![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 100
|
350 vs 454 - economics
I have a 350 and a 454. I have to pick one for my 71 GMC.
The 350 is in the truck and working, the 454 needs some machine work. What should I be expecting for rebuild costs and gas milage? Looking for good performance and good city cruising, as a mostly street motor (might see the strip once or twice) Trying to figure out what I should budget for this. Any thoughts or opinions appreciated.
__________________
-- Tall, Dark and Handsome... Or so my mother says ![]() -- There is no fate, but the fate we make. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,270
|
Re: 350 vs 454 - economics
Depending on the level of performance, I'd say $1,000 os so for a mostly stock build up to about $1500 for a stroker kit and then 6-800 in machine work for the 454 (stroked and poked it would net you a 496!). Honestly and I am biased, I love me some "BIG IRON" but not everyone does. The 454 will pull 10-12 mpg and maybe more if an OD trans is put behind it, but a BBC will never be outclassed by a SBC I mean mash the gas and the torq plants you in your seat, it takes a nasty SBC to do that!!
Last edited by 70rs/ss; 05-15-2009 at 01:12 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Active Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atwater, CA
Posts: 259
|
Re: 350 vs 454 - economics
1000-1500 for a rebuild? I would think it would be atleast that, with just the short block rebuild and machine work, and once you've poked and stroked it, won't better heads be required. Only rebuilt one engine in highschool (350) and so I don't really know, but aren't heads for a BBC in that price range alone?
Whose rebuild kits do you use? What heads would you suggest? Thanks,
__________________
Kevin 72 Chevelle 67 C10...454/TH400 Build Thread:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=193961 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
I built it
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bakersfield ca
Posts: 744
|
Re: 350 vs 454 - economics
![]() ment to be under: 70rs/ss's post
__________________
'72 k10 lwb 454, th400, 205, d44ft, 12b rear, 4in skyjacker, 35x12.5-15 superswampers, 4.56, blazer tank. painless wiring harness '98 dodge 3500 12v 5sp 4x4. the truck that actually runs Last edited by 72chevyk10; 05-15-2009 at 01:46 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,270
|
Re: 350 vs 454 - economics
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,270
|
Re: 350 vs 454 - economics
https://shop.enginekits.com/osb/itemdetails.cfm?ID=431
Master kit and the stoker is! https://shop.enginekits.com/osb/itemdetails.cfm?ID=2575 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Formerly- 1972SuperCheyenne
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wake Forest NC
Posts: 5,782
|
Re: 350 vs 454 - economics
BBC all the way man. LOVE them
__________________
--Josh My Build Thread:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=799218 A good crossthread is better than Loctite any day. Life is not about what you have, but who you have to share it with. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,079
|
Re: 350 vs 454 - economics
454
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
-- Josh Instagram: @americanmusc1e OLD SKOOL-- 1970 C10. 454/Th400/3.07 posi Build Thread FARM TRUCK----1949 Chevrolet 3800 Power Wagon Hauler Build Thread 1999 4wd OBS Tahoe - daily. DM me if you can't see photos i posted |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
I am a Referee of life.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Greensboro N.C.
Posts: 13,992
|
Re: 350 vs 454 - economics
I think you have gotten biased opinions.Everyone loves a BBC.The real test of what is right for you is use.If you are going to be Daily Driving it then a BBC will cost a bit more to feed.If it's a weekend toy a BBC is the way to go.If you need to drive it everywhere you go I think a stroker smallblock may be a good choice.The SBC will not have the pure torque but can be plenty healthy while costing somewhat less to feed.
If fuel cost is no object go with a stroked BBC and have fun.
__________________
The 47-present Chevrolet and GMC Truck Message Board Network,it's owners,moderators,members,and associates of any type should not be held responsible for my opinion. You can't fix stupid,not even with duct tape. "My appearance is due to the fact that "GOD" does punish you for having too much fun!" Barrett-Jackson has perfected alchemy,they make rust into gold! "You can lead a horse to water but you can't saddle a duck" "Cleverly disguised as a 'Responsible Adult' "Sometimes your Knight in shining armor is just a retard in tinfoil" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
I built it
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bakersfield ca
Posts: 744
|
Re: 350 vs 454 - economics
actually my bbc gets beter milage then any sbc ive ever run. and quite a bit more power
__________________
'72 k10 lwb 454, th400, 205, d44ft, 12b rear, 4in skyjacker, 35x12.5-15 superswampers, 4.56, blazer tank. painless wiring harness '98 dodge 3500 12v 5sp 4x4. the truck that actually runs |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 100
|
Re: 350 vs 454 - economics
Well I definately think I'm going for the 454. I road in my buddies 496 Chevelle and I feel inspired.
__________________
-- Tall, Dark and Handsome... Or so my mother says ![]() -- There is no fate, but the fate we make. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
I built it
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bakersfield ca
Posts: 744
|
Re: 350 vs 454 - economics
good choice
![]() ![]()
__________________
'72 k10 lwb 454, th400, 205, d44ft, 12b rear, 4in skyjacker, 35x12.5-15 superswampers, 4.56, blazer tank. painless wiring harness '98 dodge 3500 12v 5sp 4x4. the truck that actually runs |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|