Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-20-2020, 12:18 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Hartford Kentucky
Posts: 54
|
Compatible with 66 step side
I’ve got a 66 C10 long bed step side. I’ve been trying to update parts as I go with other models but I have a hard time finding what bolts up to this. For example, years that fit power steering, suspension to convert to calipers front and back, brake system. Really anything that can be upgraded with other models when I can instead of buying new.
I’m putting an early 70s sbc 400 in there now and would like to update some things while the engine is out and I have space. Also, I find 80-90s s10 all over the are that are now rollers but have fully bagged suspension and components that work. There’s no chance these would bolt up? These trucks go for $400-600 all day. Posted via Mobile Device |
12-20-2020, 12:27 PM | #2 |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: China Spring, TX
Posts: 7,280
|
Re: Compatible with 66 step side
We have a vendor on site (captainfab) who makes and sells the brake booster bracket to firewall here: http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...=1#post3257836
And the Power Steering bracket for the frame here: http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...d.php?t=332923 And if you look in our FAQ section here: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=646002 You will Disc Brakes links, for example - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=4450757 And - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=367260 etc, etc ...
__________________
Master Chief, US Navy, Retired 1964 C10 Step-side Short Bed - In Progress 2009 2500HD Duramax LTZ 1948 GMC Panel 1956 Big Window Stepside 1953 5 Window Chevy Stepside 1932 Coupe New Seat Foam for Bench Seats? |
12-20-2020, 08:36 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,783
|
Re: Compatible with 66 step side
S10 frames are not a good solution. Too small and according to Fatmans the A arm geometry is poor and handling especially suffers with wider tires. Mid 70's Squarebody frames will raise the truck to around the height of a stock 4x4.... but their front sub frame assembly and rear ends are commonly used. Luckily everything you need for your existing truck is out there and this forum is a great place to get it sorted out. After you check out the links that Rocknrod gave you you can certainly come back here with more specific questions and find the answers. I have a '66 too and I've done the squarebody subframe swap as a means to gain disc brakes and power steering. I still had to buy new parts, rotors, calipers, ball joints etc. Lucky for me the squarebody was a freebie so I saved a few bucks over the price of a complete kit. (Especially since I didn't want to lower the truck)
|
12-20-2020, 10:21 PM | #4 | |
60-66 Nut
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,252
|
Re: Compatible with 66 step side
Thank you for the recommendation. I appreciate it
Quote:
Most everything needed to upgrade a '60-'66 truck's brakes and steering can be sourced from a '73-'87 squarebody truck.
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE |
|
12-23-2020, 02:41 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Hartford Kentucky
Posts: 54
|
Thanks for the great info. I really look forward to getting started on the frame/body mods very soon. Rebuilding the 400 right now. I’ll keep an eye out for 70s trucks. I do want to lower mine but honestly the back is really the most I’m concerned about lowering. Just looks so high.
Posted via Mobile Device |
12-24-2020, 12:16 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,783
|
Re: Compatible with 66 step side
My advice is to get the front set up first and bring the back down to match. When I put the squarebody subframe on mine it came down about an inch an a half even though I re-used my same springs. Not sure why even the spindles are stock height .
|
12-24-2020, 11:06 AM | #7 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,094
|
Re: Compatible with 66 step side
Quote:
Do you mean you're using the square body front suspension pieces?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
12-24-2020, 11:16 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,783
|
Re: Compatible with 66 step side
Correct, from hub to hub....crossmember, A arms rotors etc, except I opted to use my same '66 springs.
I even started a thread about it coming out an inch and a half lower than planned. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=586664 |
12-24-2020, 11:57 AM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,094
|
Re: Compatible with 66 step side
Gotcha.
'Subframe' is usually used to describe the front 'frame' stub as in the rails/x-member/core support on a car like a Camaro/Nova car set-up. I get the crossmember swap.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
12-24-2020, 06:40 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,783
|
Re: Compatible with 66 step side
Sorry, I need to get my terminology straight. Btw, if you choose to go with a kit you pretty much end up with the same thing as there's not a whole lot of difference between the crossmembers....except for the U bolts that hold the lower A arms. The stock ones for our trucks were smaller and weaker, but it's simple to ream the holes and install the larger sqarebody U bolts.
Last edited by AcampoDave; 12-24-2020 at 07:13 PM. |
01-01-2021, 05:21 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: gulfport, ms
Posts: 14
|
Re: Compatible with 66 step side
I have a 87 r20 front cross member for my c20, have not installed it yet but what I like is the later model engine mounts. Much safer than the old ones. Especially if you are going to put some power under the hood.
__________________
65 stepside C20 |
01-01-2021, 09:58 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Wyoming USA
Posts: 2,455
|
Re: Compatible with 66 step side
So are these front cross members the same width as our rearend ?? I had to use the axles allso on my 69 when I used a 74 front.
__________________
2001 Silverado K-1500 2005 FXDWG stage3 69 CHEVY Short/Step 327/4L60 373 posi 63 IMPALA 327/4L60 |
01-02-2021, 01:38 AM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,094
|
Re: Compatible with 66 step side
The crossmembers are same in width. The brake combo will be where the track width change occurs. Original GM disc brakes have a wider track width vs drum brake trucks.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
Bookmarks |
|
|