4500 4” SAS
1999 GMC Yukon 350/4L60 6" SAS
b454rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2005, 01:45 AM   #4
speedking
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Elko,Nevada,USA,Earth
Posts: 78
Dude-go with the 400,and spare the rod...
Speed
__________________
-57 GMC 1/2 ton longbed,Pont. 400,4 speed
-62 Chevy 1 ton duallie,Chevy 355,4 speed
-66 Pontiac Catalina 2 dr. hardtop,389,T-400
-81 Ford Fairmont wgn.,2.3,4 speed
-68 Triumph TR6-R 'cycle,various mods
-66 C-60's back
-there's probably others...
speedking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2005, 12:09 PM   #5
toroflow
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 103
I had a 454 in my 1960 GMC Sub 4x4 and pulled it out and sold it due to the horrible gas mileage....I mean, I don't expect it to get 15 MPGs, but at 8-10 it sucked....besides, I have a 454 dually crewcab 4x4 to tow with, so it didn't make sense to keep that gas hog 454 in the Sub. I would stay as small as you can (cubic inch wise) and save your wallet at the pump!!!
__________________
Ken
'60 GMC 3/4T 4x4
'60 GMC Suburban 4x4
'64 GMC Suburban 4x4
toroflow is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com