Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-23-2010, 10:14 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: logan utah
Posts: 78
|
most cost efficiant way to lower.
I have a 1969 Chevy 3/4 LWB that I want to drop a few inches. But I don't want to go the airbag route (YET). I am looking for the cheapest route possible with out changing my suspension geometry to much I.E. camber and such. I have heard about cutting your springs but I also have heard that it will weaken them as well. I have rear trailing arms on my truck as well. I don't want an extreme drop just maybe a 2" in the front and 3" in the rear. I plan on getting some 18" - 20" rims some where down the roads. Thanks for the help.
Excuse the mess in the bed just drove this baby 1200 miles on 4 flat lobes. and there is alot of weight in the bed making it look lower.
__________________
1969 C20 3/4 ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Last edited by RIA69; 09-23-2010 at 10:15 PM. |
09-24-2010, 12:05 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 78
|
Re: most cost efficiant way to lower.
if the 3/4 ton trucks are the same as the 1/2 ton, in the rear, blocks or I've seen people put some type of jeep springs on the rear. in the front, cheapest other than cutting, which i wouldn't advice, would be drop coils, but you'll have to get an alignment. Drop spindles are the next in price.
2wd right? |
09-24-2010, 12:21 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: logan utah
Posts: 78
|
Re: most cost efficiant way to lower.
ya its 2wd sorry forgot to mention it. So just going with say some lowering coils for both front and rear all I would really need to do is get an alignment to make sure it rides straight? I'm not new to trucks this is my second 67-72 my first was a 70 exactly the same as this one. but I have never considered lowering a truck before. I used to cringe at the site of one but now for some reason I cant get enough of em. If I had the money I would just put some bags under it but I dont want to have to weld anything or cut things up.
__________________
1969 C20 3/4 ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ |
09-24-2010, 12:41 AM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,097
|
Re: most cost efficiant way to lower.
Dropped coils or spindles for the front (spindles require disc brakes though). 2" lowering blocks for the rear & a drop coil that's rated capacity if you need a little more.
Quote:
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. Last edited by SCOTI; 09-24-2010 at 12:42 AM. |
|
09-24-2010, 01:47 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: logan utah
Posts: 78
|
Re: most cost efficiant way to lower.
I dont intend on hauling much in this truck. I would rather not upgrade to disc right now either. I know I'm a cheap A.. so at the moment it looks like lowering springs for the front and then blocks and coils for the rear? where would be the best place to order this from? what would be the best drop with out affecting geometry?
Here is something I found that I would like to use if its a complete kit and if its worth the price and if it will work with my truck. http://shop.suspensionmax.com/Shop/C...ds_per_page/96
__________________
1969 C20 3/4 ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Last edited by RIA69; 09-24-2010 at 01:58 AM. |
09-24-2010, 06:12 AM | #6 |
1970 C10 six
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 186
|
Re: most cost efficiant way to lower.
Just a heads up the 3/4 ton springs are rated different than the 1/2 ton I believe so you need to buy specific springs, gmcpaul sells them, very friendly and will answer all your questions. He is who I went through to drop my Longhorn.
__________________
1970 C10 L6 250 three speeder |
09-24-2010, 10:11 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,097
|
Re: most cost efficiant way to lower.
Cheap drop = cutting coils or swapping dropped coils in which means the geometry will be affected. Drop spindles (and the req'd disc brakes) = more $$ but no geometry change.
I would recommend checking w/a board vendor before you spend your money. They might have similar pricing & take the time/effort to support this board (the community that took time to answer your questions).
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
09-24-2010, 01:31 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: logan utah
Posts: 78
|
Re: most cost efficiant way to lower.
so would this be my best bet? would 6 or 5 lug be a better option for my 3/4 ton?
http://www.classicperform.com/Store/...6772GSK-5D.htm thanks again.
__________________
1969 C20 3/4 ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ |
09-24-2010, 02:17 PM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,097
|
Re: most cost efficiant way to lower.
Quote:
As for changing the bolt pattern, I guess it depends on what you plan to do for wheels. Personally, I like 5-lug wheels. I know if you're running solid/steelies, you can run different bolt patterns F/R & hide them under a hubcap so it's not obvious. If you weren't planning to include wheels in your budget, what you have will work w/the drop springs or you can get spindles for a 3/4 ton truck & keep it 8-lug..... so it depends on what you like.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. Last edited by SCOTI; 09-24-2010 at 02:19 PM. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|