Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-21-2020, 06:53 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: lakeville, ma.
Posts: 32
|
3.73 or 3.42 with 33" tires
Hello, K10 short body 350, sm465, np208, 33" tires. Will be daily driver and occasional towing lawn equip. trailer. The question is 3.73 or 3.42, thanks.
|
01-21-2020, 10:35 AM | #2 |
Post Whore
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Alabama
Posts: 14,670
|
Re: 3.73 or 3.42 with 33" tires
What gears do you have now?...
Just keep in mind a well worn 33in tire and 3.42s will give you about the same rpm as the 3.73s and new tires I'd think 3.42s Heres a rpm calculator http://www.csgnetwork.com/multirpmcalc.html 3.42 gears..33in tires...1:1 final in trans ...65mph. =2263 rpm 3.73 gears..33 in tires...1:1 final in trans...65mph. =2469 rpm
__________________
Mongo...aka Greg RIP Dad RIP Jesse 1981 C30 LQ9 NV4500..http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=753598 Mongos AD- LS3 TR6060...http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...34#post8522334 Columbus..the 1957 IH 4x4...http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...63#post8082563 2023 Chevy Z71..daily driver Last edited by mongocanfly; 01-21-2020 at 10:43 AM. |
01-21-2020, 10:38 AM | #3 |
State of Confusion!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 47,221
|
Re: 3.73 or 3.42 with 33" tires
Personally, I would go with the 3.42 for the lower cruising RPM since your not towing or working it much.
__________________
Bill 1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside 2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC) Bill's Gallery Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift. Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God! |
01-21-2020, 10:50 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,628
|
Re: 3.73 or 3.42 with 33" tires
My K20 had 3.42 rear gears for awhile till I swapped in matching 3.73's with the front. My tires were 285/75/16's which worked out to 34" on the pyo rims roughly.
It was fine for driving, and hauling 1000 pounds of junk. After that it got weak pretty quickly. I had a hopped up 260hp 350ci crate motor. |
01-21-2020, 12:23 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colfax-California
Posts: 8,634
|
Re: 3.73 or 3.42 with 33" tires
3.42s or 3.73. I have 4.56s, but I have an overdrive
|
01-21-2020, 02:29 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Swaledale, IA
Posts: 485
|
Re: 3.73 or 3.42 with 33" tires
With no OD I'd go with 3.42s, better for driving over 65 mph (interstate driving).
|
01-21-2020, 06:09 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: lakeville, ma.
Posts: 32
|
Re: 3.73 or 3.42 with 33" tires
Thanks for all the opinions, it now has 2.73's they have to go, I don't know why they would even offer those in a 4x4. My 82 k10 stepside had 3.08's and those were awful.
|
01-21-2020, 06:49 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 2,611
|
Re: 3.73 or 3.42 with 33" tires
During most of the square years of 73-87, mfgs were dealing with the problems of mileage, emissions and changing gasoline formulations. Performance took a back seat. 2.73s kept the engine rpms down. Many of the EPA tests didn't really care if 0-60 was measured in minutes. And the OEM tires may have been smaller which could have bumped performance a bit.
|
01-21-2020, 07:58 PM | #9 |
Post Whore
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Alabama
Posts: 14,670
|
Re: 3.73 or 3.42 with 33" tires
my 85 had a sm465 and 2.73s...what a joke it was
__________________
Mongo...aka Greg RIP Dad RIP Jesse 1981 C30 LQ9 NV4500..http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=753598 Mongos AD- LS3 TR6060...http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...34#post8522334 Columbus..the 1957 IH 4x4...http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...63#post8082563 2023 Chevy Z71..daily driver |
01-21-2020, 08:22 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,696
|
Re: 3.73 or 3.42 with 33" tires
Funny, my 1980 was never a problem, except 4th gear was basically overdrive so you had to be about 35 mph. I just ran the stock tires, though.
It actually worked pretty good for towing my camper trailer. I could shift to 3rd on a hill and roar up the hill at 60 mph. I even towed my Cat on a heavy rented trailer over a high mountain pass. It went up just fine (2nd gear about 30-35 mph) but not so fun going down the other side. Didn't do that again. Oh yeah, that pickup got 18 mpg at then legal 55 mph, and still 15 mpg at 80 mph Was a bunch better than my 73 that hardly got 10 mpg.
__________________
Current/past Chevy/GMC trucks: 1958 Chevy C-60; 1965 GMC C-50; 1965 Chevy C-10; 1971 Chevy K-10; 1973 Chevy K-20; 1976 GMC C-20; 1977 Chevy C-10 Suburban; 1980 Chevy K-10; 1989 Chevy K1500; 1991 GMC V1500 Suburban; 2016 Chevy K2500 HD Other vehicles: 1988 Jeep XJ; 2011 Toyota 4Runner |
01-21-2020, 09:12 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gwinnett GA
Posts: 1,803
|
Re: 3.73 or 3.42 with 33" tires
To each their own. My 82 K10 has the 350/465 with 2.73s and I have no issue. 1st is still low, 2nd to take off, 3rd around town and 4th for 55+ mph. If I were to tow, I would never use 4th. I don't tow any trailers though.
Having had trucks with 2.73, 3.08 3.42 and 3.73, I would ask how often you run 70+ mph. If that is a rare occurrence, then you might like the 3.73s. You should get about 2600rpm at 65. Remember a "33" will measure about 31.5 when mounted. My 31s are 29.5 or so.
__________________
1982 K10 SWB 1987 V20 - Sold - Doh! Last edited by TwoFiftyShifter; 01-22-2020 at 05:42 AM. |
01-22-2020, 08:55 AM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 7,727
|
Re: 3.73 or 3.42 with 33" tires
Our ‘81 Jimmy had 2.56 for all you guys that think the 2.73 were bottom of the barrel.
My 72 Jimmy was 3.07 and with the 4 speed was actually a pretty nice combo with 235 75 15 tires. Was a DOG with the 33’s I put on it. 4.10 are perfect with 35’s and the SM465. If you EVER plan to even consider 35’s get the 3.73. If 33’s are the top of the ladder and no overdrive, the 3.42 works fine.
__________________
44 Willys MB 52 M38A1 64 Corvette Coupe 68 Camaro 'vert LT1 & TH700 69 Z/28 355 12.6's @110 69 Chevy Short Step 4 1/2"/7" drop 72 Jimmy 4WD 4spd 4" & 35's 02 GMC 2500HD 4x4 Duramax |
01-22-2020, 07:44 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: lakeville, ma.
Posts: 32
|
Re: 3.73 or 3.42 with 33" tires
No I don't ever plan on 35's, 33's are the biggest. I had 33's on my 82 k10 short stepside 350, sm465, 3.08, and it never really got great gas mileage and not great for towing either. Want to do better, trying to find the middle of the road gear, better mpg. and ok to tow.
|
01-22-2020, 10:22 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 7,727
|
Re: 3.73 or 3.42 with 33" tires
In the early 70's they chose gear for good all around performance not just for mileage. And the 3.07 gears with 28" tall tire is what GM thought was best for the 350 powered 1/2 tons.
33-28=5. 5/28=.17857 So the 33" tire is 17.86% taller than the 28. 3.07x17.86=.5483 and 3.07+.5483=3.62 So 3.62 is 17% more gear than 3.07 So to duplicate what GM thought was a good all around gear ratio you would want to go with a 3.62 gear. Since that is not a choice, you can go a little bit more gear with 3.73 or a little bit less with 3.42. With an auto and converter slippage along with 75 mph speed limits common, I would run the 3.42
__________________
44 Willys MB 52 M38A1 64 Corvette Coupe 68 Camaro 'vert LT1 & TH700 69 Z/28 355 12.6's @110 69 Chevy Short Step 4 1/2"/7" drop 72 Jimmy 4WD 4spd 4" & 35's 02 GMC 2500HD 4x4 Duramax |
Bookmarks |
|
|