Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-28-2018, 01:09 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OKC
Posts: 130
|
'68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
I'm close to what I thought was getting my truck swapped over to front disc. I bought some '86 3/4 ton brake parts and mostly used just the spindles and control arms, everything else is new - rotors, calipers, booster and MC as well as ball joints, bushings, springs and steering parts.
I decided to replace the rear brake line because the flare nut wouldn't thread into my new prop valve. It's the line that runs from the prop valve to a union along the frame. It's a 1/4" line and one end looks to be 9/16"-18 and the other is 7/16"-24. In researching what those sizes were I ran across more MC discussion. I have a 3/4 ton and the discussion was prop valve and MC connections and sizes. Basically, I'm now not sure I have what I should have concerning the prop valve and MC. I picked these up a while back.. Booster and MC; https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-760207 Prop valve; https://www.summitracing.com/parts/clp-pvks-2 I don't plan on any towing, at least nothing on a regular basis and there won't be much hauling. Am I installing the correct or incorrect parts? Thanks. |
01-29-2018, 04:33 AM | #2 |
Scrapper 1
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Riverside Calif
Posts: 1,649
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
I'm using my 3/4 ton A arms and using the CCP spindles with the stock A arms.Might have to swap out tie rods.And use moog upper and lower ball joints and control arm bushings
|
01-29-2018, 06:40 AM | #3 |
Old member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Liberty, & Garden City S.C. , U.S.
Posts: 19,945
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
I would just buy the adapter for it and use it.
That prop valve I wouldn't recommend it to use on a toy push car. I swapped my 71 over to all disc with it and it blew that front rubber out and I ran a stop sign with no brakes what so ever. I ended up getting a nice GM one with no plunger in front.
__________________
1971 LWB Custom, 6.0LS & 4L80E, Speedhut.com GPS speedometer & gauges with A/C. 20" Boss 338's Grey wheels 4 wheel disc brakes. My Driver Seeing the USA in a 71 Upstate SC GM Truck Club 2013,14 and 2016 Hot Rod Pour Tour http://upstategmtrucks.com/ Get out and drive the truck this summer and have some fun! It sucks not being able to hear! LWB trucks rule, if you don't think so measure your SWB! After talking to tech support at Air Lift I have found out that the kit I need is 60811. Per the measurements I gave them. Ride height of truck inside spring and inside diameter of springs. |
01-29-2018, 09:30 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OKC
Posts: 130
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
I've got all new rubber lines as well as keeping drums in the rear, maybe that'll help with your possible prop valve issue in my application??
I wasn't sure on the prop valve, mainly due to the way the 3/4 ton is connected differently than the 1/2 ton, as the prop valve connections look to be swapped. I've already pulled the brake line, just waiting on delivery of the new line to get it installed. When you refer to the plunger in the front, is that for the booster? |
02-15-2018, 11:58 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OKC
Posts: 130
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
Trying to finish up my drum to disc conversion, for now staying with the prop valve I linked above. I've got everything connected, all new components, mostly just OEM replacement parts.
Once I got some pressure on the lines, I started getting seepage from the banjo bolt on the right caliper on the caliper side of the banjo bolt. I've got washers on both sides of the rubber line connector. I've swapped out the crush washers 3-4 times already, cleaned the hose connector surface, pulled the caliper and cleaned that surface also. I've installed two washers on the caliper side to give that a try. There are visible rings on the caliper where the washer meets the surface and they are getting pressed into the washer, although not as deep as on the bolt head side. The seepage is enough to get the surface shiny but not enough to get much of a drip - yet. Any more suggestions other than a new caliper? |
02-15-2018, 08:22 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OKC
Posts: 130
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
Well, it looks like I got the seep resolved. After screwing around way too much yesterday on this, I went ahead and tried the annealing of the washer suggestion. Torched it up to nice and orange and then quenched it in water.
Snugged the banjo bolt nice and tight and no leak. Worst part was losing brake fluid down the inside of my tire. Maybe a 5 minute fix in total. On to the bleeding. I was basically just doing a gravity bleed, every now and then pump the pedal a few times and make sure the MC remains full. I've been getting a lot of clear fluid out but then I get a nice long line of small air bubbles. It kept going like this, back and forth, until I ran out of brake fluid to add so I had to stop. Is it typical to get air bubbles like this for up to 10-15 minutes doing gravity bleeding? I have no leaks I can see anywhere now but it just looks like the line is sucking in air from somewhere. |
02-15-2018, 08:28 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 2,178
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
Yes, I recently did all 4 corners on a 69 chevelle and I couldn't get a good pedal until I gravity bled it. Pretty frustrating.
__________________
"Work hard, use your vacation days." 1970 C15 GMC Long Bed 1986 C20 Scottsdale 1983 K2500 Sierra Classic Suburban 6.2 Instagram: C10sofOC |
02-19-2018, 07:09 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OKC
Posts: 130
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
I've had several 'seeps' at different connections that looks like I have now resolved. I'm still getting a nice line of air bubbles running through the tubing when I bleed all the corners and I'm not so sure it isn't the bleeders themselves letting air through when they're loose. I have a solid pedal but not sure on the prop valve, if it's actually centered. The dash brake light is a bit schizo right now, it's off/on. I was planning on a short road trip but had some other liquid escape captivity.
I replaced the steering gear box, so it's a new reman. It's been installed, new rag joint and fresh fluid. I filled the pump and after starting the truck, turned the wheel lock to lock to burp it and after about 4 times, the gear box puked all the fluid out of the bottom (opposite of the rag joint). Any help - other than R&R? |
02-26-2018, 11:07 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OKC
Posts: 130
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
It's been a bit cold and wet the last week or so but finally got the steering box swapped out with a replacement, got it connected, burped and no fluid in the drive. Small miracle.
That issue seems to be resolved but still having issues with the disk setup. I'm leaning toward the prop valve being the problem, but not for sure. I can get the rear drums to bleed okay, the pedal drops farther once I crack the bleeder (I'm utilizing a pedal pusher). The fronts are a different story, very little fluid runs out and there is no pedal movement when the bleeder is cracked. My thought is the prop valve not being centered. I've tried a few things to remedy that but not much luck. I tried opening both rear bleeders and pumping the brakes several times as well as mashing on the pedal with all the bleeders closed. Neither seems to have helped. Back to the prop valve, I have a 3/4 ton and everything I've seen has the rear of the valve connected to the front MC reservoir and the front of the valve connected to the rear of the MC reservoir. Should the prop valve linked above work as plumbed or would I need to move the lines so they are front to front and rear to rear? Thanks.
__________________
'68 GMC 3/4 Ton 350, 700R4 |
02-27-2018, 12:39 AM | #10 |
Who Changed This?
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,746
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
Make sure that you have the front and rear brakes supplied from the correct sides of the master cylinder.
__________________
~Steven '70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper Simi Valley, CA |
03-02-2018, 09:22 AM | #11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OKC
Posts: 130
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
Quote:
Once I get that done, it will now be the front PV connection to the front of the MC and the rear PV connection to the back of the MC. Need to pick up some more tubing today. Thanks.
__________________
'68 GMC 3/4 Ton 350, 700R4 |
|
03-04-2018, 04:31 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OKC
Posts: 130
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
After a few tries.....I got some tubing bent and then got the PV connected to the MC. Lots of fluid all over but it looks like everything has held as far as leaks are concerned. Went through some gravity bleeding as well as having a pedal pusher. Pedal was pretty firm and held up overnight. Went for a drive and the pedal went to the floor after about the 3rd stop, I felt kind of a pop and then... not much.
Got home and checked the PV based on the procedure in the pic attached. I was reading voltage (about 10VDC) so it looked like the PV wasn't centered. After the procedure, voltage went away. Bled some more and the pedal was nice and firm, almost hard. I then started the truck and the pedal went a good bit softer. What's up with that? A vacuum issue? I went for a drive regardless and the brakes worked fine, help up with a couple of hard stops, my concern is the pedal travel before it actually bites. So why would the pedal feel softer after starting the truck? How far should my pedal travel before I get a good feel that the brakes are engaging? Thanks.
__________________
'68 GMC 3/4 Ton 350, 700R4 |
03-04-2018, 06:25 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 7,728
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
Once the truck is running you get some assist from the booster. I think what you are describing is normal?
__________________
44 Willys MB 52 M38A1 64 Corvette Coupe 68 Camaro 'vert LT1 & TH700 69 Z/28 355 12.6's @110 69 Chevy Short Step 4 1/2"/7" drop 72 Jimmy 4WD 4spd 4" & 35's 02 GMC 2500HD 4x4 Duramax |
03-04-2018, 07:09 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 231
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
My disc brake converted 3/4 ton has a good bit of pedal travel before the brakes really grab.
The first half of travel it brakes only lightly. It annoys me also but it may we’ll be just how they are.
__________________
John 69 c20, 396, th400, dana60, ps, ac |
03-04-2018, 10:23 PM | #15 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OKC
Posts: 130
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
Quote:
I don't really know but that's what I was thinking. Quote:
I guess I'll see how it goes. I dropped it off at the brake and alignment shop this afternoon, I'll ask him to check things over when he aligns it. Thanks.
__________________
'68 GMC 3/4 Ton 350, 700R4 |
||
03-04-2018, 11:22 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Berryville Arkansas
Posts: 402
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
Have you adjusted the rear brakes? If they are out of adjustment it will cause increased travel in the pedal.
|
03-05-2018, 11:09 AM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OKC
Posts: 130
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
I've worked on the rears but did not adjust them, replaced the wheel cylinders and cleaned them up a while back. I hadn't thought of that as a possible cause.
Next on the list this week. Thanks.
__________________
'68 GMC 3/4 Ton 350, 700R4 |
03-05-2018, 01:25 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,470
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
>>Right now, the front of the MC supplies the rears and the rear of the MC supplies the fronts.<<
If that statement applies to that picture, you have got a real mess. That Combination Valve is comprised of three separate and independent components. The rubber cap covers the Metering Valve Pin and must be in the line to the front disc calipers. The Proportion Valve is on the other end and must be plumbed to the rear brakes.
__________________
'67 GMC 2500, 292, 4spd, AC |
03-05-2018, 02:08 PM | #19 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OKC
Posts: 130
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
Quote:
I swapped the connections (the pic in your reply) so they are as you're stating. The pic is how I have it plumbed now. Front of the PV and MC go to the calipers in the front. The rear of the PV and MC go to the drums in the back.
__________________
'68 GMC 3/4 Ton 350, 700R4 |
|
03-05-2018, 05:16 PM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,470
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
OK, for that.
>>Not much brake at all for at least 2-3" and then it grabs in less than that.<< There was some discussion between you and some others, somehow partially involving the booster. I couldn't really connect the dots so let me offer this. The boosters are designed to provide three strokes of the pedal after an engine dies so you still have some brake assist to get to the side of the road. With the engine off, push on the pedal three or more times. The pedal will get higher and quite firm. While still pushing on the pedal, start the engine. As the engine builds vacuum, the pedal will drop about an inch or sometimes more, but that just means it is assisting your foot pressure. Some of the bleeding problems you had can be attributed to the Metering Valve. The Metering Valve restricts fluid flow to the calipers until pressure reaches some preset threshold pressure. Often somewhere around 60 psi or higher. On your Combination Valve, when the Metering Valve opens, you will see the pin extend outward. Pop the rubber cover and have someone push the brake pedal. The pin should extend, then retract when they release the brake. Some of the early Metering Valves worked the opposite way. They retracted under pressure. There are tools for holding the pin out, to make bleeding easier.
__________________
'67 GMC 2500, 292, 4spd, AC |
03-05-2018, 06:02 PM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,470
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
In your first post,
>> I bought some '86 3/4 ton brake parts and << then >>I decided to replace the rear brake line .......................the line that runs from the prop valve to a union along the frame.<< Didn't that place the Combination Valve on the cross member under the radiator? The LMC image shows the Combo valve under the radiator, but the brakes aren't positioned correctly. The lines go through the frame in front of the brakes. I guess you didn't get that line. After your initial post, I had high hopes that you would. There are many thousands of posts on this forum, regarding guys having trouble finding the right flex hose so that it doesn't drag on the tire, get pinched or pull the end off under full suspension extension. Everyone tries to use the drum lines and routing and then always, always have trouble getting the various parts to connect and work well together. In my opinion, let Chevy do the engineering. They're much better at it. In my case, I used '76 parts and it bolted together like I had a '76. The holes for the lines through the frame, connecting to the flex lines was already there. The image below is just one example in thousands showing the problem of using the drum brake line that runs across the suspension cross member.
__________________
'67 GMC 2500, 292, 4spd, AC |
03-05-2018, 06:33 PM | #22 | |||
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OKC
Posts: 130
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I agree with that, I just wanted to go with discs in the front but may not have taken the best overall path - at least for me. If I would do this again, it would be a kit with all the parts instead of trying to make sure I have everything by doing my own research.
__________________
'68 GMC 3/4 Ton 350, 700R4 |
|||
03-05-2018, 09:26 PM | #23 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 892
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
Sorry for the high jack, but I was under the impression that my 69 k25 rear m/c reservoir was for rear brakes.
__________________
1969 GMC K25 2007 Chevy 2500HD Classic Duramax 1999 Tahoe 2DR 4WD Base Model 5.7l |
03-06-2018, 06:13 PM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OKC
Posts: 130
|
Re: '68 GMC 3/4 Ton Disc Conversion
I got the truck back this afternoon. Alignment was done but he couldn't remove all the camber so I've got about a degree of positive camber. Removed all the shims and that's what he had left. It doesn't sound like a big deal but anyone have any input on this, other than make sure I rotate the tires?
He did check the brakes.. adjusted the rears, which weren't grabbing and bled the system one more time, got little to no air out. Tightened the wheel bearings too. I guess I was a bit too worried about getting the bearings too tight. The pedal feels really good and it grabs sooner than it did before. I think the brakes are good at this point. Thanks for all the inputs. Sounds like I may need a water pump now..... awesome.
__________________
'68 GMC 3/4 Ton 350, 700R4 |
Bookmarks |
|
|