04-09-2015, 06:00 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 9
|
5.3 or 454
Im thinking of doing one or the other of these swaps. What is your guys experience with them? Also which one would you choose? What are ones benefits over the other? Thanks in advance.
|
04-09-2015, 06:02 PM | #2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Bonham, Texas
Posts: 241
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
Quote:
However the 5.3 would be harder to swap in than the 454. |
|
04-09-2015, 11:08 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 5,811
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
To me depends how you use your truck.If its a driver go 5.3 if its a weekend toy or something that will pull a lot of weight go big block.
|
04-09-2015, 11:25 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Northern California
Posts: 422
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
Went from 350 to 454. In total, cost about $6k with the rebuild and chasing brackets and all the small parts. That was with a chassis those came in! I couldn't tell you the cost of a 5.3 swap. I am VERY HAPPY with the 454 though! I built it for torque, and it has a load of it on tap! You do need to go into it though with the understanding fuel economy is not a concern and any you get is icing on the cake!
We had a Tahoe with the 5.3 and drivability was nice! Good power too! Mileage was pretty good as well! I am just a sucker for a big block! |
04-10-2015, 10:57 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Spearfish South Dakota
Posts: 407
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
Seems like a choice between 2 completely different options What do you have to put it in? transmission? Rear end gearing?
__________________
83 c10 long Box Daily Driver 90 Jimmy parked 98 Road King/ 06 Road Glide In memorium 63 impala SS/ 65 Chevy Panel 65 GMC Short Box/ 68 Camero |
04-10-2015, 11:23 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Gallatin, TN
Posts: 782
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
There's no replacement for displacement.........
__________________
77 C10, 6.0LS/4L80E, 3:73 12 bolt. Boss 338's 20" x 10" w/ 285/50/20 rear. 20" x 8.5" w/ 245/40/20 front. Vintage Air. Full Autometer gauges recessed in factory bezel (Thanks bigblock73!) Gm Storm Grey Metallic paint "Cool ain't ever cheap and cheap ain't ever cool" |
04-10-2015, 11:34 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 9
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
It's a '80 c10 shortbed stock rear and a th350. I want power but I'm not looking for crazy power 400-500 range is fine. It also comes down to time because I'm joining the service soon.
|
04-10-2015, 12:06 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Northern California
Posts: 422
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
Either will probably require a transmission swap either to hold up to the power of get the most out of the 5.3. Since time is now a concern, I would probably go 454 since it is bolt in and requires no fab. Whichever swap you do, it might be easiest to buy a donor truck and scrap the rest.
|
04-10-2015, 12:32 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Spearfish South Dakota
Posts: 407
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
A 350 or 383 would be my choice a BB cost just about twice to build, still not sure what Eng have now. the trans would be just fine. and cost about half what either the other 2 would. Again that's me. I dam near bought a 396 guy had built sold the car. Going with a350 to replace 6 cyl.
__________________
83 c10 long Box Daily Driver 90 Jimmy parked 98 Road King/ 06 Road Glide In memorium 63 impala SS/ 65 Chevy Panel 65 GMC Short Box/ 68 Camero |
04-10-2015, 01:21 PM | #10 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 9
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
Quote:
|
|
04-10-2015, 01:38 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: MA
Posts: 207
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
I swapped a 454 into my 83, which also has a TH350. Towed a lot with it, even with a lift and 35 inch tires. One time I had a 1 ton roller in the back, while towing a 5 ton roller on a trailer. The BB was great. A gas guzzling pig too. With a Quadrajet, it would average 6-8 mpg. I mistakenly swapped a Holley on there and mpgs got much worse.
If you can do it, I think the LS is a hot ticket. Daily its more common (like a Cummins swap), but its just a great engine. And will make a very fun driver. A full swap from a donor truck with transmission is the best set up. Might be the most cost effective as well.
__________________
2012 Chevy 2500HD, 6.0L, 6spd auto, 4x4, ECSB 1987 GMC V3500 Dump, 6.2L diesel, TH400 1983 GMC K2500 - awaiting its restoration and Cummins swap. |
04-10-2015, 01:38 PM | #12 |
yeller
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 13,824
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
454 for ease if install and to make a statement and sound good, LS for mileage and modern performance
If you go BB, you could always add aftermarket EFI down the road...
__________________
Jeff 73-87.com 73-87.com Facebook page 73-87 cab corner 6x9 speaker brackets for sale 67-72 cab corner speaker brackets for sale 47-54 cab corner speaker brackets for sale |
04-10-2015, 01:48 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 9
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
Thanks for all the input everyone
|
04-11-2015, 12:20 AM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 5,811
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
Or be different swap in a caddy big block or a diesel.With these trucks just about any engine will fit.
|
04-11-2015, 11:25 AM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Ruston, LA
Posts: 44
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
I would go with the 5.3. It will easily meet your power goals with good drivability and economy too. Plus they are super tough!
__________________
1983 GMC SWB - 350, TH-400 2002 Camaro SS - 408 9sec street car 2000 Trans Am - H/C/I 2014 Chevy Z71 |
04-13-2015, 12:59 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lancaster,Oh.
Posts: 138
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
I'm about to swap the 454 t.b.i./Th400 from my 87 R20 Suburban into my 85 305/th350 short bed. Probably will use the stiffer R20 3/4 ton springs, to help balance it out. I've heard just a cam swap and exhaust headers will bring power up allot (can't remember how much, but there is all kinds of info on internet about how to hop this block up on a budget). The price for heads for big blocks is crazy, and one of the most expensive part upgrades. Mileage with the t.b.i. still isn't great, but you get a few more than with a carb. You also have to remember you can't have both power and good mileage with a bbc, it's a compromise. If yo want good mileage and good power go with the LS. Wonder who on here has had both engines in their truck, and which engine they prefer. I would be interested to know.
|
04-13-2015, 06:05 PM | #17 |
driving is in my blood
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,750
|
Re: 5.3 or 454
Unless your towing and need alot of internal mass swinging around to create torque, OR you want the biggest, baddest NA engine around, then I don't see the point of a big block anymore.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle. -98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes. -02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front -CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me. |
Bookmarks |
|
|