Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-08-2015, 03:21 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 349
|
For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
The later shafts are longer than the early shafts which leaves too big of a gap between the splines and the lower column bearing.
Even with the intermediate shaft telescoped all the way out, there is still roughly 1-1.5" gap between the spring and the top of the factory u joint. It's almost enough room to need 2 springs. Since the extra length is in the shaft itself, no amount of intermediate shaft adjustments will take up that extra slack. I'm just curious what everyone else has done. I'm thinking about just running an extra spring. Btw, I need an extra spring if someone has one they don't need! |
03-08-2015, 07:00 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary Alberta
Posts: 1,170
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
I think I know what you are referring to but maybe add some pictures.
Do you not have a clamp that can be raised or lowered on the shaft to keep spring pressure on the lower bearing and which in turn pulls the shaft down into the upper bearing? Here's what I did as I remember it. I took the shaft and PS box from a 67. For the lower bearing, to replace the ball assembly that had disintegrated, I used a brass bushing that I got from Classic Industries listed for that specific purpose. I greased that all up and it is safety held in with a large washer under it and spring and clamp to the shaft. The shaft length was correct and hooked right up to the rag joint of the PS box and the universal is in about mid range. Works really good with no slop, horn and signals work good too. I should add that the bushing was a few thou too tight for the bearing support block at the bottom of the column that it has to fit into and should be checked first before installing it, if you decide to go that route. |
03-08-2015, 07:10 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary Alberta
Posts: 1,170
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
I removed the manual box and solid shaft and added the PS box with collapsible shaft. Could that be where the difference in shaft lengths is coming from? I thought I remembered laying them all side by side and they were the same but that was almost two years ago.
|
03-08-2015, 08:10 PM | #4 |
1965 Chevy C10, 2005 4.8L/4l60
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 8,546
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
Cut the original long shaft, add splines, use the 67-72 intermediate shaft and your done
__________________
Clyde65 Rebuild of Clyde http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post8338184 69 Aristocrat Lo Liner build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post7561684 support our troops! |
03-08-2015, 08:14 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 349
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
Yeah, I'm running a PS box now with captainfab bracket, as well as the 67-72 shaft and intermediate. Rag joint deleted with Borgeson u joint.
I forgot to get pictures when I was at my shop. |
03-08-2015, 08:46 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Lockhart Texas
Posts: 66
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
I had the same problem in my 65.Couldnt figure out why there was so much play in the column.Plus my steering wheel stuck out about a inch off the collar.You need the spring and the big washer that goes in there.It will fix your problem.
|
03-08-2015, 08:48 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary Alberta
Posts: 1,170
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
I don't know if my picture will work.
I think you are just missing the clamp under the spring. |
03-08-2015, 09:04 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Lockhart Texas
Posts: 66
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
There is a steering column schematics on one of these threads but I cant find it.Once I took a look at it I found out what I was missing.I needed a pre-load sprind and washer.I also had to splice the shift rod.It was too long.
|
03-08-2015, 10:01 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 349
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
Any idea where you can buy them? I have a spare '72 column but don't have those parts. Currently have the spring that was on the stock '65 column. Also unless the 67-72 spring is longer that washer won't help as I have about 1.5" gap right now.
Finding these trucks in the yards down here is extremely difficult. |
03-08-2015, 10:08 PM | #10 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Lockhart Texas
Posts: 66
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
Quote:
|
|
03-08-2015, 11:54 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 349
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
|
03-09-2015, 12:06 AM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 349
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
If I can just remove that spring all together then there isn't really an issue. Since I'm not using column shift does it serve any other purpose than to keep tension on the shifting mechanism?
|
03-09-2015, 08:58 AM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary Alberta
Posts: 1,170
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
You need the spring to keep tension on the bearings. Without it the bearings will come apart. How many old trucks have you seen with a disintegrated lower bearing and the shaft almost cut through? I positioned the clamp so that when putting on the steering wheel it pulls the shaft up a bit thereby compressing the spring and keeping tension on the bearings.
I think a 67 setup is the same. A 67 inner shaft assembly can go into a 66 column. This worked for me. I can't remember seeing the spring on a 68 I used to own. Maybe they changed it by then. |
03-09-2015, 01:21 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 349
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
Yep, I'm missing the clamp. I remember pulling it off now, but have no idea where it is. Anyone have an idea where to get one? These trucks are near impossible to find in the yards down here.
Last edited by w00dst0ck; 03-09-2015 at 03:25 PM. |
03-09-2015, 08:31 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary Alberta
Posts: 1,170
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
I am not sure as what to write but it looks to me like the clamp is there. It is that piece with the bolt through it and the nut showing. I don't see the big washer like on mine and hard to tell if your lower bearing is set up right but maybe these things change from year to year or where they were built. That thing on mine below the clamp that looks like a clamp is part of the 67 shaft and joint but wouldn't be part of yours because you are using the Borgeson joint in its place. That's my story but others please help.
|
03-09-2015, 11:44 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 349
|
Re: For those that have swapped 67-72 shafts in your 64-66 columns
That's just a picture I grabbed off google to show what part I'm missing. This is what my setup looks like currently.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|