|
06-05-2008, 01:11 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
|
Re: Air bag shocks
Derek, a 'touring' type ride qualifies for better than average dampeners. With some slight fabrication, I have Bilsteins on my 68.
When I set-up the suspension I had 2.5" drop spindles, ART arms, RE-7's, & a notched cross member. I fabricated new upper shock mounts so the shocks would be @ mid travel @ ride height (the lower mounts are in the standard location). For the rear of my 68, I have RE-6's, 2" blocks, relocated shock brackets, & a tweaked 'super' track bar. Since Bilstein doesn't make a rear shock for 67-72 coil spring applications, the choices are either use the same p/n on the rear or, use a different shock. I reasoned the front shock used in back might be too stiff so I used a rear shock for a lowered 88-98 GM. The 88-98's rear shock valving should be extremely close for other GM trucks of similar weight distribution. I had to raise the upper shock mounts (which were already raised via a home-made relocation kit) in order to get the optimum travel @ ride height. I could have dropped my lower shock mount a little more & used the upper shock crossmember in the stock location but I opted to raise the entire upper shock crossmember 3". This worked for me since I also raised my bedfloor. With the suspension under normal conditions (weight of the truck sitting in the driveway), the shocks feel great. Not too stiff, not too loose.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
Bookmarks |
|
|