The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-07-2004, 12:05 AM   #17
shuttermutt
Don't say "Oops!", Doctor
 
shuttermutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 677
Just a follow-up... During the Minnesota board meet on Saturday, Todd, Mike and I hung a new set of plugs (thanks for the helping hand, guys!), tweaked the IMS screws and gave 'er a bit more advance. Now it's pulling about 18 lbs (up by a few pounds) at an 800 rpm idle and definately picked up some power.

On Sunday I played with carb spacers. Much to my surprise, I got the biggest "seat of the pants" gain with a 2-inch tall, 4-hole, phenolic spacer from Edelbrock. It's more responsive through the entire rpm range that I drive in most of the time (idle through 3500). On the other hand, the 1-inch spacer (also Edelbrock) didn't seem to make any real difference at all.

Best of all, my hot start and idle problems are completely solved. I can run it hard and hot, kill the engine for 2 minutes or 2 hours, hop back in and she fires up with barely more than a bump on the starter and without putting my foot anywhere near the gas pedal. No more of that nasty cranking you heard Sunday, Todd!

The idle now sticks right at 800 rpm in Park and 650 rpm in Drive. I don't have any idle fluctuation, the response is as crisp as it's gonna get no matter how hard I hit the gas or at what rpm and, well... everything works. I did end up with a spacer since I use a drop-base air cleaner and a 4-inch K&N filter. Basically, it's like this from top-to-bottom:
  • air cleaner lid
  • 4-inch K&N filter
  • drop-base air cleaner bottom
  • 2-1/2 inch spacer
  • carb
  • 2-inch, 4-hole, phenolic spacer
  • Edelbrock Performer RPM intake
It all fits under there, but there's not much room for anything else. Now that I've found a combo that works for this particular engine, I'm sticking with it. Thanks to everyone that offered up their suggestions!
__________________
'Mutt
1968 CST LWB: R.I.P.
1967 Chevelle: TPI 454 beast
1967 C10 SWB: Claimed when Bumpster didn't put it on his list
shuttermutt is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com