The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-08-2009, 05:30 PM   #1
6772owner
Gearhead
 
6772owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,193
Air Lines

Ok fella's I did a search to try to answer my question, but didnt find anything, so here goes....

Has anyone used aluminum tubing (like the coiled fuel line stuff) for the air lines on a truck?? I have seen a lot of stainless steel hard lines done, but I wanted to do something dofferent on my C10 and thought that I could use the alum line. (Or maybe even copper, now that I think about it....) What do you guys think??? I would think it would be a nice, clean way to plumb the system without the difficulty of flaring the stainless steel lines.

Thanks for the input....
__________________
2002 Saturn SL2, My D/D
2019 Ford Fusion SE, Ecoboost - Wife's D/D
1993 Camaro Z28, A4, CAI, Cat-Back Exhaust

Project C10 (my 72' C10 w/96' LT1, 700R4, bagged F&R, 18's (for now), Short/Fleet) -- SOLD!
Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=313644
6772owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2009, 06:45 PM   #2
Tri5Nerd
Tripple Five Fanatic
 
Tri5Nerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 658
Re: Air Lines

I've seen it done with copper and stainless but never aluminum.
Maybe the pros can chime in.

Tri5
Tri5Nerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2009, 07:23 PM   #3
Shane
Account Suspended
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: over yonder
Posts: 14,270
Re: Air Lines

Without the flared ends I think you will find it difficult to get an air tight seal. I don't foresee any problems using aluminum other than that ... plus it's much easier to polish aluminum lines versus stainless steel lines.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2009, 08:14 PM   #4
jlaird
Senior Member
 
jlaird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: johnstown, NY
Posts: 2,393
Re: Air Lines

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane View Post
Without the flared ends I think you will find it difficult to get an air tight seal. I don't foresee any problems using aluminum other than that ... plus it's much easier to polish aluminum lines versus stainless steel lines.
Stainless doesn't need to be polished. That's the beauty of it. Yes, you can use aluminum with AN fittings. Bentfab (I think that's his user name) can hook you up with Redhorse AN fittings.
jlaird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2009, 08:19 PM   #5
Twisted Minis
Registered User
 
Twisted Minis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Windsor, CA
Posts: 500
Re: Air Lines

I've done it before with aluminum lines from the parts store that was rated at 300 PSI. I use some stainless fittings on it from Summit that use a double flare like a brake line.
__________________
If you can find it cheaper, I can fix it!
Twisted Minis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2009, 08:31 PM   #6
Shane
Account Suspended
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: over yonder
Posts: 14,270
Re: Air Lines

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlaird View Post
Stainless doesn't need to be polished. That's the beauty of it. Yes, you can use aluminum with AN fittings. Bentfab (I think that's his user name) can hook you up with Redhorse AN fittings.
After polishing more than a few 50 foot roll of 3/8" stainless trust me when I tell you that if you want stainless to shine then it has to be polished.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2009, 08:42 PM   #7
jlaird
Senior Member
 
jlaird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: johnstown, NY
Posts: 2,393
Re: Air Lines

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane View Post
After polishing more than a few 50 foot roll of 3/8" stainless trust me when I tell you that if you want stainless to shine then it has to be polished.
not the stainless from inline tube or swagelok. There's different stuff out there.
jlaird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2009, 09:35 PM   #8
Shane
Account Suspended
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: over yonder
Posts: 14,270
Re: Air Lines

Again, that depends entirely on the grade of stainless you buy and the finish you specify.

I know Swagelok all too well ... I worked for their number 1 competitor for over 10 years at a facility that specialized in 304, 316, & 316L stainless fittings and tubing.

Last edited by Shane; 05-08-2009 at 09:42 PM.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2009, 10:20 PM   #9
fixit-p
Registered User
 
fixit-p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Yay Area CA
Posts: 2,329
Re: Air Lines

I've worked on some older heavy trucks and the plumbing for the airbrakes back then were mostly all copper tubing with compresion fittings. A common problem was when the tubing was attached to something that wasn't ridgid or loose the tube would crack at the compression sleeve or flare from the vibration.
fixit-p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2009, 12:11 PM   #10
6772owner
Gearhead
 
6772owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,193
Re: Air Lines

Thanks for the reponses guys, I guess I should have specified, I planned on using AN fittings and doing at least a single flare. (I just did that with all the fuel lines for my LT1 swap) I was worried, however, about the cracking issue. I thought that if the bags were frame mounted, and the tanks are frame mounted, I wouldnt really have a problem with that. I dont know that I was worried about polishing it so much, I will daily drive this one in Colorado LOL
__________________
2002 Saturn SL2, My D/D
2019 Ford Fusion SE, Ecoboost - Wife's D/D
1993 Camaro Z28, A4, CAI, Cat-Back Exhaust

Project C10 (my 72' C10 w/96' LT1, 700R4, bagged F&R, 18's (for now), Short/Fleet) -- SOLD!
Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=313644

Last edited by 6772owner; 05-09-2009 at 12:13 PM. Reason: text
6772owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2009, 09:50 PM   #11
Shane
Account Suspended
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: over yonder
Posts: 14,270
Re: Air Lines

if it's a daily driver and not a show truck then I would just go with the DOT plastic/teflon tubing ...
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2009, 10:25 PM   #12
NZSquare
Registered User
 
NZSquare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Queenstown
Posts: 132
Re: Air Lines

Ive never used these fittings on trucks but Im a helicopter mechanic so have used them plenty there. Generally with an AN type flare and aluminium tube we would use on lower pressure systems , up to 1500 PSI .Anything above that is stainless, so for a max of 600 in a truck youd be fine. FLares dont crack and are super reliable if they are formed properly, polished (just the flare) and not over tightened. There are also the MS type unions which are flareless and self-foming, either works good, the MS ones may be harder to get commercially. Make sure when you start flaring them the angle of the flaring tool is right, I think aircraft AN fittings are 37 degrees.
There are also a few different tempers of tubing, I think the only thing that would concern you is getting the O-state or annealed stuff if its ex-aircraft stock (like from boeing surplus or something) its designed to be tempered after froming and wont hold pressure if it aint.

Ill end up doing the same for my truck as they are alot cleaner.

Hope this helps
NZSquare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 09:54 AM   #13
6772owner
Gearhead
 
6772owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,193
Re: Air Lines

Shane,
I agree, I am debating whether it is even worth the trouble or not. I wish I could say it was for show, but I need to use this truck so its purely function for the most part. (Not that i dont try to have it look good too)

NZSquare,
Thanks for the insight, I was hoping that it would be able to hold 300 psi or so (and I really doubt I will ever even see that much pressure with my planned set up) Also in my experience I havent been able to find a flaring tool that is made for 37 degree flares???? I had to use a regualr flaring tool and just trial fit the double flare to an actual fitting. Any advice on finding a dedicated 37 degree flaring tool?
__________________
2002 Saturn SL2, My D/D
2019 Ford Fusion SE, Ecoboost - Wife's D/D
1993 Camaro Z28, A4, CAI, Cat-Back Exhaust

Project C10 (my 72' C10 w/96' LT1, 700R4, bagged F&R, 18's (for now), Short/Fleet) -- SOLD!
Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=313644
6772owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 11:35 AM   #14
fixit-p
Registered User
 
fixit-p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Yay Area CA
Posts: 2,329
Re: Air Lines

Here's where I get my flaring tools item B would probably do it for you I have items L and M the quality is excellent and it's branded by Imperial
http://www.mcmaster.com/#flaring-tools/=1ttyim

Last edited by fixit-p; 05-11-2009 at 11:36 AM. Reason: link
fixit-p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 05:34 PM   #15
NZSquare
Registered User
 
NZSquare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Queenstown
Posts: 132
Re: Air Lines

I dug up a 'Standard aircraft handbook" circa 1792 and it says an Aircraft AN flare tool produces a 35-37 degree flare and automotive tools form a 45 and wont work with AN fittings.
That said the AN name is used thoughout the aftermarket auto industry so either auto parts have gone to 37 for AN or theres an AN for aircraft and an AN for vehicles, I guess youd have to make a 37 degree gauge and have a hunt. It entirely depends on what the angle of the unions yourre using are.
The aircraft AN flares are a single flare so much easier to do and get right the first time, and the tubing comes in straight 5 metre lengths so its easier to form and have looking nice instead of uncoiling the stuff and trying to straighten it.
NZSquare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 05:43 PM   #16
NZSquare
Registered User
 
NZSquare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Queenstown
Posts: 132
Re: Air Lines

there you go, the link that last guy posted says the tools will produce a 37 or 45 degree flare, so Bobs your mothers brother. All you can do is try it and see.
NZSquare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 06:37 PM   #17
fixit-p
Registered User
 
fixit-p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Yay Area CA
Posts: 2,329
Re: Air Lines

here's an economical one from Summit http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...&autoview=prod
I work with JIC fittings (hydraulic) which is the same as AN fittings 37* basically just fewer dash sizes and different matl. the 45 degree fittings are SAE fittings are used on low pressure lines (air brake, trans oil and diesel).
fixit-p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 06:47 PM   #18
jlaird
Senior Member
 
jlaird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: johnstown, NY
Posts: 2,393
Re: Air Lines

Those other tools will work on regular steel, but if you use stainless, this is the tool you want

http://www.toolup.com/ridgid/41162.html
jlaird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 09:40 PM   #19
6772owner
Gearhead
 
6772owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,193
Re: Air Lines

Cool thank you to everyone for the help, I will check into this more and let you know what I figure when my bags get here and I dive in.
__________________
2002 Saturn SL2, My D/D
2019 Ford Fusion SE, Ecoboost - Wife's D/D
1993 Camaro Z28, A4, CAI, Cat-Back Exhaust

Project C10 (my 72' C10 w/96' LT1, 700R4, bagged F&R, 18's (for now), Short/Fleet) -- SOLD!
Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=313644
6772owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 09:58 PM   #20
bentfab
Registered User
 
bentfab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: chatsworth california
Posts: 79
Re: Air Lines

Hey guy's check out my web site. It will give you a ton of pics and ideas. Also check out the media section it will give alot of the answers your looking for and also I sell alot of the product your looking for minus the tools. Any questions feel free to call.
bentfab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 11:16 AM   #21
6772owner
Gearhead
 
6772owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,193
Re: Air Lines

Thanks for the info, I forgot about you LOL
__________________
2002 Saturn SL2, My D/D
2019 Ford Fusion SE, Ecoboost - Wife's D/D
1993 Camaro Z28, A4, CAI, Cat-Back Exhaust

Project C10 (my 72' C10 w/96' LT1, 700R4, bagged F&R, 18's (for now), Short/Fleet) -- SOLD!
Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=313644
6772owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 03:55 PM   #22
XXL
Seņor Member
 
XXL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
Re: Air Lines

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZSquare View Post
I dug up a 'Standard aircraft handbook" circa 1792...
Is this the one the Wright Brothers' used during their early 20th century experiments in flight?
XXL is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com