The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2009, 10:01 AM   #1
ZombieWeinerDog
Registered User
 
ZombieWeinerDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
True Duals vs Crossover

what are the pro's and cons of each. wats the real difference?
__________________
1972 longbed- 454
1967 shortbed- 355
ZombieWeinerDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 10:10 AM   #2
lax54650
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: lacrosse wi.
Posts: 426
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

from my research here and other places an h or x crossover will provide more low end torque. the x pipe is a little harder to instal but provides a little better scavenging than the h pipe. basicly what is happening is you are combining both sides of the engine so when one cylinder is exhausting its pressure wave will be passing thru the x as another cylinder on the other bank is just starting to exhaust. pulling that cylinders exhaust along with it. thus creating "vacume" or suction in the overlap between exhaust and intake in the cylinder.
lax54650 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 10:11 AM   #3
ZombieWeinerDog
Registered User
 
ZombieWeinerDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

Quote:
Originally Posted by lax54650 View Post
from my research here and other places an h or x crossover will provide more low end torque. the x pipe is a little harder to instal but provides a little better scavenging than the h pipe. basicly what is happening is you are combining both sides of the engine so when one cylinder is exhausting its pressure wave will be passing thru the x as another cylinder on the other bank is just starting to exhaust. pulling that cylinders exhaust along with it. thus creating "vacume" or suction in the overlap between exhaust and intake in the cylinder.
thanks for the info
__________________
1972 longbed- 454
1967 shortbed- 355
ZombieWeinerDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 10:14 AM   #4
Skirkpat
Registered User
 
Skirkpat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: K.C. Missouri
Posts: 1,024
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

On a 2800 pound drag car, a little. On your engine in your heavy truck, nothing but cost.

Do yourself a favor and put the cheapest, decent exaust you can on it. And bigger is not better. A small displacement, relatively mild engine needs backpressure to run efficiantly, Your airflow issues will originate in the heads, not the exaust. Now if you plan on stepping up to ported polished Edelbrocks, or Dart heads, with a high lift cam, heavy springs, stroker crank Blah,Blah,Blah, then you can worry about the exaust.
Skirkpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 11:54 AM   #5
fine69
Senior Member

 
fine69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Urbana,Ohio,USA
Posts: 4,618
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skirkpat View Post
On a 2800 pound drag car, a little. On your engine in your heavy truck, nothing but cost.

Do yourself a favor and put the cheapest, decent exaust you can on it. And bigger is not better. A small displacement, relatively mild engine needs backpressure to run efficiantly, Your airflow issues will originate in the heads, not the exaust. Now if you plan on stepping up to ported polished Edelbrocks, or Dart heads, with a high lift cam, heavy springs, stroker crank Blah,Blah,Blah, then you can worry about the exaust.
^
what he said.
__________________
2008 Chevy HHR 1/2 panel.
1949 Chevy Panel truck(just sittin, waiting)

Board member #6

fine69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 04:50 PM   #6
lilred67
Senior Member
 
lilred67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: weatherford,texas
Posts: 1,003
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

the x or h pipe will help will noise( popping).makes a smoother melow sound. it can still be loud just not as much popping. that's why i run an h pipe on my trucks.
lilred67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 04:57 PM   #7
big mike71
Registered User
 
big mike71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: independence mo
Posts: 2,111
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

Quote:
Originally Posted by lilred67 View Post
the x or h pipe will help will noise( popping).makes a smoother melow sound. it can still be loud just not as much popping. that's why i run an h pipe on my trucks.
That's how I ran mine
big mike71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 05:07 PM   #8
Hart_Rod
*************
 
Hart_Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 17,862
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skirkpat View Post
On a 2800 pound drag car, a little. On your engine in your heavy truck, nothing but cost.

Do yourself a favor and put the cheapest, decent exaust you can on it. And bigger is not better. A small displacement, relatively mild engine needs backpressure to run efficiantly, Your airflow issues will originate in the heads, not the exaust. Now if you plan on stepping up to ported polished Edelbrocks, or Dart heads, with a high lift cam, heavy springs, stroker crank Blah,Blah,Blah, then you can worry about the exaust.
Does this apply to newer engines? I've got a 5.3 with a supercharger.
Hart_Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 07:34 PM   #9
Skirkpat
Registered User
 
Skirkpat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: K.C. Missouri
Posts: 1,024
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hart_Rod View Post
Does this apply to newer engines? I've got a 5.3 with a supercharger.
The newer LS heads flow MUCH better than the old SBC heads. Add some forced induction and you probably would gain power with a larger/modified exaust system, and low end torque with a croosover of some type. Alot of people believe that the bgger your exaust, the faster you get air out, this is true to a certain point,eventually you get to a point where you lose enough volocity that it starts to hurt performance.

I think of it like this, put a spitball ( small ball of paper soaked in spit )in a coffee stirrer, you cannot blow it out,just sticks in there.

now put it in a piece off one inch pipe, same thing the spitball sits there or barely moves as you blow,

Now get a softdrink straw, blow and watch it fly across th room and stick on the wall!!! You have an efficient way of moving it. Size is very important not too big , not to small.
Skirkpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 07:50 PM   #10
69 COPO
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: S.E. South Dakota
Posts: 161
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

I am restoring a 71 pickup and trying to keep it as original as possible. I think the 350 4-wheel drives came with single exhaust. Does anyone know if that is correct and if it would be a mistake to put single instead of duals on it? Thanks
69 COPO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 08:27 PM   #11
Hoffman65burb
Registered User
 
Hoffman65burb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 448
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skirkpat View Post
I think of it like this, put a spitball ( small ball of paper soaked in spit )in a coffee stirrer, you cannot blow it out,just sticks in there.

now put it in a piece off one inch pipe, same thing the spitball sits there or barely moves as you blow,

Now get a softdrink straw, blow and watch it fly across th room and stick on the wall!!! You have an efficient way of moving it. Size is very important not too big , not to small.
Thats an awsome way to explain it
__________________
1978 GMC Jimmy
454bbc
Turbo400
NP205
3.73 gears
4inch lift
33's
Hoffman65burb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 09:54 PM   #12
LuckyHenriksen
Registered User
 
LuckyHenriksen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sherwood Oregon
Posts: 1,908
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

I added the X to mine and the sound got so much better, not really more quiet just smoother
__________________
1968 Yenko Chevy LWB
6.0L/TH400
3/4 Drop
Senior Project
Build Thread Here
LuckyHenriksen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 10:03 PM   #13
ZombieWeinerDog
Registered User
 
ZombieWeinerDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

here are my flowmasters:
__________________
1972 longbed- 454
1967 shortbed- 355
ZombieWeinerDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 06:22 AM   #14
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69 COPO View Post
I am restoring a 71 pickup and trying to keep it as original as possible. I think the 350 4-wheel drives came with single exhaust. Does anyone know if that is correct and if it would be a mistake to put single instead of duals on it? Thanks
Yes,only big block trucks came with dual factory exhaust.But,I like duals exhaust with V-design motoes...just makes sense to me.One pipe per bank.

A system that runs one pipe from each cylinder back that run seperately to their exits,with or w/o a crossover,is a true dual system.What wouldn`t be a true dual system would be one that at some point runs into a single pipe and then back into two.Or on an inline,starting as a single then splitting into two.A true dual system on an inline would be a split header with 1/2 the ports into one pipe and the other 1/2 into the other.
I`ve never run crossovers and never knew I was missing anything.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 07:16 AM   #15
mrein3
Registered User
 
mrein3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Center City, MN, USA
Posts: 3,254
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

To further the discussion, you may want to consider leaving your factory exhaust manifolds on. Headers may hurt the scavenging effect of the exhaust flow. (Once again unless you plan on stepping up to ported polished Edelbrocks, or Dart heads, with a high lift cam, heavy springs, stroker crank Blah,Blah,Blah)

If you must run headers, wrap the heck out of them to keep the heat in there.

The Heartthrob Exhaust dual kit sold through LMC is a good bang for the buck, low cost system and it bolts right to your factory manifolds. Google Heartthrob Exhaust for more info. The LMC kit is drop shipped right from Heartthrob - at least it was when I bought my exhaust.
__________________
'70 cab, '71 chassis, 383, TH350, NP205.
'71 Malibu convertible
'72 Malibu hard top
Center City, MN
mrein3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 01:10 PM   #16
Texasbigblock
Registered User
 
Texasbigblock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 252
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

i just love the sound of a crossover compared to "true" duals. Not louder, just deeper and smoother...perfect
__________________
-Scott-
1970 C10 shortbed 396
1969 C30 dually flatbed "Vidalia"
Texasbigblock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 01:34 PM   #17
Stocker
20' Daredevil (Ret)
 
Stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jefferson State
Posts: 13,749
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skirkpat View Post
Alot of people believe that the bgger your exaust, the faster you get air out, this is true to a certain point,eventually you get to a point where you lose enough volocity that it starts to hurt performance.

Size is very important not too big , not to small.
This pretty well sums it up -- and the reason size is important has to do with velocity, not backpressure. Engines don't require backpressure to run well (try breathing through that straw), but all components need to be designed to work together.

Exhaust gas velocity is the key, which is why size matters. And that's also why headers should be wrapped to retain heat -- a decrease in heat causes the gases to slow down.
__________________
- Mike -

1972 K20 LWB 350/350/205

RIP El Jay
Stocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 01:54 PM   #18
ZombieWeinerDog
Registered User
 
ZombieWeinerDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stocker View Post
This pretty well sums it up -- and the reason size is important has to do with velocity, not backpressure. Engines don't require backpressure to run well (try breathing through that straw), but all components need to be designed to work together.

Exhaust gas velocity is the key, which is why size matters. And that's also why headers should be wrapped to retain heat -- a decrease in heat causes the gases to slow down.
Npt happening, its a show truck, looks bad
__________________
1972 longbed- 454
1967 shortbed- 355
ZombieWeinerDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 03:36 PM   #19
Stocker
20' Daredevil (Ret)
 
Stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jefferson State
Posts: 13,749
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

Understood. In that case, don't even worry about what works best -- just go with whatever shows best!
__________________
- Mike -

1972 K20 LWB 350/350/205

RIP El Jay
Stocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 04:02 PM   #20
Ackattack
Senior Member
 
Ackattack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Center KS
Posts: 3,525
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

Hot rod magazine did a story a few years ago comparing open headers vs "true" dual vs an H-pipe vs. an X-pipe.

Basically the open headers made the most power but lost a lot of low end torque.

The X-pipe setup had almost the same peak horsepower, but had a lot more low end torque.

I'm running an X-pipe on my truck.
Ackattack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 04:30 PM   #21
big mike71
Registered User
 
big mike71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: independence mo
Posts: 2,111
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

buy ceramic coated headers they don't put off much more heat than factory manifolds.
big mike71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 05:35 PM   #22
ZombieWeinerDog
Registered User
 
ZombieWeinerDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

Quote:
Originally Posted by big mike71 View Post
buy ceramic coated headers they don't put off much more heat than factory manifolds.
right now im running corvette stock manifolds, ceramic headers are out of my budget. have about 6 bucks left.
__________________
1972 longbed- 454
1967 shortbed- 355
ZombieWeinerDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 06:07 PM   #23
big mike71
Registered User
 
big mike71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: independence mo
Posts: 2,111
Re: True Duals vs Crossover

You can get a nice set of hedmens for less than $300.
Attached Images
 
big mike71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com