|
07-21-2010, 08:06 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: stoddard nh
Posts: 693
|
rocker arms 292
what are the differences between big block chevy and inline 6 rocker arms? both list as 7/16" stud, are they the same? if so would a set of 1.8 ratio one fit on my 292 i dont want to have to tear into the motor for a cam swap and my buddy might be parting out his 496 stroker with 1.8 rockers, thought it might provide a little extra lift and power with out over stressing the springs and be an easy install. thanks for all your help!
__________________
1972 gmc c25 292/sm465 dana 60 w/5.13s 1973 vw super beetle 1600cc/4spd(baja bug) 1974 chevy c60 351v6/np-540+2 speed eaton rear 2005 chevy cobalt 2.2l |
|
|
|
07-21-2010, 08:46 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,489
|
Re: rocker arms 292
His may be 7/16", but yours are probably the original 3/8".
It's doubtfull you would see any gain, even with a warmed up engine. Most aftermarket rockers have clearance issues on the end rockers and require a different valve cover.
__________________
'67 GMC 2500, 292, 4spd, AC |
|
|
|
|
07-21-2010, 09:35 PM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: stoddard nh
Posts: 693
|
Re: rocker arms 292
so inline 6 rockers are originally 3/8? why are all the ones i see listed as 7/16"? am i the only one who didn't know this lol dumb me.
__________________
1972 gmc c25 292/sm465 dana 60 w/5.13s 1973 vw super beetle 1600cc/4spd(baja bug) 1974 chevy c60 351v6/np-540+2 speed eaton rear 2005 chevy cobalt 2.2l Last edited by 292farmer; 07-21-2010 at 09:36 PM. |
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
