Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-12-2009, 10:01 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
|
True Duals vs Crossover
what are the pro's and cons of each. wats the real difference?
__________________
1972 longbed- 454 1967 shortbed- 355 |
05-12-2009, 10:10 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: lacrosse wi.
Posts: 426
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
from my research here and other places an h or x crossover will provide more low end torque. the x pipe is a little harder to instal but provides a little better scavenging than the h pipe. basicly what is happening is you are combining both sides of the engine so when one cylinder is exhausting its pressure wave will be passing thru the x as another cylinder on the other bank is just starting to exhaust. pulling that cylinders exhaust along with it. thus creating "vacume" or suction in the overlap between exhaust and intake in the cylinder.
|
05-12-2009, 10:11 AM | #3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
Quote:
__________________
1972 longbed- 454 1967 shortbed- 355 |
|
05-12-2009, 10:14 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: K.C. Missouri
Posts: 1,024
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
On a 2800 pound drag car, a little. On your engine in your heavy truck, nothing but cost.
Do yourself a favor and put the cheapest, decent exaust you can on it. And bigger is not better. A small displacement, relatively mild engine needs backpressure to run efficiantly, Your airflow issues will originate in the heads, not the exaust. Now if you plan on stepping up to ported polished Edelbrocks, or Dart heads, with a high lift cam, heavy springs, stroker crank Blah,Blah,Blah, then you can worry about the exaust. |
05-12-2009, 11:54 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Urbana,Ohio,USA
Posts: 4,618
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
Quote:
what he said.
__________________
2008 Chevy HHR 1/2 panel. 1949 Chevy Panel truck(just sittin, waiting) Board member #6 |
|
05-12-2009, 04:50 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: weatherford,texas
Posts: 1,003
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
the x or h pipe will help will noise( popping).makes a smoother melow sound. it can still be loud just not as much popping. that's why i run an h pipe on my trucks.
|
05-12-2009, 04:57 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: independence mo
Posts: 2,111
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
|
05-12-2009, 05:07 PM | #8 | |
*************
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 17,862
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
Quote:
__________________
Rob - https://www.instagram.com/hart_rod_c10 As Iron Sharpens Iron, So One Man Sharpens Another. Proverbs 27:17 FOR SALE: DBW pedal bracket - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=651123 FOR SALE: Hood Brackets http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=679945 1987 Silverado SWB - 34.5K original miles http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=801834 1969 SuperBurb - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=200387 1968 Farm truck - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=358692 1968 SWB - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=551258 1948 Chevy - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=122164&page=3 |
|
05-12-2009, 07:34 PM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: K.C. Missouri
Posts: 1,024
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
Quote:
I think of it like this, put a spitball ( small ball of paper soaked in spit )in a coffee stirrer, you cannot blow it out,just sticks in there. now put it in a piece off one inch pipe, same thing the spitball sits there or barely moves as you blow, Now get a softdrink straw, blow and watch it fly across th room and stick on the wall!!! You have an efficient way of moving it. Size is very important not too big , not to small. |
|
05-12-2009, 07:50 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: S.E. South Dakota
Posts: 161
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
I am restoring a 71 pickup and trying to keep it as original as possible. I think the 350 4-wheel drives came with single exhaust. Does anyone know if that is correct and if it would be a mistake to put single instead of duals on it? Thanks
|
05-12-2009, 08:27 PM | #11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 448
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
Quote:
__________________
1978 GMC Jimmy 454bbc Turbo400 NP205 3.73 gears 4inch lift 33's |
|
05-12-2009, 09:54 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sherwood Oregon
Posts: 1,908
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
I added the X to mine and the sound got so much better, not really more quiet just smoother
|
05-12-2009, 10:03 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
here are my flowmasters:
__________________
1972 longbed- 454 1967 shortbed- 355 |
05-13-2009, 06:22 AM | #14 | |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
Quote:
A system that runs one pipe from each cylinder back that run seperately to their exits,with or w/o a crossover,is a true dual system.What wouldn`t be a true dual system would be one that at some point runs into a single pipe and then back into two.Or on an inline,starting as a single then splitting into two.A true dual system on an inline would be a split header with 1/2 the ports into one pipe and the other 1/2 into the other. I`ve never run crossovers and never knew I was missing anything.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
|
05-13-2009, 07:16 AM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Center City, MN, USA
Posts: 3,254
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
To further the discussion, you may want to consider leaving your factory exhaust manifolds on. Headers may hurt the scavenging effect of the exhaust flow. (Once again unless you plan on stepping up to ported polished Edelbrocks, or Dart heads, with a high lift cam, heavy springs, stroker crank Blah,Blah,Blah)
If you must run headers, wrap the heck out of them to keep the heat in there. The Heartthrob Exhaust dual kit sold through LMC is a good bang for the buck, low cost system and it bolts right to your factory manifolds. Google Heartthrob Exhaust for more info. The LMC kit is drop shipped right from Heartthrob - at least it was when I bought my exhaust.
__________________
'70 cab, '71 chassis, 383, TH350, NP205. '71 Malibu convertible '72 Malibu hard top Center City, MN |
05-13-2009, 01:10 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 252
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
i just love the sound of a crossover compared to "true" duals. Not louder, just deeper and smoother...perfect
__________________
-Scott- 1970 C10 shortbed 396 1969 C30 dually flatbed "Vidalia" |
05-13-2009, 01:34 PM | #17 | |
20' Daredevil (Ret)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jefferson State
Posts: 13,749
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
Quote:
Exhaust gas velocity is the key, which is why size matters. And that's also why headers should be wrapped to retain heat -- a decrease in heat causes the gases to slow down.
__________________
- Mike - 1972 K20 LWB 350/350/205 RIP El Jay |
|
05-13-2009, 01:54 PM | #18 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
Quote:
__________________
1972 longbed- 454 1967 shortbed- 355 |
|
05-13-2009, 03:36 PM | #19 |
20' Daredevil (Ret)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jefferson State
Posts: 13,749
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
Understood. In that case, don't even worry about what works best -- just go with whatever shows best!
__________________
- Mike - 1972 K20 LWB 350/350/205 RIP El Jay |
05-13-2009, 04:02 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Center KS
Posts: 3,525
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
Hot rod magazine did a story a few years ago comparing open headers vs "true" dual vs an H-pipe vs. an X-pipe.
Basically the open headers made the most power but lost a lot of low end torque. The X-pipe setup had almost the same peak horsepower, but had a lot more low end torque. I'm running an X-pipe on my truck. |
05-13-2009, 04:30 PM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: independence mo
Posts: 2,111
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
buy ceramic coated headers they don't put off much more heat than factory manifolds.
|
05-13-2009, 05:35 PM | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
right now im running corvette stock manifolds, ceramic headers are out of my budget. have about 6 bucks left.
__________________
1972 longbed- 454 1967 shortbed- 355 |
05-13-2009, 06:07 PM | #23 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: independence mo
Posts: 2,111
|
Re: True Duals vs Crossover
You can get a nice set of hedmens for less than $300.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|