Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-29-2009, 01:23 AM | #1 |
Texas Big Wig
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mineola, Texas
Posts: 5,620
|
Rear suspension... thinking out loud
Hey guys, just thinking of some stuff I may want to do on a project I may start
It would be an 88-98 SWB And if I bag it, I was curious about how I may do the rear suspension Got to thinking & thought maybe make some trailing arms like the 67-72 has, but run them parallel instead of triangular With that you would need a fairly hefty system to keep the rear from moving side to side, so I was thinking of building a watts link I would want the arms to be fairly long to keep the axle arc down to a minimum through its travel & mount the bags forward a lil bit from where the 67-72 springs are, to have a lil better ride Are there any pros or cons to this ??? Does anyone have specs on what it takes to build a watts link ??? I would be making everything from scratch, as Im low on cash flow Thanks, Matt Here is a rough lil drawing of what Im talking about Last edited by Spray-Bomb; 08-29-2009 at 01:56 AM. |
08-29-2009, 08:40 AM | #2 |
67-72 parts collector,…
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,700
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
That's your basic 2-link,... with yours having "a fairly long arms".
Pinion angle change, thru the suspension travel,... will still be a concern. Not trying to discourage you,... but to me,... low cash flow and bags do not go together. I'd bag the front and flip kit the rear,... until you have the funds for a nice 4-link (much better ride) or 3-link for the rear. You can go as low as 7" in the rear with a flip kit and shackle. Sorry if this wasn't much help,... but I'm not a fan of the 2-link.
__________________
Keith Convert to disc brakes. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823 |
08-29-2009, 09:41 AM | #3 |
It'd be alot cooler if you did
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Three Rivers, MI
Posts: 2,345
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
No point glorifying a basic two link. |
08-29-2009, 02:55 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: kissimmee Florida
Posts: 494
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
You want to do just what I started to do . I'm building that same system for my 56. I built brackets to mount 32" long trailing arms . I hope to have the arms done tonight. Spent the day stripping off the leaf springs and mounting the blocks.The only change I'm making is I'm doing a triangleated bracket to mount to the diff and crossmember. I have about 30.00 in it so far. I'll take some pics.
|
08-29-2009, 06:08 PM | #5 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: over yonder
Posts: 14,270
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
Why reinvent the wheel?
|
08-29-2009, 06:19 PM | #6 |
Happy to be here
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
That looks very similiar to what Ekstensive metalworks uses. They have a two link that uses square tube and mounts in the stock front spring hanger.
I believe their system uses a panhard bar. Why would you want a Watts link to complicate things?
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" |
08-29-2009, 07:09 PM | #7 | |
Texas Big Wig
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mineola, Texas
Posts: 5,620
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
Quote:
Im not bent on a watts link, but I was just trying to keep side to side movement down to a minimum do to clearances As for the rest of yall, I wasnt asking if it was a bad idea or even what you would do different, just what the pros & cons were So far I have gathered that there is still the issue of pinion angle change during the range of motion, which I was already aware of do to owning several 67-72s |
|
08-29-2009, 07:57 PM | #8 |
Happy to be here
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
If it were me, and just wanted something not so common (yet) I would consider the lower parallel bars and use the existing leaf spring mounts "if" that gives you a long enough bar.
For the top I would go with a wishbone. If there is enough width between the rails to get enough degree to control sway, this might offer a clean set up. I'm just not a big fan of the aesthetics of a Watt's link. I think they add a lot of clutter in an area that usually has to much going on already.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" |
08-29-2009, 09:35 PM | #9 |
Texas Big Wig
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mineola, Texas
Posts: 5,620
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
I have seen people use the front spring mounts for their bars, but I dont know how much pinion movement they experience
As for the wishbone, how well do they control sway ??? I have never used one, or read much on them Thanks, Matt |
08-29-2009, 09:41 PM | #10 |
Happy to be here
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
There's some ideas in the built ByBrooks thread here- LINK
Also search forum member :Twisted Minis". I believe he has some pics posted as well.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" |
08-29-2009, 09:59 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: kissimmee Florida
Posts: 494
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
I was at first thinking about the front spring hangers but you would have to either mount your piviot on top of the trailing arms or carve out the stock spring hanger. Of course if your not bagging it then it might work I myself am setting up for bags
|
08-30-2009, 01:24 AM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: yuma arizona
Posts: 448
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
a two link with a trac bar is a really easy way to go and would be cheaper. you set your pinion angle to your ride height and you really wont have a problem.. a watts link stays center during max drop/lift.
.. some people dont like two links but if you dont want a side to side air set up and if your looking for the least amount of sway, i would say two link with track bar. the trac bar link to link make your set up triangulated and acts as a really big sway bar Last edited by bedsled71; 08-30-2009 at 01:29 AM. |
08-30-2009, 01:32 AM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
A 2-link w/long bars won't be as bad on pinion-angle change as one w/short bars (a 2-link that uses stock front leaf hangers uses short bars).
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
08-30-2009, 12:35 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maple valley WA.
Posts: 128
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
I have an ekstinsive 2 link on my 88.It works great for me cause I set it up to ride low so I never worry about my pinion angle.As far as ride ive drove alot of bagged rides and It rides with the best of them.Ive never have any problems with mine.
If your wanting to hit side to side alot I wouldnt recomend the 2 link.But if rollin low is what your looking for at a low cost go for it. Im not trying to argue 2 link vs 4 link just giving my input on what I have,and what I have worked with. Heres mine. |
08-30-2009, 01:00 PM | #16 |
Happy to be here
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
Thanks for the input redsled04. That's the kind of information we needed here.
BTW- Truck looks awesome...
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" |
08-31-2009, 02:20 PM | #18 |
On the fast track to nowhere..
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Splendora, Texas
Posts: 5,316
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
I built my own 2 link for my 88, because I was low on cash flow I used a couple of pipe nipples, cut the inside out enough to press some factory leaf spring bushings in. Welded them to some 2.5" .25 wall square tubing. I also used 3" blocks with them. I welded the lower plates to them and the uppers to the frame, installing a crossmember between the two uppers to prevent flex. Then I welded a 2" round tube between the two arms directly under the axle to prevent side to side movement. I drove it for 2 years with 0 problems. I'll see if I have some pics. Edit: Guess I don't have any of the suspension...
__________________
-Mike Owen- Norwood, Houston, Cecilia, Jackson, Monroe and counting Last edited by BACKYARD88; 08-31-2009 at 02:29 PM. |
09-02-2009, 02:03 AM | #20 |
Backwoods Body
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 146
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
Hey matt I don't know how much fabbing your wanting to do but a parallel 4 link or tri 4 link only costs the price of material by the length of two more bars. The only problem I've heard out of the two link is like pulling in and out of places that aren't flat you throw everything into a bind becuase if one wheel wants to go up they both wanna go up and as you know both wheels dont hit an incline at the same time if your turning. Also with the two link you cant drive very far at different heights due to pinion angle. a 4link keeps closer to the pinion angle you set all the way through the suspension travel. Either way you do it though it'll be sweet! I love bagged rides keep us posted. With pics of course. p.s. if you go with the 2 link all you need to stop side to side movement is a panhard bar being as you won't be adjusting the ride height and driving. A watts is used with high travel suspensions b/c a panhard pushes or pulls the tires to one side or the other while going up and down. Just my $.02 tho
|
09-02-2009, 03:08 PM | #21 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Windsor, CA
Posts: 500
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
Quote:
A Parallel 3 or 4-link with a Panhard bar or Watt's link would be much better than your 2-link idea in the long run.
__________________
If you can find it cheaper, I can fix it! |
|
09-02-2009, 06:30 PM | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: kissimmee Florida
Posts: 494
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
I don't agree about things binding up they used two link on a lot of trucks and cars. Two link is not the best for air bagging but if set up right you should have no problem. You need to set the pinion angle where your right hight will be. I just installed mine and will check how much the P/A changes . I do agree to use a trianglated mount to the diff instead of a panhard bar.
|
09-02-2009, 06:54 PM | #23 |
Superbad
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Posts: 153
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
I'm gonna set my Suburban up with a torque arm style suspension with a watts link when I get around to baggin it. GM used the torque arm suspensions in Camaros & Firebirds for years. Lots of aftermarket companies are making torque arm suspensions to bolt into earlier Camaros, Firebirds & Mustangs. The torque arm suspension might also give me the room to keep the back & third row seat. The only down side to torque arm suspension is that it will change the pinion angle just like a two link.
|
09-02-2009, 07:11 PM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: kissimmee Florida
Posts: 494
|
Re: Rear suspension... thinking out loud
The torque arm ,2 link, is still a trailing arm suspension which have been used for years. For someone starting out their easy to build their cheap and they work. I have less than 50 bucks and maybe 5hrs build time. After I'm on the road I"ll change it to a 4 link.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|