Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-24-2013, 08:47 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: North Texas
Posts: 118
|
402 with Edelbrock Performer intake
Recently started over with a rebuild on my 402. Thinking of changing the cast iron intake because of coolant seepage thru the casting in one small area. Looking for opinions on the Edelbrock Performer on a stock rebuild.
Any issues with the way the heater hoses, vacuum lines, and throttle cable attaches? Going to stick with my Quadrajet. Any opinions and/or advise appreciated. Anyone with pics of the same set up, please share. Thanks in advance!
__________________
Jeff Horsman 1972 C20 Highlander "C" 1966 Olds 442 L69 four speed 1971 Skylark (GS clone racecar) 494 stroker 1986 Buick T-Type |
02-24-2013, 09:00 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Edmonton alta
Posts: 41
|
Re: 402 with Edelbrock Performer intake
They're good for bottom end, worth a few ponies over stock anyway. They do look better then a cast manifold as well. If you're running stock heads with a stock cam a performer manifold will do just fine.
|
02-24-2013, 09:53 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 1,107
|
Re: 402 with Edelbrock Performer intake
Depending on what your doing in the rebuild. I would go with a matching cam to really improve the torque of that 402. I had a Monte Carlo with a 402 bb I ran a performer camshaft iirc it was around 512 lift. It pulled hard.
Posted via Mobile Device |
02-25-2013, 08:23 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mesa az
Posts: 211
|
Re: 402 with Edelbrock Performer intake
FYI. If you get a air gap make sure you the ARP 502 bolt set. They are a bit longer. You will need it. The air gap is a great intake too check it out.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|