The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-30-2012, 03:03 AM   #1
INSIDIOUS '86
Registered User
 
INSIDIOUS '86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: washington
Posts: 4,178
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

It seems that 12s in our trucks is using motors that usually have passenger cars doing 11s.
Weight and aerodynamics play into our factors here

A fiberglass hood and a tonneu cover can help a lot as well as just getting rid of meat all around. Our front "girder beam" suspension is built to destroy anything it hits but is also a good 250lbs! Our bumpers and hoods are silly heavy and the tailgate is 80lbs itself. No consider we are shaped like a brick hous or the side if a barn. The odds are against us. Our engines have to be bigger and stronger. A chipped newer silverado will give us all a run for our money these days.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
377 sbc thumpr cam autogear m23 muncie 3:73 Detroit trutrac
3''spintech prostreet mufflers xpipe 1 3/4 headers
build thread !http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=577217
Iroc gauge threadhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=554511
INSIDIOUS '86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 03:34 AM   #2
Scotty-D
Registered User
 
Scotty-D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Perry, Oklahoma
Posts: 157
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

The squarebodys are heavy, but not as bad as I would have thought. My 85 longbed weighs 4020 without the spare tire and about 5 gallons of gas in it. Iron head smallblock with a/c, and all the other accessories.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
85 Scottsdale LWB
383 227/235 105 lsa Howards Roller
TH350 by Jakes Performance, Sanger TX
Scotty-D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 06:17 PM   #3
chevybuilder18
Registered User
 
chevybuilder18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lincoln, IL
Posts: 880
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty-D View Post
The squarebodys are heavy, but not as bad as I would have thought. My 85 longbed weighs 4020 without the spare tire and about 5 gallons of gas in it. Iron head smallblock with a/c, and all the other accessories.
Posted via Mobile Device
dang. then our rigs from short bed to long shouldnt have that big of difference
__________________
Her name is Quicksilver
1978 Chevrolet silverado, shortbox stepside currently being swapped IN is a LM7 5300 vortec, 4l80E, factory 4.11s, slammed, a dream ride and coined QUICKSILVER
gotta pay $$ if you wanna play
chevybuilder18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 03:56 AM   #4
softballnrd27
Always a work in progress
 
softballnrd27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Harker Heights, TX
Posts: 1,599
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

200r4 are not the same as 700r4s. I have seen too many 700r4 issues to even consider running one(personal experience). The amount of money it takes to get a 60e up to the task of handling big power is better spent on a 80e in my opinion.
__________________
USMC Retired
Never trust a man who can't laugh at his own fart!
2010 Silverado Crew Cab
73 SWB 5.3/4l80e
Build Thread:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=695168
softballnrd27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 04:29 AM   #5
softballnrd27
Always a work in progress
 
softballnrd27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Harker Heights, TX
Posts: 1,599
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

I like the way you are thinking. Yes they bolt up to a th350 just fine, I have done it in my truck.
My advice is to look for a 2004 or newer iron block because they came with a little bit better rod. If you are going to replace the internals then it doesn't matter what year.
__________________
USMC Retired
Never trust a man who can't laugh at his own fart!
2010 Silverado Crew Cab
73 SWB 5.3/4l80e
Build Thread:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=695168
softballnrd27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 05:56 PM   #6
chevybuilder18
Registered User
 
chevybuilder18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lincoln, IL
Posts: 880
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by softballnrd27 View Post
I like the way you are thinking. Yes they bolt up to a th350 just fine, I have done it in my truck.
My advice is to look for a 2004 or newer iron block because they came with a little bit better rod. If you are going to replace the internals then it doesn't matter what year.
Yea did some research on these a while back with the only truck engine LQ4 6.0 liter LS that stood out at me. i like how everyone was putting them in front of Th350s and bolting em right up. Hell with these cubes, and the old 350 block out, certainly even carbed and iron heads, right out of the salvage yard should have some really good pep stock, and then when i do my LS3 head swap and turbo it should be pretty nice
__________________
Her name is Quicksilver
1978 Chevrolet silverado, shortbox stepside currently being swapped IN is a LM7 5300 vortec, 4l80E, factory 4.11s, slammed, a dream ride and coined QUICKSILVER
gotta pay $$ if you wanna play
chevybuilder18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 06:02 PM   #7
KQQL IT
At the body shop.
 
KQQL IT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Land of fruits and nuts.
Posts: 5,257
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

A 6.0 is 366" a 383 would be less $ and fabrication
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
" That didnt make it any newer "
" Dont antique the equipment "
KQQL IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 06:11 PM   #8
chevybuilder18
Registered User
 
chevybuilder18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lincoln, IL
Posts: 880
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KQQL IT View Post
A 6.0 is 366" a 383 would be less $ and fabrication
Posted via Mobile Device
i just found me a LQ4 all together for $450, another for $650 at the same salvage yard near by out of a Silverado 2500 series, not bad
__________________
Her name is Quicksilver
1978 Chevrolet silverado, shortbox stepside currently being swapped IN is a LM7 5300 vortec, 4l80E, factory 4.11s, slammed, a dream ride and coined QUICKSILVER
gotta pay $$ if you wanna play
chevybuilder18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2012, 01:00 AM   #9
softballnrd27
Always a work in progress
 
softballnrd27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Harker Heights, TX
Posts: 1,599
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

A LS swap is on par as far as $$$ with a 383 build.
__________________
USMC Retired
Never trust a man who can't laugh at his own fart!
2010 Silverado Crew Cab
73 SWB 5.3/4l80e
Build Thread:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=695168
softballnrd27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2012, 01:07 AM   #10
KQQL IT
At the body shop.
 
KQQL IT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Land of fruits and nuts.
Posts: 5,257
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

The engine yeah.
But i was thinking accesory drive, ignition and related bits and pieces
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
" That didnt make it any newer "
" Dont antique the equipment "
KQQL IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 11:05 AM   #11
chevybuilder18
Registered User
 
chevybuilder18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lincoln, IL
Posts: 880
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KQQL IT View Post
The engine yeah.
But i was thinking accesory drive, ignition and related bits and pieces
Posted via Mobile Device
idk sometimes you can score big on those. you never know
__________________
Her name is Quicksilver
1978 Chevrolet silverado, shortbox stepside currently being swapped IN is a LM7 5300 vortec, 4l80E, factory 4.11s, slammed, a dream ride and coined QUICKSILVER
gotta pay $$ if you wanna play
chevybuilder18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2012, 06:15 AM   #12
flamingbig10
6.0 powered square
 
flamingbig10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mesquite texas
Posts: 3,459
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

mines a baby cam lq9 with full bolts and tune 373s makes 370 to the wheels and runs roughly 12.7s with a very tight stall on drag radials, I will be running a 4000 stall cal tracs, slick and 150 shot should bring down well into the 11s
__________________
Aaron
1980 c-10 short bed lowered, cammed 6.0, 4l80e 3600 stall, smp tune, wilwoods, and flames best time so far best et 7.86 @87 on motor 7.57 90 on a 75 shot
Build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=283326
flamingbig10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 11:09 AM   #13
chevybuilder18
Registered User
 
chevybuilder18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lincoln, IL
Posts: 880
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamingbig10 View Post
mines a baby cam lq9 with full bolts and tune 373s makes 370 to the wheels and runs roughly 12.7s with a very tight stall on drag radials, I will be running a 4000 stall cal tracs, slick and 150 shot should bring down well into the 11s
running an LS with all bolt ons? and getting that? sounds like those hotrod magazine gurus werent right about 500 hp at the fly wheel with just a cam swap, dang , id try 2500 stall, with balloon plates, make sure it has those plates, some converters like to come apart with the nitro or other sorts of boosting on N/A Engine
__________________
Her name is Quicksilver
1978 Chevrolet silverado, shortbox stepside currently being swapped IN is a LM7 5300 vortec, 4l80E, factory 4.11s, slammed, a dream ride and coined QUICKSILVER
gotta pay $$ if you wanna play
chevybuilder18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2012, 07:08 AM   #14
INSIDIOUS '86
Registered User
 
INSIDIOUS '86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: washington
Posts: 4,178
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

Should do one mid at a Tim for us so we can see what starts making the biggest difference. Other than tho nos fogger...
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
377 sbc thumpr cam autogear m23 muncie 3:73 Detroit trutrac
3''spintech prostreet mufflers xpipe 1 3/4 headers
build thread !http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=577217
Iroc gauge threadhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=554511
INSIDIOUS '86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 11:42 PM   #15
flamingbig10
6.0 powered square
 
flamingbig10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mesquite texas
Posts: 3,459
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

i could see 500hp with cam and heads, a 2500stall would be way to small
__________________
Aaron
1980 c-10 short bed lowered, cammed 6.0, 4l80e 3600 stall, smp tune, wilwoods, and flames best time so far best et 7.86 @87 on motor 7.57 90 on a 75 shot
Build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=283326
flamingbig10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 01:18 AM   #16
INSIDIOUS '86
Registered User
 
INSIDIOUS '86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: washington
Posts: 4,178
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

A 3000 with lockup would be just right lol
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
377 sbc thumpr cam autogear m23 muncie 3:73 Detroit trutrac
3''spintech prostreet mufflers xpipe 1 3/4 headers
build thread !http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=577217
Iroc gauge threadhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=554511
INSIDIOUS '86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 04:45 AM   #17
chevybuilder18
Registered User
 
chevybuilder18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lincoln, IL
Posts: 880
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by INSIDIOUS '86 View Post
A 3000 with lockup would be just right lol
Posted via Mobile Device
what he said^ lol 4000 stall is alot
__________________
Her name is Quicksilver
1978 Chevrolet silverado, shortbox stepside currently being swapped IN is a LM7 5300 vortec, 4l80E, factory 4.11s, slammed, a dream ride and coined QUICKSILVER
gotta pay $$ if you wanna play
chevybuilder18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 02:03 PM   #18
redsled87
Registered User
 
redsled87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Lanc Co PA
Posts: 226
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

I went 11.82 in the truck in my avatar. Its a 496 with a set of mild ported 781's with, stock valves. It has 10.3 comp with a solid flat tappet cam and a gasket matched 70's torkerII and a 950hp. It also has Hooker super comps and 3" side exit exhaust with 40 series flowmasters. I'm running a TH375 with an ATI manual valvebody and a Jeg's 10" 3400 stall converter. On that pass I was running a 10 bolt with 3.73's and a rebuilt stock posi. I'm getting a 9" together with 4.11's a detriot locker for 35 spline axles. I have 275/60/15 BFG drag radials on it. With the 9", I'm going to put 325/50/15 M/T drag radials. I've also got Camaro coils in the front and, I cut out 4 of the 6 plies on the leaf springs. I also made up my own caltracs too as well as, Comp Engineering drag shocks at all four corners. I don't understand why some of the guys in this thread are saying that, faster than 12's in these trucks is crazy. My truck was very stable on all of the passes I made that day.
__________________
1987 R10 Pump Gas 496/TH375
Best 1/4 pass to date
60' 1.49
1/4 10.93
MPH 120
redsled87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 08:48 PM   #19
INSIDIOUS '86
Registered User
 
INSIDIOUS '86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: washington
Posts: 4,178
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsled87 View Post
I went 11.82 in the truck in my avatar. Its a 496 with a set of mild ported 781's with, stock valves. It has 10.3 comp with a solid flat tappet cam and a gasket matched 70's torkerII and a 950hp. It also has Hooker super comps and 3" side exit exhaust with 40 series flowmasters. I'm running a TH375 with an ATI manual valvebody and a Jeg's 10" 3400 stall converter. On that pass I was running a 10 bolt with 3.73's and a rebuilt stock posi. I'm getting a 9" together with 4.11's a detriot locker for 35 spline axles. I have 275/60/15 BFG drag radials on it. With the 9", I'm going to put 325/50/15 M/T drag radials. I've also got Camaro coils in the front and, I cut out 4 of the 6 plies on the leaf springs. I also made up my own caltracs too as well as, Comp Engineering drag shocks at all four corners. I don't understand why some of the guys in this thread are saying that, faster than 12's in these trucks is crazy. My truck was very stable on all of the passes I made that day.
Not with a big block! That's easy. But making a sbc do it and be Daily driver as well. Just a lot tougher
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
377 sbc thumpr cam autogear m23 muncie 3:73 Detroit trutrac
3''spintech prostreet mufflers xpipe 1 3/4 headers
build thread !http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=577217
Iroc gauge threadhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=554511
INSIDIOUS '86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 10:21 PM   #20
cmyc5575
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: okc, OKlahoma
Posts: 483
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by INSIDIOUS '86 View Post
Not with a big block! That's easy. But making a sbc do it and be Daily driver as well. Just a lot tougher
Posted via Mobile Device
Oh YAAAA! Well i have a stock 305 and of course im running less than 12m in the 1/4!!! And its still my D/D!
cmyc5575 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2012, 02:37 AM   #21
redsled87
Registered User
 
redsled87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Lanc Co PA
Posts: 226
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by INSIDIOUS '86 View Post
Not with a big block! That's easy. But making a sbc do it and be Daily driver as well. Just a lot tougher
Posted via Mobile Device
Nobody specified at the start of the thread!!! It is easier with a big block though. The best I got out of my sbc was a 13.25 @ 104. That was the same suspension set up and rear too. It was a mild .060 over 350 with, Vortec heads and(I know I might hear about this) a big mutha thumpr cam. But, I got the best ever passes with that cam! But, I wasn't expecting an 11 sec pass that day. I figured low 12's. On the 11.82 pass, it spun the tires when I hit 2nd. So, hopefully with a few tweaks, I'll have an 11.50 truck. Eventually, I want to get it into the 10's and be street legal. But right now, its really streetable. With, the exception of the fuel mileage of an almost 500 cube big block.
__________________
1987 R10 Pump Gas 496/TH375
Best 1/4 pass to date
60' 1.49
1/4 10.93
MPH 120
redsled87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2012, 04:22 PM   #22
INSIDIOUS '86
Registered User
 
INSIDIOUS '86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: washington
Posts: 4,178
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsled87 View Post
Nobody specified at the start of the thread!!! It is easier with a big block though. The best I got out of my sbc was a 13.25 @ 104. That was the same suspension set up and rear too. It was a mild .060 over 350 with, Vortec heads and(I know I might hear about this) a big mutha thumpr cam. But, I got the best ever passes with that cam! But, I wasn't expecting an 11 sec pass that day. I figured low 12's. On the 11.82 pass, it spun the tires when I hit 2nd. So, hopefully with a few tweaks, I'll have an 11.50 truck. Eventually, I want to get it into the 10's and be street legal. But right now, its really streetable. With, the exception of the fuel mileage of an almost 500 cube big block.
Hey I have the small thumpr in mine. It's a great cam for anybody who wants the sound power and drivability and brakes. With most other cams you can only have two of those. Just idiots buy them then hate them cause they think a half inch lift cam is going to work well on factory small block heads...no.
But it was never specified but since the original poster has a sbc I figure the thread may be better suited to sbc related stuff

I think the real the real issue is the line that while not thin but def not big is getting our bricks to do lower than 12s and still be what they are, a truck. I mean lighter smaller camaros and mustangs older Vettes and such. 450hp and your there and grandma can still drive it if your combo is good. For our trucks about 550hp is needed or 500 and a well thought setup.

So while today's tech has certainly made this possible in a sbc and a bbc can do this with ease I think we all know its easy to do 10s with our trucks and we all know basicly how to do it. Not hard to figure out that big meats a good rear susp and big motor and being stripped will get you there. But doing it and being street able esp with a small block. I think that is what maybe this thread should focus on and some bbc too cause we love em. But hey who here can say tomarow they are just going to buy an ls7 for 12k tomarow and throw it in? Not very realistic now is it?
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
377 sbc thumpr cam autogear m23 muncie 3:73 Detroit trutrac
3''spintech prostreet mufflers xpipe 1 3/4 headers
build thread !http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=577217
Iroc gauge threadhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=554511
INSIDIOUS '86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2012, 03:13 AM   #23
chevybuilder18
Registered User
 
chevybuilder18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lincoln, IL
Posts: 880
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by INSIDIOUS '86 View Post
Hey I have the small thumpr in mine. It's a great cam for anybody who wants the sound power and drivability and brakes. With most other cams you can only have two of those. Just idiots buy them then hate them cause they think a half inch lift cam is going to work well on factory small block heads...no.
But it was never specified but since the original poster has a sbc I figure the thread may be better suited to sbc related stuff

I think the real the real issue is the line that while not thin but def not big is getting our bricks to do lower than 12s and still be what they are, a truck. I mean lighter smaller camaros and mustangs older Vettes and such. 450hp and your there and grandma can still drive it if your combo is good. For our trucks about 550hp is needed or 500 and a well thought setup.

Posted via Mobile Device
Redsled
i comend you for dropping a 8.1 liter in your square, are those castings for EFI vortecs on the big blocks or old school? insidious, he is right, i think it would be easy to take a nasty small block and turn our arrow dynamic bricks into rockets, but intill then i say the big blocks are allowed, not many small blocks running the street in our squares touting less than 12 second passes, not to mention the all stock part. so yea much of what you and i are gonna hear on this thread post is gonna be sick, nasty small blocks, and BIG BLOCKS!
__________________
Her name is Quicksilver
1978 Chevrolet silverado, shortbox stepside currently being swapped IN is a LM7 5300 vortec, 4l80E, factory 4.11s, slammed, a dream ride and coined QUICKSILVER
gotta pay $$ if you wanna play
chevybuilder18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 08:31 PM   #24
flamingbig10
6.0 powered square
 
flamingbig10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mesquite texas
Posts: 3,459
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

ls motors like loose stalls
__________________
Aaron
1980 c-10 short bed lowered, cammed 6.0, 4l80e 3600 stall, smp tune, wilwoods, and flames best time so far best et 7.86 @87 on motor 7.57 90 on a 75 shot
Build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=283326
flamingbig10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2012, 03:03 AM   #25
KQQL IT
At the body shop.
 
KQQL IT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Land of fruits and nuts.
Posts: 5,257
Re: Anybody running lower then 12s QM?

Cool truck.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
" That didnt make it any newer "
" Dont antique the equipment "
KQQL IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com